Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Professional Competence In Current Structural Design

Case Number: 02-5

Year: 2002

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Cited Precedent 52% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
76%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
75%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
83%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 II.1.a II.2 +3

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work

Citations: 85-3, 94-8

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
74%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
71%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 II.2 II.2.a +2

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work

Citations: 94-8

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Cites Source 49% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
57%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
57%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
20%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 III.1.b

Topics: Liability Competence Professional Responsibility +1

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
39%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
54%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
44%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 II.1.a II.2 +1

Topics: Engineering Document

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
27%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
55%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
57%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 II.1.a II.2 +1

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
22%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
25%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a III.1.b

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
34%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
67%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
20%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a III.1.b

Topics: Engineering Document

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Cited Precedent 45% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
56%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
58%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
75%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 II.1.a II.2 +3

Topics: Competence Qualifications for Work

Citations: 85-3

Outcome: None vs Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
34%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
58%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
31%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
27%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.2 II.1.a II.2 +2

Topics: Engineering Document

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
37%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
22%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
25%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.a III.1.b

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer