Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Expert Witness—Disclosure of Interests Represented

Case Number: 07-12

Year: 2007

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.1.c III.5 +1

Topics: Outside Employment/Moonlighting Faithful Agents and Trustees Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Cited Precedent 54% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
82%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
20%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
66%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
74%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
11%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
17%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
37%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
38%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5 III.7.b

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Conflict of Interest

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
61%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
7%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
55%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
57%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
14%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

44% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
57%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
8%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate