Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Failure To Report Information Affecting Public Safety

Case Number: 90-5

Year: 1990

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
80%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Cites Source 59% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
62%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Confidential Information Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
73%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
56%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
57%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
45%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Confidential Information Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
60%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
43%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
78%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
58%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
38%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a

Topics: Confidential Information Duty to the Public

Citations: 82-2, 84-5

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
22%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
61%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
63%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag