Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

View Similarity Network
Select Source Case
Source Case: Public Welfare - Duty Of Government Engineer

Case Number: 92-4

Year: 1992

View Full Case

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Cited Precedent 69% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
83%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
86%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Cited Precedent 62% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
73%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a III.1.b +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 65-12

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

57% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
57%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

57% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
30%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
76%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
57%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 82-5, 88-6 +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

56% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
39%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
76%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

55% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
41%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
62%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
71%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
83%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

54% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
45%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

53% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
61%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

53% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
25%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
56%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Engineering Document Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

52% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue