Find Precedents

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

View Similarity Network
Select Source Case
Source Case: Excess Stormwater Runoff

Case Number: 23-2

Year: 2023

View Full Case

Found 10 Precedents

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
44% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
28%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
48%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
36%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.4 I.6 +1

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees Errors +1

Outcome: Both Unclear

Pattern: Both Stalemate

43% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Topics: Conflict of Interest Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unclear

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

41% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
70%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
17%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
21%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.4

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to the Public

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

39% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
23%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
27%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 I.6 II.4.a

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees Conflict of Interest

Citations: Case 14-8

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

39% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
56%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
18%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
17%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 III.2.d

Topics: Sustainable Development Duty to the Public

Citations: Case 95-5

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

38% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
34%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
49%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
40%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.4 III.1.a +1

Topics: Errors Duty to the Public Faithful Agents and Trustees +3

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

37% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
51%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.4 III.2.d

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees Sustainable Development +1

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

35% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
53%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
18%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
20%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 I.6

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

35% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
12%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees Sustainable Development +1

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Unclear

34% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
55%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
9%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.6

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

References View all

Richter, M.M. & Weber, R.O. (2013). Case-Based Reasoning: A Textbook. Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-40166-4.

Reimers, N. & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. Proceedings of EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, pp. 3982-3992. DOI: 10.18653/v1/D19-1410

Sun, Z., Zhang, K., Yu, W., Wang, H. & Xu, J. (2024). Logic rules as explanations for legal case retrieval. Proceedings of LREC-COLING 2024, pp. 10747-10759. ACL Anthology

Wiratunga, N., et al. (2024). CBR-RAG: Case-based reasoning for retrieval augmented generation in LLMs for legal question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04302. arXiv

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue