Similar Cases

Multi-factor similarity search using provision overlap, semantic similarity, and outcome alignment.

Select Source Case
Source Case: Whistleblowing - City Engineer

Case Number: 88-6

Year: 1988

Found 10 Similar Cases

Ranked by weighted similarity score
Matching Methods:
Cosine Semantic embedding similarity Jaccard Set intersection / union Categorical Exact match scoring
Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
38%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
78%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
80%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
49%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
63%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
83%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
67%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
52%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
75%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
71%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to the Public Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
69%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Stalemate

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
40%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
88%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
100%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 82-5, 65-12

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Oscillation

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
44%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
65%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
67%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
60%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
51%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
72%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
43%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Faithful Agents and Trustees Duty to the Public Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
53%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
80%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
50%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
22%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +1

Topics: Duty to the Public

Citations: 82-5, 65-12

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Both Phase Lag

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
50%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
66%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
100%
Outcome Match Categorical
0%
Subject Tags Jaccard
80%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 II.1.a +2

Topics: Duty to the Public

Outcome: None vs Ethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer

Similarity Components
Facts Similarity Cosine
65%
Discussion Similarity Cosine
78%
Provision Overlap Jaccard
27%
Outcome Match Categorical
100%
Subject Tags Jaccard
50%
Principle Tensions Jaccard
0%
What They Share

Provisions: I.1 II.1 III.2

Topics: Conflict of Interest

Outcome: Both Unethical

Pattern: Phase Lag vs Transfer