Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

View Similarity Network
Select Source Case
Source Case: Conflict Of Interest—Public Employee Serving As Part-Time Consultant

Case Number: 02-8

Year: 2002

View Full Case

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Cites Source 62% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.1.c III.5 +1

Topics: Outside Employment/Moonlighting Faithful Agents and Trustees Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
58%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
57%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
17%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

47% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
56%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
20%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

45% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
11%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

44% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
43%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
60%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
8%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

43% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
41%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
7%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

43% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
34%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

43% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
9%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
25%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

42% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
28%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
9%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue