Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

View Similarity Network
Select Source Case
Source Case: Engineer’s Obligation to Consider Feasible Options

Case Number: 15-12

Year: 2015

View Full Case

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
59% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
51%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
73%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
62%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.3 II.1 +5

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

59% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
60%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
44%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.3 +5

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

50% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
23%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
52%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
56%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.3 II.1 +6

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Cited Precedent 50% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
45%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
57%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
40%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.3 II.3.a II.3.b +1

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Conflict of Interest

Citations: 79-2

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

49% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
51%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
43%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.3 +3

Topics: Duty to the Public Community Service/Civic Affairs

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
55%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
57%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
22%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 III.1.b +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Cited Precedent 48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
31%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
20%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 III.1.b +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

47% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 III.1.b +1

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

46% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
38%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 III.1.b +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

46% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
55%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
31%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 III.1.b +1

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue