Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Statements Made During Negotiations

Case Number: 05-5

Year: 2005

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
55%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
81%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
56%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.3 I.5 II.5.a +2

Topics: Advertising Public Statements and Criticism Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.3 I.5 III.1.a +1

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Self-Promotion +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
41%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Self-Promotion +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
23%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
57%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.3 I.5 II.5.a +1

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Self-Promotion

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
45%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
39%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.3 II.5.a III.1.a +1

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts

Citations: 72-11

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
35%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
22%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Self-Promotion +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
31%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
25%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.3 I.5 III.1.a +1

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Self-Promotion +2

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
63%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
23%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.3 I.5 III.3.a

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Self-Promotion

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
73%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
13%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
27%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 III.1.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag