Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Incomplete Plans and Specifications – Engineer, Government, and Contractor Responsibilities

Case Number: 99-8

Year: 1999

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
46%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
55%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.5 II.1.b +3

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony Plans/Specifications +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
68%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
23%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.b III.1.a

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Citations: 82-5

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
31%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
56%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.2.a II.2.b +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
43%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
75%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
30%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
31%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
27%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.5 III.1.a +1

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Duty to Disclose +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
65%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
60%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
21%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
36%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.2.b III.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
23%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Misrepresentation/Omission of Facts Advertising Professional Reports, Statements, Testimony

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
64%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
45%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
27%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
56%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: II.1.b III.1.a III.3.a

Topics: Advertising

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
57%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
15%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
40%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 III.2.b

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
53%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
29%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 II.1.b III.1.a +1

Topics: Advertising

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate