Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Public Health and Safety—Scaffolding for Highway Ramp

Case Number: 12-11

Year: 2012

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
54%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
83%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
34%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
78%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
83%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 00-5, 89-7

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Oscillation vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
97%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
71%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Citations: 00-5, 89-7 +2

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Oscillation vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
71%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 90-5

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
25%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
71%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 89-7

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Oscillation vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
36%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
58%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
86%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +3

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Oscillation vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
83%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
46%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 00-5, 07-10

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Oscillation vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
94%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
83%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 92-6, 00-5 +3

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Oscillation vs Stalemate

Cited Precedent 56% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
38%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
56%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
83%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 92-6, 89-7 +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
57%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
94%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
71%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 92-6, 00-5 +3

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Oscillation vs Transfer