Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Signing and Sealing Plans Not Prepared by Engineer

Case Number: 86-2

Year: 1986

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b II.2.c

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work Signing Plans/Documents

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
62%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
43%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b II.2.c

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
57%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
22%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
83%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work Signing Plans/Documents

Citations: 85-3

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
75%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
40%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b II.2.c

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
67%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
52%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
38%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b II.2.c

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work Signing Plans/Documents

Citations: 85-3

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
57%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
22%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.b II.2.c

Topics: Competence Signing Plans/Documents

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
55%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work Signing Plans/Documents

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
69%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
60%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
8%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
51%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
20%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
44%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.2.a II.2.b

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer