Find Precedents

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

View Similarity Network
Select Source Case
Source Case: Sustainable Development and Resilient Infrastructure

Case Number: 24-05

Year: 2025

View Full Case

Found 10 Precedents

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
68% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
23%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
59%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
100%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Unclear vs Transfer

52% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
26%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
54%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
100%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Duty to Disclose +1

Citations: Case 21-7

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Unclear vs Stalemate

36% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
61%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Community Service/Civic Affairs Duty to the Public Faithful Agents and Trustees +3

Citations: Case 15-12

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Unclear vs Transfer

35% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
12%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees Sustainable Development +1

Outcome: None vs Unclear

Pattern: Unclear vs Stalemate

33% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
22%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
11%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Topics: Duty to the Public Faithful Agents and Trustees Employer +2

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Unclear vs Transfer

33% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
27%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
55%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Topics: Political Contributions, Gifts, Commissions Faithful Agents and Trustees Employer

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Unclear vs Stalemate

32% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
41%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
49%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to the Public

Outcome: None vs Unclear

Pattern: Unclear vs Transfer

30% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
56%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
60%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to Disclose +3

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Unclear vs Transfer

27% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
49%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Topics: Political Contributions, Gifts, Commissions Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Unclear vs Stalemate

24% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
30%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Topics: Employer Faithful Agents and Trustees Political Contributions, Gifts, Commissions

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Unclear vs Transfer

References View all

Richter, M.M. & Weber, R.O. (2013). Case-Based Reasoning: A Textbook. Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-40166-4.

Reimers, N. & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. Proceedings of EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, pp. 3982-3992. DOI: 10.18653/v1/D19-1410

Sun, Z., Zhang, K., Yu, W., Wang, H. & Xu, J. (2024). Logic rules as explanations for legal case retrieval. Proceedings of LREC-COLING 2024, pp. 10747-10759. ACL Anthology

Wiratunga, N., et al. (2024). CBR-RAG: Case-based reasoning for retrieval augmented generation in LLMs for legal question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04302. arXiv

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue