This page shows the pre-commit working store (the raw extraction under review). This case was committed to OntServe on 2026-10-24 07:57; the committed record differs by design (deduplication, typing, and agent binding are applied at commit). View the committed record
Overview
Facts Discussion
Provenance Draft

PASS 1: Contextual Framework Facts Section

Case 134: Statements Made During Negotiations

R Roles
2
Classes
3
Individuals
S States
3
Classes
3
Individuals
Rs Resources
0
Classes
0
Individuals

Extracted Ontology Entities

11 RDF entities extracted organized by concept type

R Roles

Roles Classes
2
changed
EngineerRole
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
New C134
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
An engineer acting as the chief negotiator in a business transaction, here the sale of an engineering subsidiary, representing the selling organization and making representations to the counterparty to advance the negotiations.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B."
"In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had ..."
Confidence: 0.85
Role Category: employer_relationship
Role Kind: professional
Distinguishing Features:
  • Represents the selling organization in a business transaction rather than performing technical engineering work
  • Makes representations to the negotiation counterparty in order to advance and close the deal
Professional Scope: Conducting and advancing negotiations for the sale of a business unit on behalf of the organization the negotiator represents, including communicating the state of interest from other potential buyers.
Typical Qualifications: Engineer with standing to represent the organization in the transaction
Associated Virtues:
  • Honesty
  • Truthfulness in statements to negotiation counterparties
[facts] "Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.; In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had better move quickly if you are interested.”
  • roleCategory content: employer_relationship
  • roleKind content: professional
  • distinguishingFeatures content: Represents the selling organization in a business transaction rather than performing technical engineering work; Makes representations to the negotiation counterparty in order to advance and close the deal
  • professionalScope content: Conducting and advancing negotiations for the sale of a business unit on behalf of the organization the negotiator represents, including communicating the state of interest from other potential buyers.
  • typicalQualifications content: Engineer with standing to represent the organization in the transaction
  • associatedVirtues content: Honesty; Truthfulness in statements to negotiation counterparties
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
changed
ClientRole
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
New C134
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A party considering or negotiating the purchase of a business unit offered for sale, who may express, withhold, or withdraw interest in the acquisition. Carries standing in the case without profession-generated duties articulated by the case.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling."
"Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary."
Confidence: 0.8
Role Kind: participant
Distinguishing Features:
  • Standing in the case arises from interest in or negotiation toward purchasing the subsidiary, not from any professional engagement
  • Bears no profession-generated obligations articulated by the case
[facts] "Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling.; Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary.
  • roleKind content: participant
  • distinguishingFeatures content: Standing in the case arises from interest in or negotiation toward purchasing the subsidiary, not from any professional engagement; Bears no profession-generated obligations articulated by the case
  • confidence assessment: 0.8
Roles Individuals
3
New C134
Text References:
"Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B."
"In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had ..."
Confidence: 0.9
Actor: Engineer A
Role Class: Negotiator
Role Category: employer_relationship
Role Kind: professional
Employer: Parent company selling the subsidiary
Additional Relationships: {'type': 'negotiatesSaleWith', 'target': 'Engineer B', 'quote': 'Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.'}
Case Involvement: Acting as chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary, Engineer A wants to finalize the deal and, referring to Engineer C's earlier and since withdrawn interest, tells Engineer B that another company has expressed an interest in buying the subsidiary so Engineer B had better move quickly.
Negotiation position: chief negotiator for the seller
Employedby: Parent company selling the subsidiary
"Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had better move quickly if you are interested."
[facts] "Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer A
  • attributes: {'negotiation_position': 'chief negotiator for the seller'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'employedBy', 'target': 'Parent company selling the subsidiary', 'quote': 'Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had better move quickly if you are interested.'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.; In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had better move quickly if you are interested.”
  • roleClass content: Negotiator
  • roleCategory content: employer_relationship
  • roleKind content: professional
  • employer content: Parent company selling the subsidiary
  • additionalRelationships content: {'type': 'negotiatesSaleWith', 'target': 'Engineer B', 'quote': 'Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.'}
  • caseInvolvement content: Acting as chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary, Engineer A wants to finalize the deal and, referring to Engineer C's earlier and since withdrawn interest, tells Engineer B that another company has expressed an interest in buying the subsidiary so Engineer B had better move quickly.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
New C134
Text References:
"Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B."
"Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling."
Confidence: 0.9
Actor: Engineer B
Role Class: Prospective Purchaser
Role Kind: participant
Additional Relationships: {'type': 'negotiatesPurchaseWith', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.'}
Case Involvement: The prospective purchaser of the small engineering subsidiary who has been stalling the negotiations and is the recipient of Engineer A's statement that another company has expressed an interest in buying the subsidiary.
Negotiation conduct: has been stalling the negotiations
[facts] "Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer B
  • attributes: {'negotiation_conduct': 'has been stalling the negotiations'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.; Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling.
  • roleClass content: Prospective Purchaser
  • roleKind content: participant
  • additionalRelationships content: {'type': 'negotiatesPurchaseWith', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.'}
  • caseInvolvement content: The prospective purchaser of the small engineering subsidiary who has been stalling the negotiations and is the recipient of Engineer A's statement that another company has expressed an interest in buying the subsidiary.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
New C134
Text References:
"Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary."
Confidence: 0.85
Actor: Engineer C
Role Class: Prospective Purchaser
Role Kind: participant
Case Involvement: Expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary but after consideration decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing it. Her earlier interest is what Engineer A refers to when telling Engineer B that another company has expressed an interest.
Interest status: expressed initial interest, then decided she was definitely not interested
[facts] "Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer C
  • attributes: {'interest_status': 'expressed initial interest, then decided she was definitely not interested'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary.
  • roleClass content: Prospective Purchaser
  • roleKind content: participant
  • caseInvolvement content: Expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary but after consideration decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing it. Her earlier interest is what Engineer A refers to when telling Engineer B that another company has expressed an interest.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85

S States

States Classes
3
changed
Pending Negotiation State
rdfs:subClassOf States
New C134
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A temporal condition in which a sale or contract negotiation is underway and unresolved, so the parties act within the window before the deal is finalized or abandoned. Here the negotiation for the sale of a small engineering subsidiary is in progress, with the seller's negotiator seeking to move it forward while the prospective buyer stalls.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B."
"Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling."
Confidence: 0.88
State Category: temporal
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Negotiations for the sale of the subsidiary commence between the seller and the prospective buyer
Termination Conditions:
  • The sale is finalized
  • The negotiations break off or are abandoned
Obligation Activation: Truthfulness In Professional Dealings Obligation
Principle Transformation: While the negotiation is pending, the honesty principle governs the representations the negotiator may make to the counterparty to influence the pace of the deal.
[facts] "Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B. Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.; Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling.
  • stateCategory content: temporal
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: While the negotiation is pending, the honesty principle governs the representations the negotiator may make to the counterparty to influence the pace of the deal.
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Negotiations for the sale of the subsidiary commence between the seller and the prospective buyer
  • terminationConditions: The sale is finalized; The negotiations break off or are abandoned
  • obligationActivation: Truthfulness In Professional Dealings Obligation
changed
Withdrawn Interest State
rdfs:subClassOf States
New C134
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
An epistemic condition in which a prospective party who earlier expressed interest in a transaction has, following consideration, definitively decided against it, so any representation of continuing interest by that party is contrary to fact. Here Engineer C expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary but then decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing it.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary."
Confidence: 0.87
State Category: epistemic
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: The prospective party, after consideration, decides definitely against the purchase
Termination Conditions: The party renews its interest in the transaction
Action Constraints: Prohibition on representing the withdrawn interest as a live competing interest
Principle Transformation: Once the interest is definitively withdrawn, the honesty principle makes any invocation of that interest as a current competing offer a misleading representation.
[facts] "Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary.
  • stateCategory content: epistemic
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: Once the interest is definitively withdrawn, the honesty principle makes any invocation of that interest as a current competing offer a misleading representation.
  • confidence assessment: 0.87
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: The prospective party, after consideration, decides definitely against the purchase
  • terminationConditions: The party renews its interest in the transaction
  • actionConstraints: Prohibition on representing the withdrawn interest as a live competing interest
changed
Deceptive Intent State
rdfs:subClassOf States
Review
Deceptive Intent State
C134
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
An epistemic condition in which a professional's representation is intentionally designed to mislead the recipient by obscuring the truth. Here Engineer A, in an effort to move the negotiations forward, refers to Engineer C's earlier interest and tells Engineer B that another company has expressed an interest in buying the subsidiary, implying a live competing buyer when Engineer C has definitely decided against purchasing.
Inherited from DeceptiveIntentState · note
An epistemic condition in which a professional's representations are intentionally designed to mislead a recipient by obscuring the truth, as distinguished from unintentionally false or inaccurate statements, which the Board stresses are not unethical per se. Here Engineer A's resume implications about personal responsibility for team-designed products are found to be intentionally designed to mislead a potential employer.
Properties
Text References:
"In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had ..."
Confidence: 0.9
State Category: epistemic
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: The professional makes a representation designed to mislead the recipient about a material fact
Termination Conditions:
  • The professional corrects the misleading representation
  • The recipient learns the true state of affairs
Obligation Activation: Truthfulness In Professional Dealings Obligation
Action Constraints: Prohibition on deceptive statements in negotiations
Principle Transformation: The honesty principle becomes the concrete duty to correct or refrain from a representation that implies a live competing buyer where none exists.
[facts] "In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had ..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had better move quickly if you are interested.”
  • stateCategory content: epistemic
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The honesty principle becomes the concrete duty to correct or refrain from a representation that implies a live competing buyer where none exists.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: The professional makes a representation designed to mislead the recipient about a material fact
  • terminationConditions: The professional corrects the misleading representation; The recipient learns the true state of affairs
  • obligationActivation: Truthfulness In Professional Dealings Obligation
  • actionConstraints: Prohibition on deceptive statements in negotiations
States Individuals
3
changed
Subsidiary Sale Negotiation Pending
PendingNegotiationState
New C134
Text References:
"Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B."
"Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling."
Confidence: 0.88
State Class: Pending Negotiation State
Subject: The negotiation for the sale of the small engineering subsidiary between Engineer A, as chief negotiator for the seller, and Engineer B
Active Period: From the start of the sale negotiations until the deal is finalized or the negotiations end
Triggering Event: Negotiations begin for the sale of the small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B
Terminated By: Finalization of the sale or abandonment of the negotiations
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Engineer B
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B. Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is acting as the chief negotiator in the sale of a small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B.; Engineer A wants to move the negotiations forward to finalize the deal but Engineer B has been stalling.
  • stateClass content: Pending Negotiation State
  • subject content: The negotiation for the sale of the small engineering subsidiary between Engineer A, as chief negotiator for the seller, and Engineer B
  • activePeriod content: From the start of the sale negotiations until the deal is finalized or the negotiations end
  • triggeringEvent content: Negotiations begin for the sale of the small engineering subsidiary to Engineer B
  • terminatedBy content: Finalization of the sale or abandonment of the negotiations
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; Engineer B
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
New C134
Text References:
"Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary."
Confidence: 0.87
State Class: Withdrawn Interest State
Subject: Engineer C, whose initial interest in buying the subsidiary has been definitively withdrawn
Active Period: From Engineer C's decision after consideration onward, throughout the negotiations with Engineer B
Triggering Event: Following consideration, Engineer C decides she is definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary
Terminated By: Not terminated in the case, Engineer C's decision stands as definite
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer C
  • Engineer A
  • Engineer B
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer C had expressed some initial interest in buying the subsidiary, but following consideration, Engineer C decided she was definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary.
  • stateClass content: Withdrawn Interest State
  • subject content: Engineer C, whose initial interest in buying the subsidiary has been definitively withdrawn
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer C's decision after consideration onward, throughout the negotiations with Engineer B
  • triggeringEvent content: Following consideration, Engineer C decides she is definitely not interested in purchasing the subsidiary
  • terminatedBy content: Not terminated in the case, Engineer C's decision stands as definite
  • affectedParties content: Engineer C; Engineer A; Engineer B
  • confidence assessment: 0.87
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
Misleading Competing Buyer Claim
Deceptive Intent State
Review
Deceptive Intent State
C134
Text References:
"In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had ..."
Confidence: 0.9
State Class: Deceptive Intent State
Subject: Engineer A, whose statement to Engineer B invokes Engineer C's earlier interest as a live competing interest in order to pressure Engineer B to move quickly
Active Period: From Engineer A's statement to Engineer B until the representation is corrected or the true facts become known to Engineer B
Triggering Event: Engineer A tells Engineer B that another company has expressed an interest in buying the subsidiary, referring to Engineer C's earlier interest
Terminated By: Correction of the representation or Engineer B learning that Engineer C is definitely not interested
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer B
  • Engineer A
  • Engineer C
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had ..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: In an effort to move the negotiations forward, referring to Engineer C’s earlier interest, Engineer A tells Engineer B, “Another company has expressed an interest in buying our subsidiary, so you had better move quickly if you are interested.”
  • stateClass content: Deceptive Intent State
  • subject content: Engineer A, whose statement to Engineer B invokes Engineer C's earlier interest as a live competing interest in order to pressure Engineer B to move quickly
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A's statement to Engineer B until the representation is corrected or the true facts become known to Engineer B
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A tells Engineer B that another company has expressed an interest in buying the subsidiary, referring to Engineer C's earlier interest
  • terminatedBy content: Correction of the representation or Engineer B learning that Engineer C is definitely not interested
  • affectedParties content: Engineer B; Engineer A; Engineer C
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high

Rs Resources

No new resources were extracted for this section.

The extraction did not find any resources to add. This typically means the case text doesn't contain relevant resources for this section, or extraction hasn't been run yet.

Pass 1: Contextual Framework - Facts
Review extracted entities, then continue to the next step
Continue to Discussion Review
Case texts: National Society of Professional Engineers, Board of Ethical Review.

NOTE: The NSPE Board of Ethical Review considers ethical cases involving either real or hypothetical matters submitted to it from NSPE members, other engineers, public officials, and members of the public. The BER reviews each case in the context of the NSPE Code of Ethics and earlier BER opinions. The facts contained in each case do not necessarily represent all of the pertinent facts submitted to or reviewed by the BER and shall not be considered a direct evaluation of any real matter that may have been submitted.

Each opinion is intended as guidance to individual practicing engineers, students, and the public. In regard to the question of application of the NSPE Code of Ethics to engineering organizations (e.g., corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, government agencies, and university engineering departments), the specific business form or type should not negate nor detract from the conformance of individuals to the Code. The NSPE Code deals with professional services, which must be performed by real persons. Real persons in turn establish and implement policies within business structures.

This opinion is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. It may be reprinted without further permission, provided that this statement is included before or after the text of the case and appropriate attribution is provided to the National Society of Professional Engineers' Board of Ethical Review.

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3