Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Public Health, Safety and Welfare—Discovery of Structural Defect Affecting Subdivision

Case Number: 17-3

Year: 2017

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
68%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
91%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
57%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public Duty to Disclose Competence +1

Citations: 92-6, 00-5 +3

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
39%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
91%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
57%
Outcome Match Categorical
50%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Citations: 00-5, 89-7 +2

Outcome: None vs Mixed

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
60%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
43%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
79%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 07-10

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
43%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
75%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
36%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 89-7

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
94%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
83%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 92-6, 00-5 +3

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
41%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
27%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 III.2

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer