Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

View Similarity Network
Select Source Case
Source Case: Reviewing Work of Another Engineer and Thereafter Performing Engineering Services for Client

Case Number: 11-12

Year: 2011

View Full Case

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Cites Source 52% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
58%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
56%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
56%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.1.a III.5 +1

Topics: Unfair Competition Confidential Information Conflict of Interest

Citations: 63-5, 74-2

Outcome: Both Mixed

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

50% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
76%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
44%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
44%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a II.4.d III.1.a +1

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Cited Precedent 49% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
67%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
78%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Citations: 63-5, 74-2

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

49% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
61%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
75%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
71%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
56%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
76%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
62%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a III.1.a III.5

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Unethical Practice by Others

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

47% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
34%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
22%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Mixed

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

47% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
38%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5 III.7.b

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Conflict of Interest

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

46% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
56%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
61%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
38%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Citations: 74-2

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

46% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
59%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
20%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
36%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a III.1.a

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Mixed

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

45% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
66%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
74%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
18%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a III.1.a

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Unethical Practice by Others Unfair Competition

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue