This page shows the pre-commit working store (the raw extraction under review). This case was committed to OntServe on 2026-07-14 05:36; the committed record differs by design (deduplication, typing, and agent binding are applied at commit). View the committed record
Overview
Provenance Draft

PASS 3: Temporal Dynamics

Case 133: Public Health and Safety—Knowledge of Potentially Dangerous Condition

46 entities 6 actions 6 events 8 causal chains 25 temporal relations
Timeline Overview
Action Event 16 sequenced markers
Barn Design and Construction Start of timeline, four years before the sale
June 2000, within the hour of the inspector's call on a Friday afternoon
June 2000, precedent case
Property Sale Four years after the barn was built
Structural Modification After purchasing the property
Municipal Approval During and after the extension construction
Verbal Safety Notification After learning of the extension and issuance of the certificate of occupancy
Supervisor Inaction Following Engineer A's verbal contact
Weeks after the closure, following the rally and petition
After the County Commission refused to reopen the bridge
Structural Weakening After the property sale, when Jones extends the barn
Certificate Issuance After the extension is built and approved by the town
Extension Discovery After the extension is built and the certificate of occupancy issued
Barricade Vandalism The Monday following the Friday closure, precedent case
Bridge Structural Movement After the bridge was reopened with the five-ton limit, precedent case
OWL-Time Temporal Structure 25 relations time: = w3.org/2006/time
extension is built time:intervalBefore certificate of occupancy is issued
Engineer A designs and builds the barn time:intervalBefore sale of property to Jones
sale of property to Jones time:intervalBefore Jones proposes and builds the barn extension
removal of portions of columns and footings time:intervalDuring barn extension project
town approval of changes time:intervalBefore extension is built
extension is built time:intervalBefore Engineer A learns of the extension
Engineer A learns of the extension time:intervalBefore Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor
Engineer A contacts the town supervisor time:intervalBefore town supervisor's inaction (no action taken)
bridge construction (1950s) time:intervalBefore bridge inspector's telephone call (June 2000)
bridge inspector's telephone call time:intervalBefore erection of barricades and signs
erection of barricades (Friday) time:intervalBefore barricades found dumped in river (following Monday)
barricades found dumped in river time:intervalBefore installation of more permanent barricades and signs
bridge closure time:intervalBefore detailed inspection report delivered
detailed inspection report time:intervalBefore authorization for bridge replacement
residents' 10-mile detour time:intervalDuring bridge closure
rally and petition to reopen the bridge time:intervalDuring bridge replacement effort/closure period
authorization for replacement time:intervalBefore preliminary site investigation and environmental/geological/right-of-way studies
retired bridge inspector's examination time:intervalBefore installation of two crutch piles and reopening with five-ton limit
bridge reopening with five-ton limit time:intervalBefore Engineer A observing traffic flow and significant bridge movement
no follow-up inspection time:intervalAfter installation of crutch piles and bridge reopening
notifying the current owner of concerns time:intervalBefore written notification to the town supervisor
verbal communication with town supervisor time:intervalBefore written confirmation to town supervisor
written confirmation and monitoring time:intervalBefore second written contact with town supervisor
second written contact / expiration of specified deadline time:intervalBefore escalation to county or state building officials
monitoring of the situation time:intervalDuring waiting period after written notification
Extracted Actions (6)
Volitional professional decisions with intentions and ethical context

Description: Engineer A designs and builds a barn with horse stalls on his own property.

Temporal Marker: Start of timeline, four years before the sale interval

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Structurally Sound Barn Exists

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Provide a structurally sound barn with horse stalls on his property

Required Capabilities:
Structural design competence Construction knowledge
Within Competence: Yes
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • requiresCapability: Structural design competence; Construction knowledge
  • initiates: Structurally Sound Barn Exists
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A designs and builds a barn with horse stalls on his own property.
  • hasAgent content: Engineer A
  • temporalMarker content: Start of timeline, four years before the sale
  • eventRoleContext content: Professional Engineer, property owner
  • hasMentalState content: deliberate
  • intendedOutcome content: Provide a structurally sound barn with horse stalls on his property
  • textReferences content: Engineer A designs and builds a barn with horse stalls on his property.
  • temporalExtent content: interval
  • temporalSequence content: 4
  • withinCompetence assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Barn_Design_and_Construction",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076036+00:00",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A designs and builds a barn with horse stalls on his own property.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Professional Engineer, property owner",
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Structurally Sound Barn Exists"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Provide a structurally sound barn with horse stalls on his property",
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Structural design competence",
    "Construction knowledge"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Start of timeline, four years before the sale",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 4,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer A designs and builds a barn with horse stalls on his property."
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Barn Design and Construction"
}

Description: Engineer A sells the property, including the barn, to Jones four years after construction.

Temporal Marker: Four years after the barn was built instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Jones Owns the Barn
Terminates (1)
  • Engineer A Owns the Barn

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Transfer ownership of the property and barn to Jones

Foreseen Unintended Effects:

  • Loss of control over future modifications to the structure
Within Competence: Yes
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • initiates: Jones Owns the Barn
  • terminates: Engineer A Owns the Barn
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A sells the property, including the barn, to Jones four years after construction.
  • hasAgent content: Engineer A
  • temporalMarker content: Four years after the barn was built
  • eventRoleContext content: Professional Engineer, property owner
  • hasMentalState content: deliberate
  • intendedOutcome content: Transfer ownership of the property and barn to Jones
  • foreseenUnintendedEffects content: Loss of control over future modifications to the structure
  • textReferences content: Four years later, Engineer A sells the property, including the barn, to Jones.
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 5
  • withinCompetence assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Property_Sale",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076271+00:00",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A sells the property, including the barn, to Jones four years after construction.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Professional Engineer, property owner",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Loss of control over future modifications to the structure"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Jones Owns the Barn"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Transfer ownership of the property and barn to Jones",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Four years after the barn was built",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 5,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Engineer A Owns the Barn"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Four years later, Engineer A sells the property, including the barn, to Jones."
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Property Sale"
}

Description: Jones extends the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof.

Temporal Marker: After purchasing the property interval

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Structural Collapse Risk Under Snow Loads
Terminates (1)
  • Structurally Sound Barn Exists

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Enlarge the barn through an extension

Required Capabilities:
Structural engineering judgment
Within Competence: No
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • requiresCapability: Structural engineering judgment
  • initiates: Structural Collapse Risk Under Snow Loads
  • terminates: Structurally Sound Barn Exists
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Jones extends the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof.
  • hasAgent content: Jones
  • temporalMarker content: After purchasing the property
  • eventRoleContext content: property owner, non-engineer
  • hasMentalState content: deliberate
  • intendedOutcome content: Enlarge the barn through an extension
  • textReferences content: Jones proposes to extend the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof.
  • temporalExtent content: interval
  • temporalSequence content: 6
  • withinCompetence assessment: False
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Structural_Modification",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076317+00:00",
  "proeth:description": "Jones extends the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "property owner, non-engineer",
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Jones",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Structural Collapse Risk Under Snow Loads"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Enlarge the barn through an extension",
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Structural engineering judgment"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After purchasing the property",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 6,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Structurally Sound Barn Exists"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Jones proposes to extend the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof."
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Structural Modification"
}

Description: The town approves Jones's changes, the extension is built, and a certificate of occupancy is issued for the modified barn.

Temporal Marker: During and after the extension construction instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Extension Officially Approved and Occupied

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Authorize the barn extension and certify it for occupancy

Required Capabilities:
Building code review
Within Competence: Yes
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • requiresCapability: Building code review
  • initiates: Extension Officially Approved and Occupied
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: The town approves Jones's changes, the extension is built, and a certificate of occupancy is issued for the modified barn.
  • hasAgent content: Town officials
  • temporalMarker content: During and after the extension construction
  • eventRoleContext content: municipal building authority
  • hasMentalState content: deliberate
  • intendedOutcome content: Authorize the barn extension and certify it for occupancy
  • textReferences content: The changes were approved by the town and the extension is built and a certificate of occupancy is issued.
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 8
  • withinCompetence assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Municipal_Approval",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076348+00:00",
  "proeth:description": "The town approves Jones\u0027s changes, the extension is built, and a certificate of occupancy is issued for the modified barn.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "municipal building authority",
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Town officials",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Extension Officially Approved and Occupied"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Authorize the barn extension and certify it for occupancy",
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Building code review"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "During and after the extension construction",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 8,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "The changes were approved by the town and the extension is built and a certificate of occupancy is issued."
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Municipal Approval"
}

Description: Engineer A, concerned that the structure may collapse under severe snow loads, verbally contacts the town supervisor to raise the safety concern.

Temporal Marker: After learning of the extension and issuance of the certificate of occupancy instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Safety Concern Verbally Reported to Authority

Mental State: concerned and deliberate

Intended Outcome: Prompt the town supervisor to investigate and address the potential structural danger

Obligation Engagement:
At stake (1)
  • Obligation to point out situations impacting public health and safety
Guided By Principles:
  • Public Health and Safety
Required Capabilities:
Structural engineering judgment Hazard assessment
Within Competence: Yes
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • guidedByPrinciple: Public Health and Safety
  • requiresCapability: Structural engineering judgment; Hazard assessment
  • initiates: Safety Concern Verbally Reported to Authority
  • raisesObligation: Obligation to point out situations impacting public health and safety
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A, concerned that the structure may collapse under severe snow loads, verbally contacts the town supervisor to raise the safety concern.
  • hasAgent content: Engineer A
  • temporalMarker content: After learning of the extension and issuance of the certificate of occupancy
  • eventRoleContext content: Professional Engineer, former owner
  • hasMentalState content: concerned and deliberate
  • intendedOutcome content: Prompt the town supervisor to investigate and address the potential structural danger
  • textReferences content: Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads. Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 11
  • withinCompetence assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Verbal_Safety_Notification",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076375+00:00",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A, concerned that the structure may collapse under severe snow loads, verbally contacts the town supervisor to raise the safety concern.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Professional Engineer, former owner",
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Public Health and Safety"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "concerned and deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Safety Concern Verbally Reported to Authority"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Prompt the town supervisor to investigate and address the potential structural danger",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [
    "Obligation to point out situations impacting public health and safety"
  ],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Structural engineering judgment",
    "Hazard assessment"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After learning of the extension and issuance of the certificate of occupancy",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 11,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads. Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor"
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Verbal Safety Notification"
}

Description: The town supervisor agrees to look into the matter raised by Engineer A but takes no action, an omission the case treats as the supervisor's conduct.

Temporal Marker: Following Engineer A's verbal contact interval

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Reported Hazard Left Unaddressed

Mental State: acknowledging but passive

Intended Outcome: Signal willingness to look into the matter

Foreseen Unintended Effects:

  • Continued exposure of the structure to collapse risk
Required Capabilities:
Administrative authority over building safety matters
Within Competence: Yes
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • requiresCapability: Administrative authority over building safety matters
  • initiates: Reported Hazard Left Unaddressed
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: The town supervisor agrees to look into the matter raised by Engineer A but takes no action, an omission the case treats as the supervisor's conduct.
  • hasAgent content: Town supervisor
  • temporalMarker content: Following Engineer A's verbal contact
  • eventRoleContext content: local government official
  • hasMentalState content: acknowledging but passive
  • intendedOutcome content: Signal willingness to look into the matter
  • foreseenUnintendedEffects content: Continued exposure of the structure to collapse risk
  • textReferences content: Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action is taken.
  • temporalExtent content: interval
  • temporalSequence content: 12
  • withinCompetence assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Supervisor_Inaction",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076402+00:00",
  "proeth:description": "The town supervisor agrees to look into the matter raised by Engineer A but takes no action, an omission the case treats as the supervisor\u0027s conduct.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "local government official",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Continued exposure of the structure to collapse risk"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Town supervisor",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "acknowledging but passive",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Reported Hazard Left Unaddressed"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Signal willingness to look into the matter",
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Administrative authority over building safety matters"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Following Engineer A\u0027s verbal contact",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 12,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action is taken."
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Supervisor Inaction"
}
Extracted Events (6)
Occurrences that trigger ethical considerations and state changes

Description: In the precedent case, the barricades erected to close the bridge were found dumped in the river and the Bridge Closed sign was found beyond the trees, removing the physical protection of the closure until more permanent barricades were installed.

Temporal Marker: The Monday following the Friday closure, precedent case instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Unprotected Hazard Condition
Terminates (1)
  • Barricade Protection
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • initiates: Unprotected Hazard Condition
  • terminates: Barricade Protection
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: In the precedent case, the barricades erected to close the bridge were found dumped in the river and the Bridge Closed sign was found beyond the trees, removing the physical protection of the closure until more permanent barricades were installed.
  • temporalMarker content: The Monday following the Friday closure, precedent case
  • textReferences content: On the following Monday, the barricades were found dumped in the river, and the “Bridge Closed” sign was found beyond the trees by the roadway.
  • eventType content: exogenous
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 1
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Event_Barricade_Vandalism",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076560+00:00",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.9",
  "proeth:description": "In the precedent case, the barricades erected to close the bridge were found dumped in the river and the Bridge Closed sign was found beyond the trees, removing the physical protection of the closure until more permanent barricades were installed.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Unprotected Hazard Condition"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "The Monday following the Friday closure, precedent case",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 1,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Barricade Protection"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "On the following Monday, the barricades were found dumped in the river, and the \u201cBridge Closed\u201d sign was found beyond the trees by the roadway."
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Barricade Vandalism"
}

Description: In the precedent case, log trucks and tankers crossed the weight-restricted bridge on a regular basis while school buses went around it, so the five-ton limit was not being observed and the collapse risk persisted.

Temporal Marker: After the bridge was reopened with the five-ton limit, precedent case interval

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Weight Limit Violation Condition
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • initiates: Weight Limit Violation Condition
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: In the precedent case, log trucks and tankers crossed the weight-restricted bridge on a regular basis while school buses went around it, so the five-ton limit was not being observed and the collapse risk persisted.
  • temporalMarker content: After the bridge was reopened with the five-ton limit, precedent case
  • textReferences content: Log trucks and tankers crossed it on a regular basis, while school buses went around it.
  • eventType content: exogenous
  • temporalExtent content: interval
  • temporalSequence content: 2
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Event_Heavy_Vehicle_Crossings",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076605+00:00",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.85",
  "proeth:description": "In the precedent case, log trucks and tankers crossed the weight-restricted bridge on a regular basis while school buses went around it, so the five-ton limit was not being observed and the collapse risk persisted.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Weight Limit Violation Condition"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After the bridge was reopened with the five-ton limit, precedent case",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 2,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Log trucks and tankers crossed it on a regular basis, while school buses went around it."
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Heavy Vehicle Crossings"
}

Description: In the precedent case, after the bridge was reopened with crutch piles and a five-ton limit, Engineer A observed traffic flowing and significant movement of the bridge, indicating continuing structural danger.

Temporal Marker: After the bridge was reopened with the five-ton limit, precedent case interval

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Ongoing Collapse Risk

Caused By Action: Action_Unlicensed_Inspection_Arrangement

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • causedByAction: http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Unlicensed_Inspection_Arrangement
  • initiates: Ongoing Collapse Risk
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: In the precedent case, after the bridge was reopened with crutch piles and a five-ton limit, Engineer A observed traffic flowing and significant movement of the bridge, indicating continuing structural danger.
  • temporalMarker content: After the bridge was reopened with the five-ton limit, precedent case
  • textReferences content: Engineer A observed that traffic is flowing and the significant movement of the bridge
  • eventType content: outcome
  • temporalExtent content: interval
  • temporalSequence content: 3
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Event_Bridge_Structural_Movement",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076584+00:00",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Unlicensed_Inspection_Arrangement",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.85",
  "proeth:description": "In the precedent case, after the bridge was reopened with crutch piles and a five-ton limit, Engineer A observed traffic flowing and significant movement of the bridge, indicating continuing structural danger.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Ongoing Collapse Risk"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After the bridge was reopened with the five-ton limit, precedent case",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 3,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer A observed that traffic is flowing and the significant movement of the bridge"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Bridge Structural Movement"
}

Description: As a consequence of Jones removing portions of the load-bearing columns and footings during the barn extension, the barn structure becomes vulnerable to collapse under severe snow loads.

Temporal Marker: After the property sale, when Jones extends the barn instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Collapse Risk Under Snow Loads
Terminates (1)
  • Structurally Sound Barn

Caused By Action: Action_Structural_Modification

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • causedByAction: http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Structural_Modification
  • initiates: Collapse Risk Under Snow Loads
  • terminates: Structurally Sound Barn
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: As a consequence of Jones removing portions of the load-bearing columns and footings during the barn extension, the barn structure becomes vulnerable to collapse under severe snow loads.
  • temporalMarker content: After the property sale, when Jones extends the barn
  • textReferences content: removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof; the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads
  • eventType content: outcome
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 7
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Event_Structural_Weakening",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076477+00:00",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Structural_Modification",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.9",
  "proeth:description": "As a consequence of Jones removing portions of the load-bearing columns and footings during the barn extension, the barn structure becomes vulnerable to collapse under severe snow loads.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Collapse Risk Under Snow Loads"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After the property sale, when Jones extends the barn",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 7,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Structurally Sound Barn"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof",
    "the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Structural Weakening"
}

Description: Following town approval of the changes and completion of the extension, a certificate of occupancy is issued for the modified barn, giving the altered structure official occupancy status.

Temporal Marker: After the extension is built and approved by the town instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Certified Occupancy of Modified Structure

Caused By Action: Action_Municipal_Approval

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • causedByAction: http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Municipal_Approval
  • initiates: Certified Occupancy of Modified Structure
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Following town approval of the changes and completion of the extension, a certificate of occupancy is issued for the modified barn, giving the altered structure official occupancy status.
  • temporalMarker content: After the extension is built and approved by the town
  • textReferences content: The changes were approved by the town and the extension is built and a certificate of occupancy is issued.
  • eventType content: automatic
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 9
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Event_Certificate_Issuance",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076512+00:00",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Municipal_Approval",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.9",
  "proeth:description": "Following town approval of the changes and completion of the extension, a certificate of occupancy is issued for the modified barn, giving the altered structure official occupancy status.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventType": "automatic",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Certified Occupancy of Modified Structure"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After the extension is built and approved by the town",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 9,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "The changes were approved by the town and the extension is built and a certificate of occupancy is issued."
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Certificate Issuance"
}

Description: Engineer A learns of the barn extension and becomes concerned that the structure may collapse under severe snow loads, which brings the safety issue to his professional attention.

Temporal Marker: After the extension is built and the certificate of occupancy issued instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Engineer Awareness of Collapse Risk

Caused By Action: Action_Structural_Modification

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • causedByAction: http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Structural_Modification
  • initiates: Engineer Awareness of Collapse Risk
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A learns of the barn extension and becomes concerned that the structure may collapse under severe snow loads, which brings the safety issue to his professional attention.
  • temporalMarker content: After the extension is built and the certificate of occupancy issued
  • textReferences content: Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads.
  • eventType content: outcome
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 10
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Event_Extension_Discovery",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076539+00:00",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#Action_Structural_Modification",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.9",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A learns of the barn extension and becomes concerned that the structure may collapse under severe snow loads, which brings the safety issue to his professional attention.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Engineer Awareness of Collapse Risk"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After the extension is built and the certificate of occupancy issued",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 10,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads."
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Extension Discovery"
}
Causal Chains (8)
NESS test analysis: Necessary Element of Sufficient Set

Causal Language: Jones proposes to extend the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Removal of portions of load-bearing columns and footings
  • Columns and footings serving as roof support
  • Extension work proceeding without adequate structural analysis
Sufficient Factors:
  • Removal of critical roof-supporting elements during extension construction
Counterfactual Test: Had Jones extended the barn without removing the columns and footings, or replaced their load capacity, the structure would not have been weakened against severe snow loads.
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Jones (property owner)
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Structural Modification
    Jones proposes and undertakes a barn extension
  2. Column and Footing Removal
    Portions of the columns and footings that support the roof are removed
  3. Structural Weakening
    The barn's capacity to resist severe snow loads is compromised, creating collapse risk
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Structural Modification
  • effect: Structural Weakening
  • responsibleAgent: Jones (property owner)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: Jones proposes to extend the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof.
  • necessaryFactors content: Removal of portions of load-bearing columns and footings; Columns and footings serving as roof support; Extension work proceeding without adequate structural analysis
  • sufficientFactors content: Removal of critical roof-supporting elements during extension construction
  • counterfactual content: Had Jones extended the barn without removing the columns and footings, or replaced their load capacity, the structure would not have been weakened against severe snow loads.
  • agentKnowledge content: Jones knew the columns and footings were being removed but presumably lacked awareness of the structural risk under severe snow loads
  • interveningFactors content: Town approval of the changes lent apparent legitimacy to the modification
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Structural Modification', 'proeth:description': 'Jones proposes and undertakes a barn extension'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Column and Footing Removal', 'proeth:description': 'Portions of the columns and footings that support the roof are removed'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Structural Weakening', 'proeth:description': "The barn's capacity to resist severe snow loads is compromised, creating collapse risk"}
  • responsibilityType assessment: direct
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#CausalChain_1",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076664+00:00",
  "proeth:agentKnowledge": "Jones knew the columns and footings were being removed but presumably lacked awareness of the structural risk under severe snow loads",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Jones proposes to extend the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and footings that support the roof.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Jones proposes and undertakes a barn extension",
      "proeth:element": "Structural Modification",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Portions of the columns and footings that support the roof are removed",
      "proeth:element": "Column and Footing Removal",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "The barn\u0027s capacity to resist severe snow loads is compromised, creating collapse risk",
      "proeth:element": "Structural Weakening",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Structural Modification",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Had Jones extended the barn without removing the columns and footings, or replaced their load capacity, the structure would not have been weakened against severe snow loads.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Structural Weakening",
  "proeth:interveningFactors": [
    "Town approval of the changes lent apparent legitimacy to the modification"
  ],
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Removal of portions of load-bearing columns and footings",
    "Columns and footings serving as roof support",
    "Extension work proceeding without adequate structural analysis"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Jones (property owner)",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Removal of critical roof-supporting elements during extension construction"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: The changes were approved by the town and the extension is built and a certificate of occupancy is issued.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Town approval of Jones's proposed changes
  • Completion of the extension construction
  • Municipal certification process treating the structure as compliant
Sufficient Factors:
  • Approval plus completed construction satisfying the town's certification procedure
Counterfactual Test: Without town approval, the certificate of occupancy would not have been issued and the structurally compromised extension would not have been officially sanctioned.
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Town approval authorities
Type: shared
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Structural Modification
    Jones proposes the barn extension including removal of roof supports
  2. Municipal Approval
    The town approves the changes
  3. Extension Construction
    The extension is built
  4. Certificate Issuance
    A certificate of occupancy is issued, officially sanctioning the compromised structure
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Municipal Approval
  • effect: Certificate Issuance
  • responsibleAgent: Town approval authorities
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: The changes were approved by the town and the extension is built and a certificate of occupancy is issued.
  • necessaryFactors content: Town approval of Jones's proposed changes; Completion of the extension construction; Municipal certification process treating the structure as compliant
  • sufficientFactors content: Approval plus completed construction satisfying the town's certification procedure
  • counterfactual content: Without town approval, the certificate of occupancy would not have been issued and the structurally compromised extension would not have been officially sanctioned.
  • agentKnowledge content: The town reviewed the proposed changes but apparently did not detect the compromise to the roof support system
  • interveningFactors content: Jones's submission of the extension plans; Apparent absence of engineering review of the column and footing removal
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Structural Modification', 'proeth:description': 'Jones proposes the barn extension including removal of roof supports'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Municipal Approval', 'proeth:description': 'The town approves the changes'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Extension Construction', 'proeth:description': 'The extension is built'}; {'proeth:step': 4, 'proeth:element': 'Certificate Issuance', 'proeth:description': 'A certificate of occupancy is issued, officially sanctioning the compromised structure'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: shared
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#CausalChain_2",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076694+00:00",
  "proeth:agentKnowledge": "The town reviewed the proposed changes but apparently did not detect the compromise to the roof support system",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "The changes were approved by the town and the extension is built and a certificate of occupancy is issued.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Jones proposes the barn extension including removal of roof supports",
      "proeth:element": "Structural Modification",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "The town approves the changes",
      "proeth:element": "Municipal Approval",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "The extension is built",
      "proeth:element": "Extension Construction",
      "proeth:step": 3
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "A certificate of occupancy is issued, officially sanctioning the compromised structure",
      "proeth:element": "Certificate Issuance",
      "proeth:step": 4
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Municipal Approval",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without town approval, the certificate of occupancy would not have been issued and the structurally compromised extension would not have been officially sanctioned.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Certificate Issuance",
  "proeth:interveningFactors": [
    "Jones\u0027s submission of the extension plans",
    "Apparent absence of engineering review of the column and footing removal"
  ],
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Town approval of Jones\u0027s proposed changes",
    "Completion of the extension construction",
    "Municipal certification process treating the structure as compliant"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "shared",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Town approval authorities",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Approval plus completed construction satisfying the town\u0027s certification procedure"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads. Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action is taken.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Engineer A learning of the extension
  • Engineer A's professional knowledge of the barn's original structural design
  • Engineer A's concern about collapse under severe snow loads
Sufficient Factors:
  • Discovery of the modification combined with Engineer A's professional recognition of the collapse danger
Counterfactual Test: Had Engineer A never learned of the extension, no safety notification to the town supervisor would have occurred and the hazard would have remained unreported.
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Engineer A
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Extension Discovery
    Engineer A learns of the barn extension
  2. Risk Recognition
    Engineer A becomes concerned the structure may collapse under severe snow loads
  3. Verbal Safety Notification
    Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor about the danger
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Extension Discovery
  • effect: Verbal Safety Notification
  • responsibleAgent: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads. Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action is taken.
  • necessaryFactors content: Engineer A learning of the extension; Engineer A's professional knowledge of the barn's original structural design; Engineer A's concern about collapse under severe snow loads
  • sufficientFactors content: Discovery of the modification combined with Engineer A's professional recognition of the collapse danger
  • counterfactual content: Had Engineer A never learned of the extension, no safety notification to the town supervisor would have occurred and the hazard would have remained unreported.
  • agentKnowledge content: As the original designer, Engineer A knew the columns and footings were essential to resisting severe snow loads
  • interveningFactors content: Engineer A no longer owned the property and had no direct authority over it
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Extension Discovery', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A learns of the barn extension'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Risk Recognition', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A becomes concerned the structure may collapse under severe snow loads'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Verbal Safety Notification', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor about the danger'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: direct
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#CausalChain_3",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076716+00:00",
  "proeth:agentKnowledge": "As the original designer, Engineer A knew the columns and footings were essential to resisting severe snow loads",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads. Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action is taken.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A learns of the barn extension",
      "proeth:element": "Extension Discovery",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A becomes concerned the structure may collapse under severe snow loads",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Recognition",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor about the danger",
      "proeth:element": "Verbal Safety Notification",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Extension Discovery",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Had Engineer A never learned of the extension, no safety notification to the town supervisor would have occurred and the hazard would have remained unreported.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Verbal Safety Notification",
  "proeth:interveningFactors": [
    "Engineer A no longer owned the property and had no direct authority over it"
  ],
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer A learning of the extension",
    "Engineer A\u0027s professional knowledge of the barn\u0027s original structural design",
    "Engineer A\u0027s concern about collapse under severe snow loads"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Discovery of the modification combined with Engineer A\u0027s professional recognition of the collapse danger"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action is taken.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Verbal-only form of the notification with no written record
  • Town supervisor's discretion over whether to act
  • Absence of follow-up or escalation by Engineer A
Sufficient Factors:
  • An informal verbal report without written confirmation or a deadline for action, combined with supervisor discretion, was enough to result in no corrective action
Counterfactual Test: Per the Board's guidance, written notification with follow-up and escalation to county or state building officials would likely have prompted corrective action; verbal contact alone left the hazard unaddressed.
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Town supervisor
Type: shared
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Verbal Safety Notification
    Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor about the collapse risk
  2. Supervisor Agreement
    The town supervisor agrees to look into the matter
  3. Supervisor Inaction
    No action is taken, leaving the structural hazard unremedied
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Verbal Safety Notification
  • effect: Supervisor Inaction
  • responsibleAgent: Town supervisor
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action is taken.
  • necessaryFactors content: Verbal-only form of the notification with no written record; Town supervisor's discretion over whether to act; Absence of follow-up or escalation by Engineer A
  • sufficientFactors content: An informal verbal report without written confirmation or a deadline for action, combined with supervisor discretion, was enough to result in no corrective action
  • counterfactual content: Per the Board's guidance, written notification with follow-up and escalation to county or state building officials would likely have prompted corrective action; verbal contact alone left the hazard unaddressed.
  • agentKnowledge content: The supervisor was informed of the collapse concern and agreed to look into the matter
  • interveningFactors content: Informal, undocumented nature of Engineer A's verbal communication; Existing certificate of occupancy suggesting municipal compliance
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Verbal Safety Notification', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor about the collapse risk'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Supervisor Agreement', 'proeth:description': 'The town supervisor agrees to look into the matter'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Supervisor Inaction', 'proeth:description': 'No action is taken, leaving the structural hazard unremedied'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: shared
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#CausalChain_4",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076736+00:00",
  "proeth:agentKnowledge": "The supervisor was informed of the collapse concern and agreed to look into the matter",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action is taken.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor about the collapse risk",
      "proeth:element": "Verbal Safety Notification",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "The town supervisor agrees to look into the matter",
      "proeth:element": "Supervisor Agreement",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "No action is taken, leaving the structural hazard unremedied",
      "proeth:element": "Supervisor Inaction",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Verbal Safety Notification",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Per the Board\u0027s guidance, written notification with follow-up and escalation to county or state building officials would likely have prompted corrective action; verbal contact alone left the hazard unaddressed.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Supervisor Inaction",
  "proeth:interveningFactors": [
    "Informal, undocumented nature of Engineer A\u0027s verbal communication",
    "Existing certificate of occupancy suggesting municipal compliance"
  ],
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Verbal-only form of the notification with no written record",
    "Town supervisor\u0027s discretion over whether to act",
    "Absence of follow-up or escalation by Engineer A"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "shared",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Town supervisor",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "An informal verbal report without written confirmation or a deadline for action, combined with supervisor discretion, was enough to result in no corrective action"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: In June 2000, Engineer A received a telephone call from the bridge inspector stating this bridge needed to be closed due to the large number of rotten piling. Engineer A had barricades and signs erected within the hour on a Friday afternoon.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Large number of rotten pilings on the aging 1950s bridge
  • Bridge inspector's discovery and report of the deterioration
  • Engineer A's authority as a local government engineer to close the bridge
Sufficient Factors:
  • The inspector's report of dangerous piling deterioration combined with Engineer A's authority and prompt response
Counterfactual Test: Without the piling deterioration and the inspector's report, there would have been no basis or trigger for the emergency closure.
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Engineer A (BER Case No. 00-5, local government engineer)
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Bridge Piling Deterioration
    A large number of the wood pilings supporting the 1950s bridge are rotten
  2. Inspector's Report
    The bridge inspector telephones Engineer A stating the bridge needs to be closed
  3. Emergency Bridge Closure
    Engineer A has barricades and signs erected within the hour
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Bridge Piling Deterioration
  • effect: Emergency Bridge Closure
  • responsibleAgent: Engineer A (BER Case No. 00-5, local government engineer)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: In June 2000, Engineer A received a telephone call from the bridge inspector stating this bridge needed to be closed due to the large number of rotten piling. Engineer A had barricades and signs erected within the hour on a Friday afternoon.
  • necessaryFactors content: Large number of rotten pilings on the aging 1950s bridge; Bridge inspector's discovery and report of the deterioration; Engineer A's authority as a local government engineer to close the bridge
  • sufficientFactors content: The inspector's report of dangerous piling deterioration combined with Engineer A's authority and prompt response
  • counterfactual content: Without the piling deterioration and the inspector's report, there would have been no basis or trigger for the emergency closure.
  • agentKnowledge content: Engineer A knew from the inspector's call that the bridge needed to be closed due to rotten pilings
  • interveningFactors content: Decades of deferred maintenance and 'the myriad of patchwork over the years'
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Bridge Piling Deterioration', 'proeth:description': 'A large number of the wood pilings supporting the 1950s bridge are rotten'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': "Inspector's Report", 'proeth:description': 'The bridge inspector telephones Engineer A stating the bridge needs to be closed'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Emergency Bridge Closure', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A has barricades and signs erected within the hour'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: direct
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#CausalChain_5",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076754+00:00",
  "proeth:agentKnowledge": "Engineer A knew from the inspector\u0027s call that the bridge needed to be closed due to rotten pilings",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "In June 2000, Engineer A received a telephone call from the bridge inspector stating this bridge needed to be closed due to the large number of rotten piling. Engineer A had barricades and signs erected within the hour on a Friday afternoon.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "A large number of the wood pilings supporting the 1950s bridge are rotten",
      "proeth:element": "Bridge Piling Deterioration",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "The bridge inspector telephones Engineer A stating the bridge needs to be closed",
      "proeth:element": "Inspector\u0027s Report",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A has barricades and signs erected within the hour",
      "proeth:element": "Emergency Bridge Closure",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Bridge Piling Deterioration",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the piling deterioration and the inspector\u0027s report, there would have been no basis or trigger for the emergency closure.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:effect": "Emergency Bridge Closure",
  "proeth:interveningFactors": [
    "Decades of deferred maintenance and \u0027the myriad of patchwork over the years\u0027"
  ],
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Large number of rotten pilings on the aging 1950s bridge",
    "Bridge inspector\u0027s discovery and report of the deterioration",
    "Engineer A\u0027s authority as a local government engineer to close the bridge"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A (BER Case No. 00-5, local government engineer)",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "The inspector\u0027s report of dangerous piling deterioration combined with Engineer A\u0027s authority and prompt response"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: On the following Monday, the barricades were found dumped in the river, and the “Bridge Closed” sign was found beyond the trees by the roadway.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Barricades and signs physically present at the closed bridge
  • Public frustration with the 10-mile detour
  • Unsecured, removable initial barricades
Sufficient Factors:
  • Closure imposing a burdensome detour combined with easily removable barricades and motivated members of the public
Counterfactual Test: Without the closure and the resulting detour burden, there would have been no barricades to vandalize; more permanent barricades from the outset would likely have prevented the removal.
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Unknown vandals (members of the public)
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Emergency Bridge Closure
    Barricades and 'Bridge Closed' signs are erected
  2. Detour Burden
    Residents are required to take a 10-mile detour
  3. Barricade Vandalism
    Barricades are found dumped in the river and the sign thrown beyond the trees
  4. Reinforced Closure
    More permanent barricades and signs are installed
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Emergency Bridge Closure
  • effect: Barricade Vandalism
  • responsibleAgent: Unknown vandals (members of the public)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: On the following Monday, the barricades were found dumped in the river, and the “Bridge Closed” sign was found beyond the trees by the roadway.
  • necessaryFactors content: Barricades and signs physically present at the closed bridge; Public frustration with the 10-mile detour; Unsecured, removable initial barricades
  • sufficientFactors content: Closure imposing a burdensome detour combined with easily removable barricades and motivated members of the public
  • counterfactual content: Without the closure and the resulting detour burden, there would have been no barricades to vandalize; more permanent barricades from the outset would likely have prevented the removal.
  • agentKnowledge content: The vandals knew the bridge was posted as closed and removed the barricades anyway
  • interveningFactors content: Residents in the area were required to take a 10-mile detour
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Emergency Bridge Closure', 'proeth:description': "Barricades and 'Bridge Closed' signs are erected"}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Detour Burden', 'proeth:description': 'Residents are required to take a 10-mile detour'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Barricade Vandalism', 'proeth:description': 'Barricades are found dumped in the river and the sign thrown beyond the trees'}; {'proeth:step': 4, 'proeth:element': 'Reinforced Closure', 'proeth:description': 'More permanent barricades and signs are installed'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: direct
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#CausalChain_6",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076772+00:00",
  "proeth:agentKnowledge": "The vandals knew the bridge was posted as closed and removed the barricades anyway",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "On the following Monday, the barricades were found dumped in the river, and the \u201cBridge Closed\u201d sign was found beyond the trees by the roadway.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Barricades and \u0027Bridge Closed\u0027 signs are erected",
      "proeth:element": "Emergency Bridge Closure",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Residents are required to take a 10-mile detour",
      "proeth:element": "Detour Burden",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Barricades are found dumped in the river and the sign thrown beyond the trees",
      "proeth:element": "Barricade Vandalism",
      "proeth:step": 3
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "More permanent barricades and signs are installed",
      "proeth:element": "Reinforced Closure",
      "proeth:step": 4
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Emergency Bridge Closure",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the closure and the resulting detour burden, there would have been no barricades to vandalize; more permanent barricades from the outset would likely have prevented the removal.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:effect": "Barricade Vandalism",
  "proeth:interveningFactors": [
    "Residents in the area were required to take a 10-mile detour"
  ],
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Barricades and signs physically present at the closed bridge",
    "Public frustration with the 10-mile detour",
    "Unsecured, removable initial barricades"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Unknown vandals (members of the public)",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Closure imposing a burdensome detour combined with easily removable barricades and motivated members of the public"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: A nonengineer public works director decided to have a retired bridge inspector, who was not an engineer, examine the bridge, and a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a five-ton limit.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Nonengineer director's decision to use an unlicensed retired inspector
  • Decision to reopen the bridge based on the unlicensed examination
  • Absence of follow-up inspection or enforcement of the five-ton limit
Sufficient Factors:
  • Reopening the deficient bridge on unlicensed advice without weight-limit enforcement was sufficient to permit heavy vehicle crossings
Counterfactual Test: Had the bridge remained closed pending replacement, or had the five-ton limit been strictly enforced, log trucks and tankers could not have crossed it regularly.
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Nonengineer public works director (BER Case No. 00-5)
Type: shared
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Unlicensed Inspection Arrangement
    The nonengineer director has a retired, unlicensed bridge inspector examine the bridge
  2. Crutch Pile Reopening
    Two crutch piles are installed and the bridge is opened with a five-ton limit
  3. No Follow-up Inspection
    No follow-up inspection is undertaken and the limit is not enforced
  4. Heavy Vehicle Crossings
    Log trucks and tankers cross the weight-restricted bridge on a regular basis
  5. Bridge Structural Movement
    Engineer A observes significant movement of the bridge under traffic
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Unlicensed Inspection Arrangement
  • effect: Heavy Vehicle Crossings
  • responsibleAgent: Nonengineer public works director (BER Case No. 00-5)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: A nonengineer public works director decided to have a retired bridge inspector, who was not an engineer, examine the bridge, and a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a five-ton limit.
  • necessaryFactors content: Nonengineer director's decision to use an unlicensed retired inspector; Decision to reopen the bridge based on the unlicensed examination; Absence of follow-up inspection or enforcement of the five-ton limit
  • sufficientFactors content: Reopening the deficient bridge on unlicensed advice without weight-limit enforcement was sufficient to permit heavy vehicle crossings
  • counterfactual content: Had the bridge remained closed pending replacement, or had the five-ton limit been strictly enforced, log trucks and tankers could not have crossed it regularly.
  • agentKnowledge content: The director knew the bridge had been closed for rotten pilings and that a licensed engineering firm had documented deficiencies, yet substituted an unlicensed examination
  • interveningFactors content: Public pressure including a rally and petition with approximately 200 signatures; Heavy vehicle operators disregarding the five-ton limit
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Unlicensed Inspection Arrangement', 'proeth:description': 'The nonengineer director has a retired, unlicensed bridge inspector examine the bridge'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Crutch Pile Reopening', 'proeth:description': 'Two crutch piles are installed and the bridge is opened with a five-ton limit'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'No Follow-up Inspection', 'proeth:description': 'No follow-up inspection is undertaken and the limit is not enforced'}; {'proeth:step': 4, 'proeth:element': 'Heavy Vehicle Crossings', 'proeth:description': 'Log trucks and tankers cross the weight-restricted bridge on a regular basis'}; {'proeth:step': 5, 'proeth:element': 'Bridge Structural Movement', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A observes significant movement of the bridge under traffic'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: shared
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#CausalChain_7",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076797+00:00",
  "proeth:agentKnowledge": "The director knew the bridge had been closed for rotten pilings and that a licensed engineering firm had documented deficiencies, yet substituted an unlicensed examination",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "A nonengineer public works director decided to have a retired bridge inspector, who was not an engineer, examine the bridge, and a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a five-ton limit.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "The nonengineer director has a retired, unlicensed bridge inspector examine the bridge",
      "proeth:element": "Unlicensed Inspection Arrangement",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Two crutch piles are installed and the bridge is opened with a five-ton limit",
      "proeth:element": "Crutch Pile Reopening",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "No follow-up inspection is undertaken and the limit is not enforced",
      "proeth:element": "No Follow-up Inspection",
      "proeth:step": 3
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Log trucks and tankers cross the weight-restricted bridge on a regular basis",
      "proeth:element": "Heavy Vehicle Crossings",
      "proeth:step": 4
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A observes significant movement of the bridge under traffic",
      "proeth:element": "Bridge Structural Movement",
      "proeth:step": 5
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Unlicensed Inspection Arrangement",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Had the bridge remained closed pending replacement, or had the five-ton limit been strictly enforced, log trucks and tankers could not have crossed it regularly.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:effect": "Heavy Vehicle Crossings",
  "proeth:interveningFactors": [
    "Public pressure including a rally and petition with approximately 200 signatures",
    "Heavy vehicle operators disregarding the five-ton limit"
  ],
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Nonengineer director\u0027s decision to use an unlicensed retired inspector",
    "Decision to reopen the bridge based on the unlicensed examination",
    "Absence of follow-up inspection or enforcement of the five-ton limit"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "shared",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Nonengineer public works director (BER Case No. 00-5)",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Reopening the deficient bridge on unlicensed advice without weight-limit enforcement was sufficient to permit heavy vehicle crossings"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Existence of the compromised, weakened structure
  • Engineer A's original knowledge of the barn's structural design
  • Information about the extension reaching Engineer A
Sufficient Factors:
  • The physically altered structure becoming known to the original designer who could recognize its danger
Counterfactual Test: If the columns and footings had not been compromised, learning of the extension would not have generated a collapse concern; there would be no hazard to discover.
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Jones (creator of the condition discovered)
Type: indirect
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Structural Weakening
    The barn's roof support is compromised by the column and footing removal
  2. Certificate Issuance
    The extension is completed and a certificate of occupancy is issued
  3. Extension Discovery
    Engineer A learns of the extension and recognizes the danger of collapse under severe snow loads
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Structural Weakening
  • effect: Extension Discovery
  • responsibleAgent: Jones (creator of the condition discovered)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads.
  • necessaryFactors content: Existence of the compromised, weakened structure; Engineer A's original knowledge of the barn's structural design; Information about the extension reaching Engineer A
  • sufficientFactors content: The physically altered structure becoming known to the original designer who could recognize its danger
  • counterfactual content: If the columns and footings had not been compromised, learning of the extension would not have generated a collapse concern; there would be no hazard to discover.
  • agentKnowledge content: Jones made the modifications; Engineer A had no involvement or knowledge until after the certificate of occupancy was issued
  • interveningFactors content: Town approval and certificate of occupancy having concluded the official review process before discovery
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Structural Weakening', 'proeth:description': "The barn's roof support is compromised by the column and footing removal"}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Certificate Issuance', 'proeth:description': 'The extension is completed and a certificate of occupancy is issued'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Extension Discovery', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A learns of the extension and recognizes the danger of collapse under severe snow loads'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: indirect
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD 
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#CausalChain_8",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "generatedAtTime": "2026-07-13T22:50:51.076815+00:00",
  "proeth:agentKnowledge": "Jones made the modifications; Engineer A had no involvement or knowledge until after the certificate of occupancy was issued",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse due to severe snow loads.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "The barn\u0027s roof support is compromised by the column and footing removal",
      "proeth:element": "Structural Weakening",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "The extension is completed and a certificate of occupancy is issued",
      "proeth:element": "Certificate Issuance",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A learns of the extension and recognizes the danger of collapse under severe snow loads",
      "proeth:element": "Extension Discovery",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Structural Weakening",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "If the columns and footings had not been compromised, learning of the extension would not have generated a collapse concern; there would be no hazard to discover.",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Extension Discovery",
  "proeth:interveningFactors": [
    "Town approval and certificate of occupancy having concluded the official review process before discovery"
  ],
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Existence of the compromised, weakened structure",
    "Engineer A\u0027s original knowledge of the barn\u0027s structural design",
    "Information about the extension reaching Engineer A"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "indirect",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Jones (creator of the condition discovered)",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "The physically altered structure becoming known to the original designer who could recognize its danger"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}
Allen Temporal Relations (25)
Interval algebra relationships with OWL-Time standard properties
From Entity Allen Relation To Entity OWL-Time Property Evidence
extension is built before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		certificate of occupancy is issued time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		the extension is built and a certificate of occupancy is issued
Engineer A designs and builds the barn before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		sale of property to Jones time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Engineer A designs and builds a barn with horse stalls on his property. Four years later, Engineer A... [more]
sale of property to Jones before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		Jones proposes and builds the barn extension time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Four years later, Engineer A sells the property... Later, Jones proposes to extend the barn
removal of portions of columns and footings during
Entity1 occurs entirely within the duration of Entity2 		barn extension project time:intervalDuring
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalDuring 		Jones proposes to extend the barn and, as part of the extension, removes portions of the columns and... [more]
town approval of changes before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		extension is built time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		The changes were approved by the town and the extension is built
extension is built before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		Engineer A learns of the extension time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned that the structure may be in danger of collapse ... [more]
Engineer A learns of the extension before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Engineer A learns of the extension and is concerned... Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervi... [more]
Engineer A contacts the town supervisor before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		town supervisor's inaction (no action taken) time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Engineer A verbally contacts the town supervisor who agrees to look into the matter, but no action i... [more]
bridge construction (1950s) before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		bridge inspector's telephone call (June 2000) time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		a concrete deck on wood piles built in the 1950s by the state... In June 2000, Engineer A received a... [more]
bridge inspector's telephone call before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		erection of barricades and signs time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Engineer A received a telephone call from the bridge inspector stating this bridge needed to be clos... [more]
erection of barricades (Friday) before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		barricades found dumped in river (following Monday) time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		barricades and signs erected within the hour on a Friday afternoon... On the following Monday, the b... [more]
barricades found dumped in river before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		installation of more permanent barricades and signs time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		the barricades were found dumped in the river... More permanent barricades and signs were installed.
bridge closure before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		detailed inspection report delivered time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Within a few days, a detailed inspection report prepared by a consulting engineering firm, signed an... [more]
detailed inspection report before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		authorization for bridge replacement time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Within a few days, a detailed inspection report... Within three weeks, Engineer A had obtained autho... [more]
residents' 10-mile detour during
Entity1 occurs entirely within the duration of Entity2 		bridge closure time:intervalDuring
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalDuring 		Residents in the area were required to take a 10-mile detour.
rally and petition to reopen the bridge during
Entity1 occurs entirely within the duration of Entity2 		bridge replacement effort/closure period time:intervalDuring
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalDuring 		A rally was held, and a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopene... [more]
authorization for replacement before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		preliminary site investigation and environmental/geological/right-of-way studies time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		Engineer A had obtained authorization for the bridge to be replaced... Preliminary site investigatio... [more]
retired bridge inspector's examination before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		installation of two crutch piles and reopening with five-ton limit time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		a decision was made to have a retired bridge inspector... examine the bridge, and a decision was mad... [more]
bridge reopening with five-ton limit before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		Engineer A observing traffic flow and significant bridge movement time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a five-... [more]
no follow-up inspection after
Entity1 is after Entity2 		installation of crutch piles and bridge reopening time:intervalAfter
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalAfter 		a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a five-... [more]
notifying the current owner of concerns before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		written notification to the town supervisor time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		it would have been more appropriate to first notify the current owner of his concerns regarding the ... [more]
verbal communication with town supervisor before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		written confirmation to town supervisor time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		follow the verbal communication up with a written confirmation to the town supervisor, restating Eng... [more]
written confirmation and monitoring before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		second written contact with town supervisor time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		continue to monitor the situation. If appropriate steps are not taken within a reasonable period of ... [more]
second written contact / expiration of specified deadline before
Entity1 is before Entity2 		escalation to county or state building officials time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore 		indicate that if steps are not taken within a specific period of time to adequately address the situ... [more]
monitoring of the situation during
Entity1 occurs entirely within the duration of Entity2 		waiting period after written notification time:intervalDuring
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalDuring 		restating Engineer A's concern and continue to monitor the situation. If appropriate steps are not t... [more]
About Allen Relations & OWL-Time

Allen's Interval Algebra provides 13 basic temporal relations between intervals. These relations are mapped to OWL-Time standard properties for interoperability with Semantic Web temporal reasoning systems and SPARQL queries.

Each relation includes both a ProEthica custom property and a time:* OWL-Time property for maximum compatibility.

Back to Extraction Continue to Step 4

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3