Find Precedents

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Duty to Report – Material Information

Case Number: 21-12

Year: 2021

Found 10 Precedents

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.1.i III.3.a

Topics: Advertising Self-Promotion Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
25%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
56%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.3.a III.3.a

Topics: Advertising Duty to the Public Self-Promotion +2

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
17%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 III.3.a

Topics: Advertising Self-Promotion Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
13%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
17%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.5

Topics: Advertising Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
8%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
12%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.6

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
7%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
10%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
11%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Topics: Advertising Duty to the Public Self-Promotion +2

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
12%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 I.5.i I.6 +1

Topics: Advertising

Citations: Case 98-5

Outcome: None vs Unclear

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
20%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Topics: Advertising Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
0%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
0%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
0%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

References View all

Richter, M.M. & Weber, R.O. (2013). Case-Based Reasoning: A Textbook. Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-40166-4.

Reimers, N. & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. Proceedings of EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, pp. 3982-3992. DOI: 10.18653/v1/D19-1410

Sun, Z., Zhang, K., Yu, W., Wang, H. & Xu, J. (2024). Logic rules as explanations for legal case retrieval. Proceedings of LREC-COLING 2024, pp. 10747-10759. ACL Anthology

Wiratunga, N., et al. (2024). CBR-RAG: Case-based reasoning for retrieval augmented generation in LLMs for legal question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04302. arXiv