Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Public Health and Safety—Building Codes to Address Environmental Risk

Case Number: 18-9

Year: 2018

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
73%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
54%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
73%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
75%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +5

Topics: Sustainable Development Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
60%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
44%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.3 +5

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
68%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
67%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
42%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
44%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Citations: 04-8, 07-6

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
46%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
67%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
54%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
30%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +4

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
42%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
46%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
48%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
59%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
31%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
75%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.3.a III.1.b +1

Topics: Sustainable Development Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
32%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
47%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
23%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +5

Topics: Engineering Document Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Ethical

Pattern: Both Transfer