Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Gifts To Foreign Officials - Application Of Code Of Ethics To Non-U.S. Engineers

Case Number: 98-2

Year: 1998

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
50% Similar
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
27%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
40%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 I.6 III.1.e +1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
19%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.6 III.1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
46%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
13%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.1 III.1.e

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
38%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
57%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
11%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
44%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 I.5

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
55%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
13%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
33%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: III.1 III.5.b

Topics: Political Contributions, Gifts, Commissions

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
34%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
49%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
27%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
29%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.6 III.1 III.1.e

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
45%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
61%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
0%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
34%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
8%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
36%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
55%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
21%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
20%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.5 III.1 III.3

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
36%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
59%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
7%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
38%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Transfer vs Phase Lag