Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Public Health Safety and Welfare—Engineering Standards

Case Number: 17-7

Year: 2017

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
83%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
46%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 00-5, 07-10

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
60%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +3

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
38%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
78%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 00-5

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
54%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +4

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
73%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a II.1.f +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
29%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
76%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
58%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
46%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +3

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Opinions +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
45%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
60%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
31%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a II.1.f +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
54%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
42%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate