Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Engineer's Recommendation For Full-Time, On-Site Project Representative

Case Number: 84-5

Year: 1984

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
38%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
78%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
80%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
47%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
80%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
71%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
100%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
39%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
57%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
73%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
57%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to Disclose Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
64%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
40%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
33%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
70%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
33%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Phase Lag

Cites Source 53% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
55%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
58%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
43%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
65%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
74%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
80%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Stalemate vs Oscillation