Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Public Health, Safety and Welfare-Former Employee's Participation in a Public Safety Standards Hearing

Case Number: 16-10

Year: 2016

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
33%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
87%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
15%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Opinions +1

Citations: 76-4

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
23%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
52%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
56%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.3 II.1 +6

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
32%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
47%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
23%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +5

Topics: Engineering Document Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
26%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
40%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
27%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +3

Topics: Confidential Information Duty to the Public

Citations: 76-4

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
56%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
35%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
36%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +3

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Confidential Information +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
59%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
41%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
21%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.2 II.1 +4

Topics: Engineering Document Opinions Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
27%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
42%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
60%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.3 II.1 +6

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Opinions +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
62%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
27%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
61%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
27%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.3 II.3.a II.3.b +1

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Opinions

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
62%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
31%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
27%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation