Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Conflict of Interest - Municipal Engineer

Case Number: 74-2

Year: 1974

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
72%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
34%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 III.5

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs None

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
39%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 III.5

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs None

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
31%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
42%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
44%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 III.5

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
39%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
53%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
11%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
58%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
52%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
60%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 II.4.d III.5

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
54%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 II.4.d III.5

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
30%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
41%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
20%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
46%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
49%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer