Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

View Similarity Network
Select Source Case
Source Case: Conflict Of Interest—Consultant Serving As City Engineer

Case Number: 01-11

Year: 2001

View Full Case

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
54% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
73%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
40%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
29%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4 II.4.a II.4.b +1

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Oscillation

Cited Precedent 54% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
62%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
44%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
22%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a II.4.b III.5 +1

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs None

51% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4 II.4.a II.4.b +1

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

51% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
65%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
75%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4 II.4.a II.4.b +3

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

50% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
36%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
71%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
29%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4 II.4.a III.1 +2

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Cites Source 49% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
67%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
78%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Citations: 63-5, 74-2

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
17%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.d III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

48% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
41%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
56%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
40%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
25%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4 II.4.a III.1 +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

47% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
62%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
73%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
8%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
22%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.5

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Citations: 74-2

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs None

47% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
67%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
14%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.4.a II.4.b

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue