Find Precedents

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Community Engagement for Infrastructure Projects

Case Number: 24-04

Year: 2025

Found 10 Precedents

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
59%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
100%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Unethical Practice by Others

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
26%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
54%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
100%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Duty to Disclose +1

Citations: Case 21-7

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Unclear

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
53%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Advertising Duty to the Public Self-Promotion +3

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
17%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Topics: Advertising Self-Promotion Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
59%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Unethical Practice by Others

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
43%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
47%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
14%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Advertising Self-Promotion +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
60%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Unethical Practice by Others Advertising +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
49%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
30%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
45%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
12%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Topics: Public Statements and Criticism Unethical Practice by Others Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
36%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
50%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: None vs Unclear

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

References View all

Richter, M.M. & Weber, R.O. (2013). Case-Based Reasoning: A Textbook. Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-40166-4.

Reimers, N. & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. Proceedings of EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, pp. 3982-3992. DOI: 10.18653/v1/D19-1410

Sun, Z., Zhang, K., Yu, W., Wang, H. & Xu, J. (2024). Logic rules as explanations for legal case retrieval. Proceedings of LREC-COLING 2024, pp. 10747-10759. ACL Anthology

Wiratunga, N., et al. (2024). CBR-RAG: Case-based reasoning for retrieval augmented generation in LLMs for legal question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04302. arXiv