This page shows the pre-commit working store (the raw extraction under review). This case was committed to OntServe on 2026-10-24 07:56; the committed record differs by design (deduplication, typing, and agent binding are applied at commit). View the committed record
Overview
Facts Discussion
Provenance Draft

PASS 1: Contextual Framework Facts Section

Case 60: Misrepresentation of Qualifications

R Roles
0
Classes
2
Individuals
S States
5
Classes
5
Individuals
Rs Resources
1
Classes
1
Individuals

Extracted Ontology Entities

14 RDF entities extracted organized by concept type

R Roles

Roles Classes
0
No new roles classes were identified in this section.
Roles Individuals
2
No new roles classes were discovered - the 2 individual(s) below reference existing classes from the ontology.
Engineer A Forensic Expert Witness
Forensic Expert Witness Engineer Role
Linked
Forensic Expert Witness Engineer Role
C60
Text References:
"Engineer A is a licensed Professional Engineer in three states (C, D, and E) and is a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering."
"Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony."
"Engineer A signs the report as “Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering,” making no reference whatsoever to licensure status."
Confidence: 0.92
Actor: Engineer A
Role Class: Forensic Expert Witness Engineer Role
Role Category: provider_client
Role Kind: professional
License: Licensed Professional Engineer in States C, D, and E; not licensed in State M
Specialty: Forensic Engineering
Technical Background: Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering
Case Involvement: Agreed to evaluate the case for Attorney X, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony in State M, where the licensing statute requires State M licensure for engineers providing expert testimony, and signed the report as Consultant A with no reference to licensure status.
Certification: Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering
Report signature: Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering
Hasclient: Attorney X
"Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M. Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepar..."
[facts] "Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer A
  • attributes: {'certification': 'Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering', 'report_signature': 'Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'hasClient', 'target': 'Attorney X', 'quote': 'Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M. Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony.'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is a licensed Professional Engineer in three states (C, D, and E) and is a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering.; Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony.; Engineer A signs the report as “Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering,” making no reference whatsoever to licensure status.
  • roleClass content: Forensic Expert Witness Engineer Role
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • roleKind content: professional
  • license content: Licensed Professional Engineer in States C, D, and E; not licensed in State M
  • specialty content: Forensic Engineering
  • technicalBackground content: Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering
  • caseInvolvement content: Agreed to evaluate the case for Attorney X, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony in State M, where the licensing statute requires State M licensure for engineers providing expert testimony, and signed the report as Consultant A with no reference to licensure status.
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
Linked
Client Role
C60
Text References:
"Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M."
Confidence: 0.88
Actor: Attorney X
Role Class: Client Role
Role Kind: participant
Additional Relationships: {'type': 'retains expert services of', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M.'}
Case Involvement: Contacted Engineer A seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M, thereby commissioning the case evaluation, expert opinion, and testimony.
[facts] "Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Attorney X
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M.
  • roleClass content: Client Role
  • roleKind content: participant
  • additionalRelationships content: {'type': 'retains expert services of', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M.'}
  • caseInvolvement content: Contacted Engineer A seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M, thereby commissioning the case evaluation, expert opinion, and testimony.
  • confidence assessment: 0.88

S States

States Classes
5
changed
Statutory Requirement State
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Statutory Requirement State
C60
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A regulatory condition in which a state statute places a requirement in force for a class of parties, here the State M licensing statute requiring that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M.
Inherited from StatutoryRequirementState · note
A regulatory condition in which a state statute places a requirement in force for a class of parties, here a state law requiring that every municipality have a municipal engineer whose duties and compensation are to be fixed by a municipal ordinance.
Properties
Text References:
"The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M."
Confidence: 0.95
State Category: regulatory
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Enactment of the State M licensing statute governing expert testimony by engineers
Termination Conditions: Repeal or amendment of the State M licensing statute
Obligation Activation: Obligation to hold State M licensure before providing expert testimony in a State M court
Action Constraints: Constraint barring engineers not licensed in State M from providing expert testimony in State M courts
Principle Transformation: The principle of lawful practice becomes the concrete requirement that an engineer testifying in a State M court be licensed in State M.
[facts] "The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M.
  • stateCategory content: regulatory
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The principle of lawful practice becomes the concrete requirement that an engineer testifying in a State M court be licensed in State M.
  • confidence assessment: 0.95
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Enactment of the State M licensing statute governing expert testimony by engineers
  • terminationConditions: Repeal or amendment of the State M licensing statute
  • obligationActivation: Obligation to hold State M licensure before providing expert testimony in a State M court
  • actionConstraints: Constraint barring engineers not licensed in State M from providing expert testimony in State M courts
changed
Active Engagement State
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Active Engagement State
C60
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A condition in which a professional holds an engagement in force with a client, so the engagement duties currently apply, here Engineer A having agreed with Attorney X to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony.
Inherited from ActiveEngagementState · note
A condition in which a professional holds an engagement in force with a client, so the engagement duties currently apply, here Engineer A as consulting engineer representing Client B with a scope including design and local permitting of the roadway and upgrade of the tidal crossing.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony."
Confidence: 0.9
State Category: regulatory
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony
Termination Conditions:
  • Completion of the testimony engagement
  • Withdrawal from the engagement
Obligation Activation: Engagement duties owed to Attorney X for the expert services
Principle Transformation: The faithful service principle becomes the concrete duties of the agreed expert engagement with Attorney X.
[facts] "Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M. Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimo..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony.
  • stateCategory content: regulatory
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The faithful service principle becomes the concrete duties of the agreed expert engagement with Attorney X.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony
  • terminationConditions: Completion of the testimony engagement; Withdrawal from the engagement
  • obligationActivation: Engagement duties owed to Attorney X for the expert services
changed
RegulatoryViolationState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Regulatory Violation State
C60
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A regulatory condition in which a party's conduct stands out of compliance with a requirement in force, here Engineer A, licensed only in States C, D, and E, agreeing to provide expert testimony in State M where the licensing statute requires State M licensure for any engineer providing expert testimony.
Inherited from RegulatoryViolationState · note
A condition in which a policy or requirement is in force for the situation, here City policies requiring new infrastructure projects to be developed with climate resiliency in mind.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A is a licensed Professional Engineer in three states (C, D, and E) and is a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering."
"Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony."
Confidence: 0.88
State Category: regulatory
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Engineer A agrees to provide expert testimony in State M without holding State M licensure
Termination Conditions:
  • Engineer A obtains State M licensure
  • Engineer A withdraws from providing testimony in State M
Obligation Activation: Obligation to comply with the State M licensing statute governing expert testimony
Action Constraints: Constraint barring engineers not licensed in State M from providing expert testimony in State M courts
Principle Transformation: The abstract duty of lawful professional practice becomes the concrete requirement that Engineer A not testify as an engineer in State M without State M licensure.
[facts] "Engineer A is a licensed Professional Engineer in three states (C, D, and E) and is a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering. Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-e..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is a licensed Professional Engineer in three states (C, D, and E) and is a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering.; Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony.
  • stateCategory content: regulatory
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The abstract duty of lawful professional practice becomes the concrete requirement that Engineer A not testify as an engineer in State M without State M licensure.
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Engineer A agrees to provide expert testimony in State M without holding State M licensure
  • terminationConditions: Engineer A obtains State M licensure; Engineer A withdraws from providing testimony in State M
  • obligationActivation: Obligation to comply with the State M licensing statute governing expert testimony
  • actionConstraints: Constraint barring engineers not licensed in State M from providing expert testimony in State M courts
changed
SelectiveReportingState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Review
Selective Reporting State
C60
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A disclosure condition in which material information has been omitted from a delivered work product, here a signed expert report identifying the author only as a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering while making no reference whatsoever to licensure status.
Inherited from SelectiveReportingState · note
A condition of what information has been disclosed among the parties, here the state in which all available information about both design approaches, including risks and benefits, has been presented to the client's leadership.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A signs the report as “Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering,” making no reference whatsoever to licensure status."
Confidence: 0.85
State Category: disclosure
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Engineer A signs the report making no reference to licensure status
Termination Conditions: Engineer A supplements or corrects the report to state licensure status
Obligation Activation: Obligation to be truthful and not misleading in professional representations
Principle Transformation: The principle of honest representation becomes the concrete question of whether the report signature must disclose the signer's licensure status.
[facts] "Engineer A signs the report as “Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering,” making no reference whatsoever to licensure status."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A signs the report as “Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering,” making no reference whatsoever to licensure status.
  • stateCategory content: disclosure
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The principle of honest representation becomes the concrete question of whether the report signature must disclose the signer's licensure status.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Engineer A signs the report making no reference to licensure status
  • terminationConditions: Engineer A supplements or corrects the report to state licensure status
  • obligationActivation: Obligation to be truthful and not misleading in professional representations
changed
ScopeLimitationState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Review
Scope Limitation State
C60
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A condition in which a professional's engagement is limited to a defined capacity of service, here Attorney X seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony, so the engagement is framed in a non-engineering expert capacity rather than as engineering services.
Inherited from ScopeLimitationState · note
A condition in which a professional's engagement is contractually limited to a defined service, here Engineer A hired by the Homeowner only to design a retaining wall system to stabilize a rear yard, so the observed sprinkler defect lies outside the scope of the retained services.
Properties
Text References:
"Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M."
Confidence: 0.85
State Category: regulatory
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Attorney X frames the sought services as those of a non-engineering expert
Termination Conditions: The engagement ends or its capacity is redefined
Action Constraints: The engagement's non-engineering expert framing bounds the capacity in which the services are offered
Principle Transformation: The truthful representation principle becomes the concrete question of the capacity in which Engineer A serves and is presented.
[facts] "Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M.
  • stateCategory content: regulatory
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The truthful representation principle becomes the concrete question of the capacity in which Engineer A serves and is presented.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Attorney X frames the sought services as those of a non-engineering expert
  • terminationConditions: The engagement ends or its capacity is redefined
  • actionConstraints: The engagement's non-engineering expert framing bounds the capacity in which the services are offered
States Individuals
5
changed
Unlicensed State M Testimony Engagement
Regulatory Violation State
Linked
Regulatory Violation State
C60
Text References:
"Engineer A is a licensed Professional Engineer in three states (C, D, and E) and is a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering."
"Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony."
Confidence: 0.85
State Class: Regulatory Violation State
Subject: Engineer A, licensed in States C, D, and E but not in State M, engaged to provide expert testimony in State M
Active Period: From Engineer A's agreement to provide testimony in State M while unlicensed there
Triggering Event: Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony in State M
Terminated By: Engineer A obtaining State M licensure or withdrawing from the State M testimony
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Attorney X
  • State M courts
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "Engineer A is a licensed Professional Engineer in three states (C, D, and E) and is a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering. Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-e..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is a licensed Professional Engineer in three states (C, D, and E) and is a Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering.; Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony.
  • stateClass content: Regulatory Violation State
  • subject content: Engineer A, licensed in States C, D, and E but not in State M, engaged to provide expert testimony in State M
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A's agreement to provide testimony in State M while unlicensed there
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony in State M
  • terminatedBy content: Engineer A obtaining State M licensure or withdrawing from the State M testimony
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; Attorney X; State M courts
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
changed
Engineer A Expert Engagement
Active Engagement State
Linked
Active Engagement State
C60
Text References:
"Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony."
Confidence: 0.9
State Class: Active Engagement State
Subject: Engineer A, engaged by Attorney X to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony
Active Period: From Engineer A's agreement through the performance of the expert services
Triggering Event: Engineer A agrees to Attorney X's request for expert services
Terminated By: Completion of the testimony or withdrawal from the engagement
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Attorney X
Urgency Level: low
[facts] "Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M. Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimo..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A agrees to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony.
  • stateClass content: Active Engagement State
  • subject content: Engineer A, engaged by Attorney X to evaluate the case, prepare an expert opinion, and provide testimony
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A's agreement through the performance of the expert services
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A agrees to Attorney X's request for expert services
  • terminatedBy content: Completion of the testimony or withdrawal from the engagement
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; Attorney X
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
  • urgencyLevel assessment: low
changed
Licensure Status Omission In Report
Selective Reporting State
Review
Selective Reporting State
C60
Text References:
"Engineer A signs the report as “Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering,” making no reference whatsoever to licensure status."
Confidence: 0.88
State Class: Selective Reporting State
Subject: Engineer A's signed expert report, which identifies him only as Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering
Active Period: From the signing of the report onward
Triggering Event: Engineer A signs the report making no reference whatsoever to licensure status
Terminated By: Correction or supplementation of the report to disclose licensure status
Affected Parties:
  • Attorney X
  • State M courts
  • Engineer A
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A signs the report as “Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering,” making no reference whatsoever to licensure status."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A signs the report as “Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering,” making no reference whatsoever to licensure status.
  • stateClass content: Selective Reporting State
  • subject content: Engineer A's signed expert report, which identifies him only as Consultant A, Board-certified Diplomate in Forensic Engineering
  • activePeriod content: From the signing of the report onward
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A signs the report making no reference whatsoever to licensure status
  • terminatedBy content: Correction or supplementation of the report to disclose licensure status
  • affectedParties content: Attorney X; State M courts; Engineer A
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
Non-Engineering Expert Capacity
Scope Limitation State
Review
Scope Limitation State
C60
Text References:
"Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M."
Confidence: 0.85
State Class: Scope Limitation State
Subject: Engineer A's engagement, sought by Attorney X as the services of a non-engineering expert
Active Period: For the duration of the engagement with Attorney X
Triggering Event: Attorney X contacts Engineer A seeking the services of a non-engineering expert
Terminated By: The end of the engagement or a redefinition of its capacity
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Attorney X
  • State M courts
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Attorney X contacts Engineer A, seeking the services of a non-engineering expert to provide testimony in State M.
  • stateClass content: Scope Limitation State
  • subject content: Engineer A's engagement, sought by Attorney X as the services of a non-engineering expert
  • activePeriod content: For the duration of the engagement with Attorney X
  • triggeringEvent content: Attorney X contacts Engineer A seeking the services of a non-engineering expert
  • terminatedBy content: The end of the engagement or a redefinition of its capacity
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; Attorney X; State M courts
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
State M Testimony Licensure Statute
Statutory Requirement State
Linked
Statutory Requirement State
C60
Text References:
"The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M."
Confidence: 0.95
State Class: Statutory Requirement State
Subject: Expert testimony by engineers in State M courts
Active Period: Throughout the case, the statute is in force
Triggering Event: Enactment of the State M licensing statute
Terminated By: Repeal or amendment of the State M licensing statute
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Attorney X
  • State M courts
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M.
  • stateClass content: Statutory Requirement State
  • subject content: Expert testimony by engineers in State M courts
  • activePeriod content: Throughout the case, the statute is in force
  • triggeringEvent content: Enactment of the State M licensing statute
  • terminatedBy content: Repeal or amendment of the State M licensing statute
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; Attorney X; State M courts
  • confidence assessment: 0.95
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium

Rs Resources

Resources Classes
1
changed
LegalResource
rdfs:subClassOf Resources
Linked
Legal Resource
C60
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
Laws, regulations, and statutes governing professional practice that establish legal boundaries and compliance requirements for professional activities, here instanced by a state licensing statute governing expert testimony by engineers.
Inherited from LegalResource · note
Laws, regulations, and statutes governing professional practice that establish legal boundaries and compliance requirements for professional activities.
Properties
Text References:
"The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M."
Confidence: 0.92
Resource Category: legal_resource
[facts] "The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M.
  • resourceCategory content: legal_resource
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
Resources Individuals
1
Linked
Legal Resource
C60
Text References:
"The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M."
Confidence: 0.9
Resource Class: Legal Resource
Document Title: State M licensing statute
Topic: licensure requirement for engineers providing expert testimony in State M courts
[facts] "The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The licensing statute in State M specifies that any engineer providing expert testimony in a State M court must be licensed in State M.
  • resourceClass content: Legal Resource
  • documentTitle content: State M licensing statute
  • topic content: licensure requirement for engineers providing expert testimony in State M courts
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Pass 1: Contextual Framework - Facts
Review extracted entities, then continue to the next step
Continue to Discussion Review
Case texts: National Society of Professional Engineers, Board of Ethical Review.

NOTE: The NSPE Board of Ethical Review considers ethical cases involving either real or hypothetical matters submitted to it from NSPE members, other engineers, public officials, and members of the public. The BER reviews each case in the context of the NSPE Code of Ethics and earlier BER opinions. The facts contained in each case do not necessarily represent all of the pertinent facts submitted to or reviewed by the BER and shall not be considered a direct evaluation of any real matter that may have been submitted.

Each opinion is intended as guidance to individual practicing engineers, students, and the public. In regard to the question of application of the NSPE Code of Ethics to engineering organizations (e.g., corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, government agencies, and university engineering departments), the specific business form or type should not negate nor detract from the conformance of individuals to the Code. The NSPE Code deals with professional services, which must be performed by real persons. Real persons in turn establish and implement policies within business structures.

This opinion is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. It may be reprinted without further permission, provided that this statement is included before or after the text of the case and appropriate attribution is provided to the National Society of Professional Engineers' Board of Ethical Review.

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3