Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Misrepresentation - Changes Made to Engineer’s Report

Case Number: 15-2

Year: 2015

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
39%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
75%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.2 II.1.a +3

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
42%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a II.1.b +2

Topics: Engineering Document Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
46%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
55%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.5 II.1.b +3

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Plans/Specifications +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Cites Source 55% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
58%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
38%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
46%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.2 II.2.b +2

Topics: Unethical Practice by Others Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
36%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 II.1.a II.2.a +3

Topics: Plans/Specifications Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
75%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
40%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b II.2.c

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
46%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 II.2.a II.2.b +2

Topics: Plans/Specifications Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
27%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
40%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
64%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
62%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
36%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.5 II.1.a +1

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
63%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer