Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

View Similarity Network
Select Source Case
Source Case: Public Welfare - Hazardous Waste

Case Number: 92-6

Year: 1992

View Full Case

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Cited Precedent 59% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
62%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Confidential Information Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

57% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
41%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
75%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
40%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b +1

Topics: Confidential Information Duty to the Public

Citations: 89-7

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Cited Precedent 56% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
43%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.4

Topics: Confidential Information Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

55% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
56%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

53% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
37%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
47%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
60%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

51% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
35%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Self-Promotion Advertising +2

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

49% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
39%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
25%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Cites Source 48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
43%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
48%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
43%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 89-7, 90-5

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
76%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
14%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.4

Topics: Confidential Information

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
43%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
38%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue