Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Employment—Duty To Disclose Revocation Of Contractor License

Case Number: 03-6

Year: 2003

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
56%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
40%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 I.5 III.1.a +1

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Self-Promotion +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
77%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
20%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Advertising Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Self-Promotion

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
38%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
38%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 II.4.a III.5

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
60%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
67%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
22%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a III.5

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
56%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
78%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
11%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
25%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 II.4.a III.5

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
62%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
86%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 I.5 II.4.a +3

Topics: Advertising Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony +1

Citations: 97-11

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
41%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Self-Promotion +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
45%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
67%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Self-Promotion Advertising +2

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Cites Source 49% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
98%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.4 I.5 II.4.a +1

Topics: Advertising

Citations: 97-11, 75-5

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer