Step 4 Review - Case 10

Step 4: Synthesis Review

Case 10: Post-Public Employment - City Engineer Transitioning to Consultant

Back to Step 4

15

Total Entities

Passes 1-3

9

Code Provisions

NSPE References

2

Questions

Ethical Dilemmas

2

Conclusions

Board Findings

Synthesis Reasoning Flow

Shows how NSPE provisions inform questions and conclusions - the board's reasoning chain (LangGraph-style)

Show Labels

Node Types & Relationships

Nodes:

■ NSPE Provisions (rectangles) ◆ Questions (diamonds) ▬ Conclusions (rounded) ● Entities (circles)

Edge Colors:

→ Provision informs Question
→ Question answered by Conclusion
→ Provision applies to Entity

Note: For individual entity visualization, see OntServe's full ontology view

NSPE Code Provisions Referenced

NSPE_I_4_ I.4.

Full Text:

Act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees.

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'City Engineer Resignation', 'reasoning': 'This provision requires faithful service to employers, which relates to how the engineer handles their resignation and transition from public service'} {'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Private Firm Position Acceptance', 'reasoning': "This provision governs the engineer's duty to act faithfully when accepting new employment, ensuring no breach of trust with former employer"}

NSPE_I_6_ I.6.

Full Text:

Conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession.

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'event', 'entity_label': 'Revolving Door Employment', 'reasoning': "This provision addresses conducting oneself ethically to enhance the profession's reputation, which is directly challenged by revolving door practices"} {'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Former Public Official Hiring', 'reasoning': 'This provision governs whether hiring a former public official is conducted honorably and ethically'}

NSPE_II_4_a_ II.4.a.

Full Text:

Engineers shall disclose all known or potential conflicts of interest that could influence or appear to influence their judgment or the quality of their services.

Relevant Case Excerpts:

From discussion:
"the client (i.e., the City) can be sufficient to cure “known or potential conflicts of interest that could influence or appear to influence the engineer’s judgment or the quality of their services” (II.4.a)."
Confidence: 95.0%

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Continued City Contract Pursuit', 'reasoning': "This provision requires disclosure of conflicts when the engineer's new firm pursues contracts with their former employer"} {'entity_type': 'event', 'entity_label': 'Revolving Door Employment', 'reasoning': 'This provision addresses the inherent conflict of interest created by revolving door employment situations'}

NSPE_II_4_c_ II.4.c.

Full Text:

Engineers shall not solicit or accept financial or other valuable consideration, directly or indirectly, from outside agents in connection with the work for which they are responsible.

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Private Firm Position Acceptance', 'reasoning': 'This provision prohibits accepting valuable consideration from outside agents, which could include employment offers related to public work'}

NSPE_II_4_e_ II.4.e.

Full Text:

Engineers shall not solicit or accept a contract from a governmental body on which a principal or officer of their organization serves as a member.

Relevant Case Excerpts:

From discussion:
"Because Engineer A was an officer or principal of his engineering firm, according to NSPE Code of Ethics Section II.4.e, Engineer A was not eligible to provide engineering services to Smithtown for the local road project."
Confidence: 95.0%

From discussion:
"This conclusion is based upon the language of Code Section II.4.e and is irrespective of whether the town’s procurement laws were scrupulously followed."
Confidence: 90.0%

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Continued City Contract Pursuit', 'reasoning': "This provision may restrict the engineer's new firm from soliciting contracts if the engineer still has connections to the governmental body"}

NSPE_II_5_b_ II.5.b.

Full Text:

Engineers shall not offer, give, solicit, or receive, either directly or indirectly, any contribution to influence the award of a contract by public authority, or which may be reasonably construed by the public as having the effect or intent of influencing the awarding of a contract. They shall not offer any gift or other valuable consideration in order to secure work. They shall not pay a commission, percentage, or brokerage fee in order to secure work, except to a bona fide employee or bona fide established commercial or marketing agencies retained by them.

Relevant Case Excerpts:

From discussion:
"Likewise, Code Section II.5.b would prohibit the principals of Firm AE&R from inducing Engineer A to join the firm as a way of influencing the awarding of city contracts for improper reasons not related to Engineer A’s qualificat"
Confidence: 90.0%

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Former Public Official Hiring', 'reasoning': 'This provision prohibits actions that could be construed as influencing contract awards, including strategic hiring of former officials'} {'entity_type': 'event', 'entity_label': 'Potential Regulatory Capture', 'reasoning': 'This provision addresses situations where hiring practices could be seen as attempting to influence public contract awards'}

NSPE_III_4_ III.4.

Full Text:

Engineers shall not disclose, without consent, confidential information concerning the business affairs or technical processes of any present or former client or employer, or public body on which they serve.

Relevant Case Excerpts:

From discussion:
"follow the recommendations in Case 14-8 and remain isolated from former projects until those contracts lapse. Confidentiality is another ethical obligation that continues after one severs employment (Code Section III.4)."
Confidence: 90.0%

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Private Firm Position Acceptance', 'reasoning': 'This provision restricts the engineer from disclosing confidential information from their former public employer'} {'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Continued City Contract Pursuit', 'reasoning': 'This provision governs use of confidential information when pursuing contracts with former employer'}

NSPE_III_4_a_ III.4.a.

Full Text:

Engineers shall not, without the consent of all interested parties, promote or arrange for new employment or practice in connection with a specific project for which the engineer has gained particular and specialized knowledge.

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Private Firm Position Acceptance', 'reasoning': 'This provision restricts arranging new employment based on specialized knowledge gained from specific public projects'} {'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Continued City Contract Pursuit', 'reasoning': 'This provision may prohibit pursuing specific projects where the engineer gained specialized knowledge as city engineer'}

NSPE_III_6_ III.6.

Full Text:

Engineers shall not attempt to obtain employment or advancement or professional engagements by untruthfully criticizing other engineers, or by other improper or questionable methods.

Relevant Case Excerpts:

From discussion:
"t Engineer A from the ethical requirements and obligations of the NSPE Code of Ethics. What are some of these ethical requirements and obligations? Among the most obvious are Code Sections II.4.c and III.6 which prohibit engineers from advancing their professional careers by any improper or questionable method."
Confidence: 90.0%

Ethical Questions

Question_2

Is it ethical for Engineer D to be immediately, directly involved with AE&R's projects with the City?

Mentioned Entities:
roles states resources principles obligations constraints capabilities actions events

Question_1

Is it ethical for Engineer D to accept employment with AE&R?

Mentioned Entities:
roles states resources principles obligations constraints capabilities actions events

Board Conclusions

Conclusion_1

Inasmuch as no "revolving door" contractual (i.e., legal) prohibition exists to private employment, it would be ethical for Engineer D to accept employment with firm AE&R. This finding is consistent with a long history of NSPE cases; engineers are free to move and work where they would like.

Answers:
1

Conclusion_2

As to whether it would be ethical for Engineer D to be immediately, directly involved with AE&R's projects with the City, the answer is mixed as multiple considerations and details will affect the outcome. For example, participation in ongoing projects for which Engineer D has particular specialized knowledge may be ethical with disclosure and consent. Likewise, situations such as negotiating change orders (potential conflict of interest) might also be cured by disclosure and consent. However, for complex situations (e.g., perception of influence relative to solicitation of a contract) or prohibitive situations (e.g., divulging confidential information) a voluntary embargo by Engineer D for a specified period of time may be efficacious.

Answers:
2

Cited Provisions:
I.6