This page shows the pre-commit working store (the raw extraction under review). This case was committed to OntServe on 2026-10-24 07:56; the committed record differs by design (deduplication, typing, and agent binding are applied at commit). View the committed record
Overview
Facts Discussion
Provenance Draft

PASS 1: Contextual Framework Facts Section

Case 100: Duty To Report Unrelated Information Observed During Rendering Of Services

R Roles
4
Classes
3
Individuals
S States
6
Classes
6
Individuals
Rs Resources
1
Classes
2
Individuals

Extracted Ontology Entities

22 RDF entities extracted organized by concept type

R Roles

Roles Classes
4
changed
InspectorEngineerRole
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
Review
Inspector Engineer Role
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A professional engineering role in which an engineer is retained to perform an inspection of a structure on behalf of a client, identify specified conditions, and report the findings to the client in a report.
Inherited from InspectorEngineerRole · note
A professional engineering role in which an engineer performs an engineering inspection of a property on behalf of a client and renders a written report of its condition to that client.
Properties
Text References:
"VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge."
"Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair."
Confidence: 0.9
Role Category: provider_client
Role Kind: professional
Distinguishing Features:
  • Performs inspection to identify conditions within a defined scope of work rather than producing designs
  • Reports inspection findings to the retaining client for further review and repair
Professional Scope: Engineering inspection of structures within a contractually defined scope, with reporting of findings to the client
Typical Qualifications:
  • Professional engineering qualification in the relevant discipline
  • Experience in structural or infrastructure inspection
Associated Virtues:
  • Diligence
  • Honesty in reporting
  • Competence
[facts] "VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge.; Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair.
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • roleKind content: professional
  • distinguishingFeatures content: Performs inspection to identify conditions within a defined scope of work rather than producing designs; Reports inspection findings to the retaining client for further review and repair
  • professionalScope content: Engineering inspection of structures within a contractually defined scope, with reporting of findings to the client
  • typicalQualifications content: Professional engineering qualification in the relevant discipline; Experience in structural or infrastructure inspection
  • associatedVirtues content: Diligence; Honesty in reporting; Competence
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
changed
ConsultantEngineerRole
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
Review
Prime Engineer Role
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A professional architecture and engineering firm holding the prime engagement with a project owner, which retains subconsultants to perform specialty services under that engagement and reviews their reported findings.
Inherited from PrimeEngineerRole · note
The professional engineer holding the prime engagement on a project who retains other engineers to provide specialty engineering services under that engagement.
Properties
Text References:
"A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge."
"VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge."
Confidence: 0.87
Role Category: provider_client
Role Kind: professional
Distinguishing Features:
  • Holds the prime contract with the project owner
  • Retains and coordinates subconsultants for specialty services
  • Receives and reviews subconsultant findings for further review and repair
Professional Scope: Prime professional responsibility for delivery of the engaged project services, including engagement and coordination of subconsultants
Typical Qualifications:
  • Licensed architecture and engineering practice
  • Capacity to hold prime professional service contracts
Associated Virtues:
  • Competence
  • Responsibility
  • Integrity
[facts] "A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge.; VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge.
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • roleKind content: professional
  • distinguishingFeatures content: Holds the prime contract with the project owner; Retains and coordinates subconsultants for specialty services; Receives and reviews subconsultant findings for further review and repair
  • professionalScope content: Prime professional responsibility for delivery of the engaged project services, including engagement and coordination of subconsultants
  • typicalQualifications content: Licensed architecture and engineering practice; Capacity to hold prime professional service contracts
  • associatedVirtues content: Competence; Responsibility; Integrity
  • confidence assessment: 0.87
changed
ClientRole
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
Linked
Client Role
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A public agency that commissions professional services for public infrastructure work, here retaining a prime consultant for a major scheduled bridge overhaul and receiving reported information about the bridge condition.
Inherited from ClientRole · note
The role borne by the party that commissions the project work. This is the occupational archetype; the duty relationship is carried separately by :ProviderClientRole.
Properties
Text References:
"A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge."
"The public agency contacts VWX Architects and Engineers which then contacts Engineer A and asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his s..."
Confidence: 0.85
Role Kind: participant
Distinguishing Features:
  • Commissions the project work and receives reported findings
  • Bears standing in the case without profession-generated duties articulated by the case
[facts] "A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge.; The public agency contacts VWX Architects and Engineers which then contacts Engineer A and asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work.
  • roleKind content: participant
  • distinguishingFeatures content: Commissions the project work and receives reported findings; Bears standing in the case without profession-generated duties articulated by the case
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
changed
PublicResponsibilityRole
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
Review
Public Role
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A member of the public traveling on public infrastructure who is affected by a failure of that infrastructure, here a driver killed when a bridge wall failed to restrain his vehicle.
Inherited from PublicRole · note
The occupational role borne by members of the public and affected community stakeholders in a case; the role side of the collective party :PublicInterest. The professional duty side is :PublicResponsibilityRole. No IFC equivalent, since IFC has no public or society role.
Properties
Text References:
"while traveling across the bridge, Police Officer B loses control of his patrol car. The vehicle crashed into the bridge wall. The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, k..."
Confidence: 0.8
Role Kind: participant
Distinguishing Features:
  • Affected by the condition of the infrastructure rather than performing professional services on it
  • Carries standing in the case without profession-generated duties
[facts] "The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: while traveling across the bridge, Police Officer B loses control of his patrol car. The vehicle crashed into the bridge wall. The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B.
  • roleKind content: participant
  • distinguishingFeatures content: Affected by the condition of the infrastructure rather than performing professional services on it; Carries standing in the case without profession-generated duties
  • confidence assessment: 0.8
Roles Individuals
3
Engineer A Inspector Engineer
Inspector Engineer Role
Review
Inspector Engineer Role
C100
Text References:
"VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge."
"Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair."
"Engineer A verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency."
"Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested."
Confidence: 0.92
Actor: Engineer A
Role Class: Inspector Engineer
Role Category: provider_client
Role Kind: professional
Specialty: Civil engineering
Technical Background: Civil engineer
Case Involvement: Retained as subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services limited to identifying pavement damage. While inspecting, notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall near the fatal accident, notes it in his engineering notes, verbally reports it to VWX, and, when asked, agrees to retain the information in his notes but not include it in the final report. Does not report the information to any other public agency or authority.
Engagement capacity: Subconsultant to VWX Architects and Engineers
Scope of work: Solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair
Hasclient: VWX Architects and Engineers
"VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge."
Workreviewedby: VWX Architects and Engineers
"Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair."
[facts] "VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer A
  • attributes: {'engagement_capacity': 'Subconsultant to VWX Architects and Engineers', 'scope_of_work': 'Solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'hasClient', 'target': 'VWX Architects and Engineers', 'quote': 'VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge.'}; {'type': 'workReviewedBy', 'target': 'VWX Architects and Engineers', 'quote': 'Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair.'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge.; Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair.; Engineer A verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency.; Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested.
  • roleClass content: Inspector Engineer
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • roleKind content: professional
  • specialty content: Civil engineering
  • technicalBackground content: Civil engineer
  • caseInvolvement content: Retained as subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services limited to identifying pavement damage. While inspecting, notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall near the fatal accident, notes it in his engineering notes, verbally reports it to VWX, and, when asked, agrees to retain the information in his notes but not include it in the final report. Does not report the information to any other public agency or authority.
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
VWX Prime Consultant Firm
Prime Engineer Role
Review
Prime Engineer Role
C100
Text References:
"A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge."
"VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge."
"The public agency contacts VWX Architects and Engineers which then contacts Engineer A and asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his s..."
Confidence: 0.9
Actor: VWX Architects and Engineers
Role Class: Prime Consultant Engineer
Role Category: provider_client
Role Kind: professional
Specialty: Architecture and engineering services
Additional Relationships: {'type': 'retains as subconsultant', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge.'}
Case Involvement: Retained by the public agency for the bridge overhaul, retains Engineer A as inspection subconsultant, receives Engineer A's verbal report of the defective wall condition and relays it to the public agency, then, after the public agency's contact, asks Engineer A not to include the additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work.
Engagement: Prime consultant for major scheduled overhaul of the bridge
Hasclient: Public Agency
"A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge."
Reviewsworkof: Engineer A
"Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair."
[facts] "A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: VWX Architects and Engineers
  • attributes: {'engagement': 'Prime consultant for major scheduled overhaul of the bridge'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'hasClient', 'target': 'Public Agency', 'quote': 'A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge.'}; {'type': 'reviewsWorkOf', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair.'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: A public agency retains the services of VWX Architects and Engineers to perform a major scheduled overhaul of a bridge.; VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge.; The public agency contacts VWX Architects and Engineers which then contacts Engineer A and asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work.
  • roleClass content: Prime Consultant Engineer
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • roleKind content: professional
  • specialty content: Architecture and engineering services
  • additionalRelationships content: {'type': 'retains as subconsultant', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge.'}
  • caseInvolvement content: Retained by the public agency for the bridge overhaul, retains Engineer A as inspection subconsultant, receives Engineer A's verbal report of the defective wall condition and relays it to the public agency, then, after the public agency's contact, asks Engineer A not to include the additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Review
Public Role
C100
Text References:
"while traveling across the bridge, Police Officer B loses control of his patrol car. The vehicle crashed into the bridge wall. The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, k..."
Confidence: 0.85
Actor: Police Officer B
Role Class: Affected Member of the Public
Role Kind: participant
Case Involvement: Three months prior to the scheduled overhaul, loses control of his patrol car while traveling across the bridge; the vehicle crashes into the bridge wall, which fails to restrain it, and the vehicle falls to the river below, killing him. The apparent pre-existing defective condition Engineer A later notices is close to where this accident occurred.
Occupation: Police officer
Outcome: Killed when the bridge wall failed to restrain his vehicle
[facts] "The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Police Officer B
  • attributes: {'occupation': 'Police officer', 'outcome': 'Killed when the bridge wall failed to restrain his vehicle'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: while traveling across the bridge, Police Officer B loses control of his patrol car. The vehicle crashed into the bridge wall. The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B.
  • roleClass content: Affected Member of the Public
  • roleKind content: participant
  • caseInvolvement content: Three months prior to the scheduled overhaul, loses control of his patrol car while traveling across the bridge; the vehicle crashes into the bridge wall, which fails to restrain it, and the vehicle falls to the river below, killing him. The apparent pre-existing defective condition Engineer A later notices is close to where this accident occurred.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85

S States

States Classes
6
changed
Selective Reporting State
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Selective Reporting State
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A condition of what information has been disclosed among the parties, here the wall defect information retained in Engineer A's engineering notes and verbally reported up the chain but excluded from the final written report at the client's request, with no report made to any other public agency or authority.
Inherited from SelectiveReportingState · note
A condition of what information has been disclosed among the parties, here the state in which all available information about both design approaches, including risks and benefits, has been presented to the client's leadership.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested."
"Engineer A does not report this information to any other public agency or authority."
Confidence: 0.9
State Category: disclosure
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Material information known to the professional is excluded from the final written report
Termination Conditions: The omitted information is included in a report or otherwise formally disclosed
Principle Transformation: The truthfulness and completeness principles bear on the final report through the condition that known defect information is withheld from it while retained in the notes.
[facts] "Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested. Engineer A does not report this information to any other public a..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested.; Engineer A does not report this information to any other public agency or authority.
  • stateCategory content: disclosure
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The truthfulness and completeness principles bear on the final report through the condition that known defect information is withheld from it while retained in the notes.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Material information known to the professional is excluded from the final written report
  • terminationConditions: The omitted information is included in a report or otherwise formally disclosed
changed
Scope Limitation State
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Scope Limitation State
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A condition in which a professional's engagement is contractually limited to a defined service, here Engineer A retained as subconsultant solely to identify pavement damage on the bridge and report it to VWX, so the observed wall defect lies outside the scope of the retained services.
Inherited from ScopeLimitationState · note
A condition in which a professional's engagement is contractually limited to a defined service, here Engineer A hired by the Homeowner only to design a retaining wall system to stabilize a rear yard, so the observed sprinkler defect lies outside the scope of the retained services.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair."
Confidence: 0.95
State Category: regulatory
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Professional is retained under a contract limiting services to a defined task
Termination Conditions: Engagement is completed or the scope is amended
Obligation Activation: Duty to report identified pavement damage to VWX for further review and repair
Action Constraints: Findings outside the defined scope are not part of the contracted deliverable
Principle Transformation: The faithful-agent principle is made concrete as the duty to perform and report the specific inspection services actually retained.
[facts] "Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair.
  • stateCategory content: regulatory
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The faithful-agent principle is made concrete as the duty to perform and report the specific inspection services actually retained.
  • confidence assessment: 0.95
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Professional is retained under a contract limiting services to a defined task
  • terminationConditions: Engagement is completed or the scope is amended
  • obligationActivation: Duty to report identified pavement damage to VWX for further review and repair
  • actionConstraints: Findings outside the defined scope are not part of the contracted deliverable
changed
Public Safety Risk State
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Public Safety Risk State
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A condition of hazard exposure in which the public faces potential harm to safety or welfare, here an apparent pre-existing defective condition in a bridge wall near where a fatal vehicle accident occurred, with the wall having failed to restrain a vehicle.
Inherited from PublicSafetyRiskState · note
A condition of hazard exposure in which the public or a specific community faces potential harm to safety or welfare, such as flooding harm to residents.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall close to where the accident involving Police Officer B occurred"
"The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B."
Confidence: 0.93
State Category: risk
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: A pre-existing defective condition exists in a structure used by the public
Termination Conditions: The defective condition is repaired or otherwise corrected
Obligation Activation: Duty to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public
Principle Transformation: The public safety principle becomes concrete as a condition bearing on whether and how the observed wall defect must be addressed and communicated.
[facts] "Engineer A notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall close to where the accident involving Police Officer B occurred."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall close to where the accident involving Police Officer B occurred; The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B.
  • stateCategory content: risk
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The public safety principle becomes concrete as a condition bearing on whether and how the observed wall defect must be addressed and communicated.
  • confidence assessment: 0.93
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: A pre-existing defective condition exists in a structure used by the public
  • terminationConditions: The defective condition is repaired or otherwise corrected
  • obligationActivation: Duty to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public
changed
Unquantified Risk State
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Unquantified Risk State
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
An epistemic condition in which a professional is aware of a potential risk but has not yet quantified or fully characterized it, here Engineer A surmising that the defective wall condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure without further investigation or analysis.
Inherited from UnquantifiedRiskState · note
An epistemic condition in which a professional is aware of a potential risk but has not yet quantified or fully characterized it, so the professional's knowledge of the hazard is speculative or preliminary rather than measured.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes."
Confidence: 0.9
State Category: epistemic
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Professional observes a condition and forms a preliminary, unverified judgment that it may pose or have contributed to a hazard
Termination Conditions: The risk is quantified or fully characterized through further investigation
Obligation Activation: Duty to report the observed information to the client
Principle Transformation: The honesty and public welfare principles operate on preliminary knowledge, shaping what Engineer A must record and communicate about the surmised contributing factor.
[facts] "Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes.
  • stateCategory content: epistemic
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The honesty and public welfare principles operate on preliminary knowledge, shaping what Engineer A must record and communicate about the surmised contributing factor.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Professional observes a condition and forms a preliminary, unverified judgment that it may pose or have contributed to a hazard
  • terminationConditions: The risk is quantified or fully characterized through further investigation
  • obligationActivation: Duty to report the observed information to the client
changed
ClientDirectiveState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Client Directive State
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A condition in which the client has specifically instructed the professional in how to perform contracted services, here VWX asking Engineer A not to include the wall defect information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work.
Inherited from ClientDirectiveState · note
A condition in which the client has specifically instructed the professional in how to perform contracted services, so the professional's conduct follows a client directive, here City leaders, citing economic, political, and social considerations, instructing Firm DBA to perform the public engagement sessions in the way Firm DBA completed them.
Properties
Text References:
"asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work"
Confidence: 0.92
State Category: regulatory
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Client issues a specific instruction governing how the professional is to complete the contracted work
Termination Conditions: The directive is withdrawn or the engagement concludes
Action Constraints: The final report is to exclude the additional out-of-scope information, as requested
Principle Transformation: The faithful-agent principle is made concrete as compliance with the client's specific instruction on report contents.
[facts] "The public agency contacts VWX Architects and Engineers which then contacts Engineer A and asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his s..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work
  • stateCategory content: regulatory
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The faithful-agent principle is made concrete as compliance with the client's specific instruction on report contents.
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Client issues a specific instruction governing how the professional is to complete the contracted work
  • terminationConditions: The directive is withdrawn or the engagement concludes
  • actionConstraints: The final report is to exclude the additional out-of-scope information, as requested
changed
AuthorityAwarenessState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Review
Authority Awareness State
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
An epistemic condition in which the appropriate public officials are already aware of a problematic situation, here the public agency having been verbally informed of the wall defect information through VWX after Engineer A reported it to his client.
Inherited from AuthorityAwarenessState · note
An epistemic condition in which the appropriate public officials or proper authorities are already aware of a problematic situation and have begun an investigation, so that further reporting of the matter to them by the professional would be a useless act. Here the permit case has received media coverage and state authorities are already investigating, so the Board finds it is not incumbent upon Engineer A to bring the issue to the attention of the proper authorities.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency."
Confidence: 0.85
State Category: epistemic
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: The responsible public authority receives the information about the problematic condition
Termination Conditions: The matter is resolved or the authority acts on the information
Principle Transformation: The public welfare principle is conditioned by the fact that the responsible public agency has already received the defect information verbally.
[facts] "Engineer A verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency.
  • stateCategory content: epistemic
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The public welfare principle is conditioned by the fact that the responsible public agency has already received the defect information verbally.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: The responsible public authority receives the information about the problematic condition
  • terminationConditions: The matter is resolved or the authority acts on the information
States Individuals
6
changed
Unquantified Wall Defect Surmise
Unquantified Risk State
Linked
Unquantified Risk State
C100
Text References:
"Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes."
Confidence: 0.9
State Class: Unquantified Risk State
Subject: Engineer A
Active Period: From Engineer A's observation of the defective condition during the bridge inspection onward
Triggering Event: Engineer A notices the apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall while conducting the bridge inspection
Terminated By: Further investigation or analysis quantifying the defect's role in the wall failure, which the case does not report
Affected Parties: Engineer A
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes.
  • stateClass content: Unquantified Risk State
  • subject content: Engineer A
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A's observation of the defective condition during the bridge inspection onward
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A notices the apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall while conducting the bridge inspection
  • terminatedBy content: Further investigation or analysis quantifying the defect's role in the wall failure, which the case does not report
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
changed
Client Report Omission Directive
Client Directive State
Linked
Client Directive State
C100
Text References:
"asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work"
Confidence: 0.92
State Class: Client Directive State
Subject: Engineer A, as instructed by his client VWX Architects and Engineers
Active Period: From VWX's request through the submission of Engineer A's final report
Triggering Event: VWX Architects and Engineers, after being contacted by the public agency, asks Engineer A not to include the additional information in his final report
Terminated By: Submission of the final report as requested
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • VWX Architects and Engineers
  • Public agency
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "The public agency contacts VWX Architects and Engineers which then contacts Engineer A and asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his s..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work
  • stateClass content: Client Directive State
  • subject content: Engineer A, as instructed by his client VWX Architects and Engineers
  • activePeriod content: From VWX's request through the submission of Engineer A's final report
  • triggeringEvent content: VWX Architects and Engineers, after being contacted by the public agency, asks Engineer A not to include the additional information in his final report
  • terminatedBy content: Submission of the final report as requested
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; VWX Architects and Engineers; Public agency
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
Pavement Inspection Scope Limit
Scope Limitation State
Linked
Scope Limitation State
C100
Text References:
"Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair."
Confidence: 0.95
State Class: Scope Limitation State
Subject: Engineer A's subconsultant engagement with VWX Architects and Engineers
Active Period: From Engineer A's retention as subconsultant through the completion of the bridge inspection engagement
Triggering Event: VWX Architects and Engineers retains Engineer A as its subconsultant with a scope of work solely to identify pavement damage
Terminated By: Completion of the bridge inspection engagement
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • VWX Architects and Engineers
  • Public agency
Urgency Level: low
[facts] "VWX Architects and Engineers retains the services of Engineer A, a civil engineer, as its subconsultant to perform bridge inspection services on the bridge. Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to ide..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A’s scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge and report the damage to VWX for further review and repair.
  • stateClass content: Scope Limitation State
  • subject content: Engineer A's subconsultant engagement with VWX Architects and Engineers
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A's retention as subconsultant through the completion of the bridge inspection engagement
  • triggeringEvent content: VWX Architects and Engineers retains Engineer A as its subconsultant with a scope of work solely to identify pavement damage
  • terminatedBy content: Completion of the bridge inspection engagement
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; VWX Architects and Engineers; Public agency
  • confidence assessment: 0.95
  • urgencyLevel assessment: low
changed
Defective Bridge Wall Hazard
Public Safety Risk State
Linked
Public Safety Risk State
C100
Text References:
"Engineer A notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall close to where the accident involving Police Officer B occurred"
"The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B."
Confidence: 0.93
State Class: Public Safety Risk State
Subject: The bridge wall bearing an apparent pre-existing defective condition
Active Period: From before the accident involving Police Officer B and continuing while the defective condition remains unrepaired
Triggering Event: The pre-existing defective condition arose in the bridge wall before the accident
Terminated By: Repair of the defective wall condition, which the case does not report occurring
Affected Parties:
  • The public traveling across the bridge
  • Police Officer B
  • Public agency
Urgency Level: critical
[facts] "While conducting the bridge inspection, and although not part of the scope of services for which he was retained, Engineer A notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall close to w..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall close to where the accident involving Police Officer B occurred; The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B.
  • stateClass content: Public Safety Risk State
  • subject content: The bridge wall bearing an apparent pre-existing defective condition
  • activePeriod content: From before the accident involving Police Officer B and continuing while the defective condition remains unrepaired
  • triggeringEvent content: The pre-existing defective condition arose in the bridge wall before the accident
  • terminatedBy content: Repair of the defective wall condition, which the case does not report occurring
  • affectedParties content: The public traveling across the bridge; Police Officer B; Public agency
  • confidence assessment: 0.93
  • urgencyLevel assessment: critical
changed
Wall Defect Report Omission
Selective Reporting State
Linked
Selective Reporting State
C100
Text References:
"Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested."
"Engineer A does not report this information to any other public agency or authority."
Confidence: 0.9
State Class: Selective Reporting State
Subject: Engineer A's final report and engineering notes concerning the wall defect information
Active Period: From Engineer A's agreement to exclude the information onward
Triggering Event: Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested
Terminated By: Inclusion of the information in a report or other formal disclosure, which the case does not report occurring
Affected Parties:
  • Public agency
  • VWX Architects and Engineers
  • The public traveling across the bridge
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested. Engineer A does not report this information to any other public a..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested.; Engineer A does not report this information to any other public agency or authority.
  • stateClass content: Selective Reporting State
  • subject content: Engineer A's final report and engineering notes concerning the wall defect information
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A's agreement to exclude the information onward
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested
  • terminatedBy content: Inclusion of the information in a report or other formal disclosure, which the case does not report occurring
  • affectedParties content: Public agency; VWX Architects and Engineers; The public traveling across the bridge
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
changed
Public Agency Defect Awareness
Authority Awareness State
Review
Authority Awareness State
C100
Text References:
"Engineer A verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency."
Confidence: 0.85
State Class: Authority Awareness State
Subject: The public agency responsible for the bridge
Active Period: From the public agency's verbal receipt of the wall defect information onward
Triggering Event: VWX Architects and Engineers verbally reports the wall defect information to the public agency
Terminated By: Resolution of the wall defect matter by the public agency, which the case does not report
Affected Parties:
  • Public agency
  • Engineer A
  • VWX Architects and Engineers
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A verbally reports this information to his client, which then verbally reports the information to the public agency.
  • stateClass content: Authority Awareness State
  • subject content: The public agency responsible for the bridge
  • activePeriod content: From the public agency's verbal receipt of the wall defect information onward
  • triggeringEvent content: VWX Architects and Engineers verbally reports the wall defect information to the public agency
  • terminatedBy content: Resolution of the wall defect matter by the public agency, which the case does not report
  • affectedParties content: Public agency; Engineer A; VWX Architects and Engineers
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium

Rs Resources

Resources Classes
1
changed
Reference Material
rdfs:subClassOf Resources
Linked
Reference Material
C100
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
Documentation supporting professional practice, including engineering records, notes, and reports produced or relied on during professional services.
Inherited from ReferenceMaterial · note
Handbooks, manuals, guides, and other documentation supporting professional practice with technical and procedural knowledge.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes."
"Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested."
Confidence: 0.75
Resource Category: reference_material
[facts] "Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes.; Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested.
  • resourceCategory content: reference_material
  • confidence assessment: 0.75
Resources Individuals
2
Engineer A Engineering Notes
Reference Material
Linked
Reference Material
C100
Text References:
"Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes."
"Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested."
Confidence: 0.72
Resource Class: Reference Material
Document Title: engineering notes
Topic: apparent pre-existing defective condition in the bridge wall
Used By: Engineer A
[facts] "Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • usedBy: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A surmises that the defective condition may have been a contributing factor in the wall failure and notes this in his engineering notes.; Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested.
  • resourceClass content: Reference Material
  • documentTitle content: engineering notes
  • topic content: apparent pre-existing defective condition in the bridge wall
  • confidence assessment: 0.72
Engineer A Final Report
Reference Material
Linked
Reference Material
C100
Text References:
"asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work"
"Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested."
Confidence: 0.7
Resource Class: Reference Material
Document Title: final report
Topic: bridge inspection findings on pavement damage
Used By: VWX Architects and Engineers
[facts] "The public agency contacts VWX Architects and Engineers which then contacts Engineer A and asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his s..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • usedBy: VWX Architects and Engineers
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work; Engineer A states that he will retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested.
  • resourceClass content: Reference Material
  • documentTitle content: final report
  • topic content: bridge inspection findings on pavement damage
  • confidence assessment: 0.7
Pass 1: Contextual Framework - Facts
Review extracted entities, then continue to the next step
Continue to Discussion Review
Case texts: National Society of Professional Engineers, Board of Ethical Review.

NOTE: The NSPE Board of Ethical Review considers ethical cases involving either real or hypothetical matters submitted to it from NSPE members, other engineers, public officials, and members of the public. The BER reviews each case in the context of the NSPE Code of Ethics and earlier BER opinions. The facts contained in each case do not necessarily represent all of the pertinent facts submitted to or reviewed by the BER and shall not be considered a direct evaluation of any real matter that may have been submitted.

Each opinion is intended as guidance to individual practicing engineers, students, and the public. In regard to the question of application of the NSPE Code of Ethics to engineering organizations (e.g., corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, government agencies, and university engineering departments), the specific business form or type should not negate nor detract from the conformance of individuals to the Code. The NSPE Code deals with professional services, which must be performed by real persons. Real persons in turn establish and implement policies within business structures.

This opinion is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. It may be reprinted without further permission, provided that this statement is included before or after the text of the case and appropriate attribution is provided to the National Society of Professional Engineers' Board of Ethical Review.

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3