Review of Other Engineer’s Work

Case 20 Source
Back to Case

Document Structure

5

Sections

5/5

With Embeddings

100%

Coverage

384D

Dimensions
Embeddings use 384D local model for precedent matching
Document Sections

Content Length
135 chars
HTML Length
135 chars
Plain Text Length
135 chars
Embedding Dimension
384 Compatible
Created
2025-07-21 12:43
Updated
2025-07-21 12:43
Content Preview
In answering the City Administrator’s specific questions and by criticizing the work of Engineer B, Engineer C’s action were unethical.

Content Length
5145 chars
HTML Length
5145 chars
Plain Text Length
4763 chars
Embedding Dimension
384 Compatible
Created
2025-07-21 12:43
Updated
2025-07-21 12:43
Content Preview
<p>Competition for engineering work by private consulting firms can be quite intense. Selection of a winning proposal may be made on razor-thin margins. Competitive edges are sought to win work over other firms. The potential benefit of stretching ethical bounds to achieve a competitive edge may seem to merit consideration.</p> <p>In this case, Engineer C has criticized the work of another engineer, Engineer B. Further, Engineer C voiced this criticism while Engineer B was still under contract with Client A, and Engineer C may not have known all the circumstances under which Engineer B performed his work as Engineer C was not involved in Engineer B’s decision-making process.</p> <p>NSPE Code of Ethics Section III.6 states that Engineers shall not attempt to obtain employment or advancement or professional engagements by untruthfully criticizing other engineers, or by other improper or questionable methods. Engineer C could be truthful, as far as C is aware, in this conversation. However, Engineer C’s statements may not be accurate since C might not know all the circumstances. As such, Engineer C’s conversation with Client A could easily be seen as improper and questionable since, during the conversation with the City Administrator, Engineer C was not fully cognizant of Engineer B’s situation.</p> <p>In <a href="https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/ethics-resources/board-ethical-review-cases/appropriate-notification-and-review" target="_blank">BER Case 93-3</a>, Engineer A was retained by a major franchiser to provide engineering design services for a chain of stores throughout the United States. After several years, the franchiser decided to terminate its relationship with Engineer A and provided Engineer A of notice of its intent not to renew its contract with Engineer A’s firm. In order to maintain continuity and before the contract expired, the franchiser began discussions with Engineer B and retained Engineer B to provide immediate review of design concerns. Pr...

Content Length
1063 chars
HTML Length
1063 chars
Plain Text Length
1063 chars
Embedding Dimension
384 Compatible
Created
2025-07-21 12:43
Updated
2025-07-21 12:43
Content Preview
Client A is a city which receives consulting engineering services from a selected private firm. The contract runs for 3 years. Engineer B is currently hired under these contract terms and is in the final year of the 3-year contract. The City Administrator leads the effort for the city to coordinate the work of Engineer B. The City Administrator will also be heavily involved in the effort to select the consulting firm for the next 3-year contract. The City Administrator has questioned the judgment of Engineer B on several occasions during the contract period. The City Administrator also has previous experiences with a competing firm, Engineer C. The City Administrator contacts Engineer C to question him on specific issues Engineer B has worked on for the City. Engineer C fully realizes that answering these questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining an advantage in the competition for the next 3-year contract. Engineer C answers the City Administrator’s questions on the specific issues and is critical of Engineer B’s decisions.

Content Length
104 chars
HTML Length
104 chars
Plain Text Length
104 chars
Embedding Dimension
384 Compatible
Created
2025-07-21 12:43
Updated
2025-07-21 12:43
Content Preview
Is Engineer C’s answering of the City Administrator’s questions and his criticism of Engineer B ethical?

Content Length
2633 chars
HTML Length
2633 chars
Plain Text Length
5536 chars
Embedding Dimension
384 Compatible
Created
2025-07-21 12:43
Updated
2025-07-21 12:43
Content Preview
<div class="field__items"> <div class="field__item"><div> <h2> <div class="field field--name-name field--type-string field--label-hidden field__item">III.6.</div> </h2> <div> <div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-description field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field__item"><p>Engineers shall not attempt to obtain employment or advancement or professional engagements by untruthfully criticizing other engineers, or by other improper or questionable methods.</p> </div> <div> <div>Subject Reference</div> <div class="field__items"> <div class="field__item"><a href="https://www.nspe.org/categories/subject-reference-guide-code-ethics/unfair-competition" target="_blank">Unfair Competition</a></div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="field__item"><div> <h2> <div class="field field--name-name field--type-string field--label-hidden field__item">III.7.</div> </h2> <div> <div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-description field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field__item"><p>Engineers shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of other engineers. Engineers who believe others are guilty of unethical or illegal practice shall present such information to the proper authority for action.</p> </div> <div> <div>Subject Reference</div> <div class="field__items"> <div class="field__item"><a href="https://www.nspe.org/categories/subject-reference-guide-code-ethics/public-statements-and-criticism" target="_blank">Public Statements and Criticism</a></div> <div class="field__item"><a href="https://www.nspe.org/categories/subject-reference-guide-code-ethics/unethical-practice-others" target="_blank">Unethical Practice by Others</a></div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="field__item"><div> <h2> <div class="field field--name-name field--type-string field--label-hidden field__item">III.7.a.</div> </h2> <div> <div class="clearfix text...
Similar Cases

No similar cases found yet

More cases need embeddings for matching
About Embeddings

Model: all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (local)

Dimension: 384

Use: Semantic similarity for precedent matching

Storage: pgvector (PostgreSQL)