Overview
Facts Discussion
Provenance Draft

PASS 1: Contextual Framework Facts Section

Case 7: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Practice

R Roles
3
Classes
4
Individuals
S States
5
Classes
12
Individuals
Rs Resources
3
Classes
3
Individuals

Extracted Ontology Entities

30 RDF entities extracted organized by concept type

R Roles

Roles Classes
3
changed
Environmental Engineer
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
Review
Engineer Role
C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A professional engineering role specializing in environmental systems, contaminant analysis, groundwater monitoring, and related infrastructure design, bearing licensure-based accountability for technical reports and engineering documents delivered to clients.
Inherited from EngineerRole · note
A professional role involving engineering practice and responsibilities. Occupational archetype head for all engineer specializations and extracted engineer-role leaves.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W"
"Engineer A was tasked to develop engineering design documents (plans and specifications) for modifications to groundwater infrastructure"
Confidence: 0.88
Role Category: provider_client
[facts] "Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W; Engineer A was tasked to develop engineering design documents (plans and specifications) for modifications to groundwater infrastructure
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
changed
Mentor Engineer
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
Review
Professional Peer Role
C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A senior professional engineering role in which the practitioner provides guidance, quality assurance review, and technical mentorship to a less experienced engineer, shaping that engineer's professional development and serving as a check on technical work product.
Inherited from ProfessionalPeerRole · note
Collegial relationship with mentoring and review obligations
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts"
"Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity"
Confidence: 0.85
Role Category: professional_peer
[facts] "Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts; Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity
  • roleCategory content: professional_peer
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
changed
AI-Assisted Design Engineer
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
New C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A professional engineering role in which the practitioner uses AI-assisted drafting or synthesis tools to generate preliminary design documents or reports, while retaining full professional accountability for the accuracy, completeness, and regulatory compliance of the final work product bearing their seal.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design docum..."
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review"
"Engineer A applied their seal consistent with state law"
Confidence: 0.82
Role Category: provider_client
[facts] "Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design docum..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design documents; Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review; Engineer A applied their seal consistent with state law
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • confidence assessment: 0.82
Roles Individuals
4
Linked
Client Role
C7
Text References:
"was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report addressing the manufacture, use, and characteristics of an organic compound"
"Client W reviewed the draft report"
"Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
Confidence: 0.95
Actor: Client W
Role Class: Client Role
Role Category: provider_client
Case Involvement: Commissioned Engineer A to prepare a contaminant report and engineering design documents for a groundwater infrastructure site. Reviewed deliverables, identified quality inconsistencies in the report, and raised concerns about errors and regulatory omissions in the design documents.
Project type: Groundwater infrastructure modification
Review action: Identified misaligned dimensions and omitted safety features in design documents
Has provider: Engineer A
"Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W"
[facts] "was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report addressing the manufacture, use, and characteristics of an organic compound"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Client W
  • attributes: {'project_type': 'Groundwater infrastructure modification', 'review_action': 'Identified misaligned dimensions and omitted safety features in design documents'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'has_provider', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report addressing the manufacture, use, and characteristics of an organic compound; Client W reviewed the draft report; Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations
  • roleClass content: Client Role
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • caseInvolvement content: Commissioned Engineer A to prepare a contaminant report and engineering design documents for a groundwater infrastructure site. Reviewed deliverables, identified quality inconsistencies in the report, and raised concerns about errors and regulatory omissions in the design documents.
  • confidence assessment: 0.95
Review
Engineer Role
C7
Text References:
"Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report"
"Engineer A was tasked to develop engineering design documents (plans and specifications) for modifications to groundwater infrastructure at the same site"
Confidence: 0.92
Actor: Engineer A
Role Class: Environmental Engineer
Role Category: provider_client
Case Involvement: Licensed environmental engineer retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive contaminant report and engineering design documents for groundwater infrastructure modifications at a monitored site.
License: Professional Engineer
Specialty: Environmental engineering, groundwater monitoring
Experience: Several years
Has client: Client W
"Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W"
Peer: Engineer B
"Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts"
[facts] "Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer A
  • attributes: {'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'specialty': 'Environmental engineering, groundwater monitoring', 'experience': 'Several years'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'has_client', 'target': 'Client W', 'quote': 'Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W'}; {'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer B', 'quote': 'Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report; Engineer A was tasked to develop engineering design documents (plans and specifications) for modifications to groundwater infrastructure at the same site
  • roleClass content: Environmental Engineer
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • caseInvolvement content: Licensed environmental engineer retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive contaminant report and engineering design documents for groundwater infrastructure modifications at a monitored site.
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
Engineer A AI-Assisted Design
AI-AssistedDesignEngineer
New C7
Text References:
"Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design docum..."
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review, including language to clearly identify that the supplied report wa..."
"Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
Confidence: 0.88
Actor: Engineer A
Role Class: AI-Assisted Design Engineer
Role Category: provider_client
Case Involvement: Used open-source AI software to generate an initial report draft and preliminary engineering design documents without prior experience with the tool, applied a professional seal to the output, and did not disclose AI use to the client. The AI-generated design documents contained misaligned dimensions and omitted key safety features required by local regulations.
License: Professional Engineer
Ai tool experience: None prior to this engagement
Disclosure: No AI use disclosed
Has client: Client W
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review"
[facts] "Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design docum..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer A
  • attributes: {'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'ai_tool_experience': 'None prior to this engagement', 'disclosure': 'No AI use disclosed'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'has_client', 'target': 'Client W', 'quote': 'Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design documents; Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review, including language to clearly identify that the supplied report was a draft, but applied their seal consistent with state law; Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations
  • roleClass content: AI-Assisted Design Engineer
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • caseInvolvement content: Used open-source AI software to generate an initial report draft and preliminary engineering design documents without prior experience with the tool, applied a professional seal to the output, and did not disclose AI use to the client. The AI-generated design documents contained misaligned dimensions and omitted key safety features required by local regulations.
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
Engineer B Mentor Engineer
Professional Peer Role
Review
Professional Peer Role
C7
Text References:
"Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts"
"Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity"
Confidence: 0.9
Actor: Engineer B
Role Class: Mentor Engineer
Role Category: professional_peer
Case Involvement: Served as mentor and supervisor to Engineer A, providing guidance and quality assurance reviews of report drafts. Recently retired and became unavailable, removing the professional check that Engineer A had depended upon.
Status: Retired
Relationship to engineer a: Mentor and supervisor
Peer: Engineer A
"Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts"
[facts] "Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer B
  • attributes: {'status': 'Retired', 'relationship_to_engineer_a': 'Mentor and supervisor'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer A', 'quote': 'Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts; Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity
  • roleClass content: Mentor Engineer
  • roleCategory content: professional_peer
  • caseInvolvement content: Served as mentor and supervisor to Engineer A, providing guidance and quality assurance reviews of report drafts. Recently retired and became unavailable, removing the professional check that Engineer A had depended upon.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9

S States

States Classes
5
changed
Mentor Unavailable State
rdfs:subClassOf States
New C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
State in which a professional has lost access to a previously relied-upon mentor or supervisor whose guidance was integral to quality assurance and competence support, creating a gap in the professional's support structure and potentially affecting the quality and reliability of their work product.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity"
"Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts"
Confidence: 0.85
State Category: competence
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions:
  • Mentor or supervisor retires, resigns, or otherwise becomes unavailable
  • Professional had previously depended on that mentor for review or guidance
Termination Conditions:
  • A replacement mentor or supervisor is identified
  • Professional develops independent competence in the affected area
  • Alternative quality assurance arrangement is established
Obligation Activation:
  • Obligation to identify alternative quality assurance mechanisms
  • Obligation to disclose competence limitations to clients if work quality may be affected
  • Obligation to seek additional support before undertaking work that previously required mentorship
Action Constraints:
  • Should not proceed with work requiring mentorship support without establishing an alternative
  • Should not represent work quality as equivalent to prior mentored work without adequate substitute review
Principle Transformation: Transforms general competence obligations into specific duties to secure alternative quality assurance before undertaking work previously dependent on mentorship.
[facts] "Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity; Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts
  • stateCategory content: competence
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: Transforms general competence obligations into specific duties to secure alternative quality assurance before undertaking work previously dependent on mentorship.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Mentor or supervisor retires, resigns, or otherwise becomes unavailable; Professional had previously depended on that mentor for review or guidance
  • terminationConditions: A replacement mentor or supervisor is identified; Professional develops independent competence in the affected area; Alternative quality assurance arrangement is established
  • obligationActivation: Obligation to identify alternative quality assurance mechanisms; Obligation to disclose competence limitations to clients if work quality may be affected; Obligation to seek additional support before undertaking work that previously required mentorship
  • actionConstraints: Should not proceed with work requiring mentorship support without establishing an alternative; Should not represent work quality as equivalent to prior mentored work without adequate substitute review
changed
Unfamiliar Tool Deployment State
rdfs:subClassOf States
New C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
State in which a professional uses a tool, technology, or method with which they have no prior experience, creating elevated risk of undetected errors and triggering heightened obligations of verification, disclosure, and caution before relying on outputs for professional work products.
Properties
Text References:
"The AI drafting software was new to the market and Engineer A had no previous experience with the tool"
"Not being familiar with the full functionality of the AI software, including the accuracy and originality of AI-generated text"
Confidence: 0.87
State Category: competence
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions:
  • Professional adopts a tool or technology for the first time without prior training or experience
  • Tool is new to the market or otherwise untested in the professional's practice context
Termination Conditions:
  • Professional gains sufficient experience and familiarity with the tool
  • Professional completes formal training on the tool
  • Use of the tool is discontinued
Obligation Activation:
  • Obligation to conduct thorough verification of tool outputs before relying on them
  • Obligation to disclose use of unfamiliar tools to clients or supervisors where output reliability is uncertain
  • Obligation to seek guidance or training before deploying the tool on consequential work
Action Constraints:
  • Should not rely on tool outputs without independent verification when tool behavior is not fully understood
  • Should not represent outputs as professionally validated without adequate review
Principle Transformation: Transforms general competence and due care principles into specific verification and disclosure duties when deploying tools whose accuracy and limitations are not yet understood by the professional.
[facts] "The AI drafting software was new to the market and Engineer A had no previous experience with the tool"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The AI drafting software was new to the market and Engineer A had no previous experience with the tool; Not being familiar with the full functionality of the AI software, including the accuracy and originality of AI-generated text
  • stateCategory content: competence
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: Transforms general competence and due care principles into specific verification and disclosure duties when deploying tools whose accuracy and limitations are not yet understood by the professional.
  • confidence assessment: 0.87
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Professional adopts a tool or technology for the first time without prior training or experience; Tool is new to the market or otherwise untested in the professional's practice context
  • terminationConditions: Professional gains sufficient experience and familiarity with the tool; Professional completes formal training on the tool; Use of the tool is discontinued
  • obligationActivation: Obligation to conduct thorough verification of tool outputs before relying on them; Obligation to disclose use of unfamiliar tools to clients or supervisors where output reliability is uncertain; Obligation to seek guidance or training before deploying the tool on consequential work
  • actionConstraints: Should not rely on tool outputs without independent verification when tool behavior is not fully understood; Should not represent outputs as professionally validated without adequate review
changed
AI-Generated Work Product State
rdfs:subClassOf States
New C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
State in which a professional's work product has been substantially generated or drafted by artificial intelligence tools, creating obligations regarding disclosure of AI use, verification of accuracy and originality, professional accountability for the output, and compliance with applicable professional and legal standards governing AI-assisted work.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design docum..."
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review"
"Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents"
Confidence: 0.9
State Category: information
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions:
  • AI software is used to generate a draft report, design document, or other professional work product
  • AI output is incorporated into a deliverable submitted to a client or stamped with a professional seal
Termination Conditions:
  • AI-generated content is fully replaced by independently authored content
  • Disclosure of AI use is made and work product is re-evaluated under applicable standards
Obligation Activation:
  • Obligation to disclose AI tool use to clients and relevant parties
  • Obligation to verify accuracy, originality, and completeness of AI-generated content
  • Obligation to ensure AI-generated work meets professional and regulatory standards before sealing or submitting
  • Obligation to take professional responsibility for all content regardless of its generative origin
Action Constraints:
  • Should not seal or submit AI-generated work without thorough independent review
  • Should not omit disclosure of AI use where professional standards or client expectations require transparency
  • Should not rely on AI outputs for safety-critical design elements without independent verification
Principle Transformation: Transforms general honesty, competence, and professional accountability principles into specific duties of disclosure, verification, and independent review when AI tools contribute substantially to a professional work product.
[facts] "Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design docum..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design documents; Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review; Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents
  • stateCategory content: information
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: Transforms general honesty, competence, and professional accountability principles into specific duties of disclosure, verification, and independent review when AI tools contribute substantially to a professional work product.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: AI software is used to generate a draft report, design document, or other professional work product; AI output is incorporated into a deliverable submitted to a client or stamped with a professional seal
  • terminationConditions: AI-generated content is fully replaced by independently authored content; Disclosure of AI use is made and work product is re-evaluated under applicable standards
  • obligationActivation: Obligation to disclose AI tool use to clients and relevant parties; Obligation to verify accuracy, originality, and completeness of AI-generated content; Obligation to ensure AI-generated work meets professional and regulatory standards before sealing or submitting; Obligation to take professional responsibility for all content regardless of its generative origin
  • actionConstraints: Should not seal or submit AI-generated work without thorough independent review; Should not omit disclosure of AI use where professional standards or client expectations require transparency; Should not rely on AI outputs for safety-critical design elements without independent verification
changed
New C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
State in which a professional has submitted a work product to a client that contains errors, omissions, or deficiencies that fail to meet professional or regulatory standards, creating obligations to correct the deficiencies, notify affected parties, and assess whether safety or compliance risks have been introduced.
Properties
Text References:
"Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
"Client W raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the engineering design and instructed Engineer A to revise the plans"
Confidence: 0.88
State Category: risk
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions:
  • Client or reviewer identifies errors, omissions, or regulatory non-compliance in a submitted work product
  • Work product is found to be inaccurate or incomplete after submission
Termination Conditions:
  • Deficiencies are corrected and a revised work product meeting applicable standards is submitted
  • Client accepts a corrected version and any safety or compliance risks are resolved
Obligation Activation:
  • Obligation to revise and correct the deficient work product promptly
  • Obligation to assess whether deficiencies create safety or regulatory compliance risks
  • Obligation to notify affected parties if deficiencies pose safety risks
  • Obligation to investigate the root cause of deficiencies to prevent recurrence
Action Constraints:
  • Should not allow deficient work product to remain in use without correction
  • Should not minimize or conceal the nature or extent of identified deficiencies
Principle Transformation: Transforms general professional responsibility and public safety principles into specific corrective action and notification duties once deficiencies in a submitted work product are confirmed.
[facts] "Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations; Client W raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the engineering design and instructed Engineer A to revise the plans
  • stateCategory content: risk
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: Transforms general professional responsibility and public safety principles into specific corrective action and notification duties once deficiencies in a submitted work product are confirmed.
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Client or reviewer identifies errors, omissions, or regulatory non-compliance in a submitted work product; Work product is found to be inaccurate or incomplete after submission
  • terminationConditions: Deficiencies are corrected and a revised work product meeting applicable standards is submitted; Client accepts a corrected version and any safety or compliance risks are resolved
  • obligationActivation: Obligation to revise and correct the deficient work product promptly; Obligation to assess whether deficiencies create safety or regulatory compliance risks; Obligation to notify affected parties if deficiencies pose safety risks; Obligation to investigate the root cause of deficiencies to prevent recurrence
  • actionConstraints: Should not allow deficient work product to remain in use without correction; Should not minimize or conceal the nature or extent of identified deficiencies
changed
Undisclosed AI Use State
rdfs:subClassOf States
New C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
State in which a professional has used AI tools to generate or substantially assist in producing a work product but has not disclosed that use to the client, employer, or relevant professional body, creating a transparency deficit that may implicate honesty obligations, professional standards, and client trust.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review"
"Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents"
Confidence: 0.88
State Category: information
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions:
  • AI tools are used to generate or substantially draft a professional work product
  • The professional omits disclosure of AI use when submitting the work product
Termination Conditions:
  • Disclosure of AI use is made to the client or relevant parties
  • Work product is resubmitted with appropriate attribution and disclosure
Obligation Activation:
  • Obligation to disclose AI use to clients and relevant parties
  • Obligation to correct any false impression created by non-disclosure
  • Obligation to comply with professional standards governing attribution and transparency
Action Constraints:
  • Should not represent AI-generated content as entirely self-authored without disclosure
  • Should not seal or certify work without disclosing the role of AI in its production where standards require
Principle Transformation: Transforms honesty and transparency principles into specific disclosure obligations when AI tools have played a material role in producing a professional work product.
[facts] "Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review; Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents
  • stateCategory content: information
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: Transforms honesty and transparency principles into specific disclosure obligations when AI tools have played a material role in producing a professional work product.
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: AI tools are used to generate or substantially draft a professional work product; The professional omits disclosure of AI use when submitting the work product
  • terminationConditions: Disclosure of AI use is made to the client or relevant parties; Work product is resubmitted with appropriate attribution and disclosure
  • obligationActivation: Obligation to disclose AI use to clients and relevant parties; Obligation to correct any false impression created by non-disclosure; Obligation to comply with professional standards governing attribution and transparency
  • actionConstraints: Should not represent AI-generated content as entirely self-authored without disclosure; Should not seal or certify work without disclosing the role of AI in its production where standards require
States Individuals
12
Engineer A AI Report Draft
AI-GeneratedWorkProductState
New C7
Text References:
"Engineer A relied on the AI software to synthesize the information and generate an initial draft of the necessary report"
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review"
"applied their seal consistent with state law"
Confidence: 0.93
State Class: AI-Generated Work Product State
Subject: The draft report generated using AI software and submitted to Client W
Active Period: From AI generation of the report draft through submission to Client W
Triggering Event: Engineer A using AI software to generate the initial draft report and submitting it to Client W with a professional seal
Terminated By: Client W's review and identification of inconsistencies; pending revision
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A relied on the AI software to synthesize the information and generate an initial draft of the necessary report"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A relied on the AI software to synthesize the information and generate an initial draft of the necessary report; Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review; applied their seal consistent with state law
  • stateClass content: AI-Generated Work Product State
  • subject content: The draft report generated using AI software and submitted to Client W
  • activePeriod content: From AI generation of the report draft through submission to Client W
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A using AI software to generate the initial draft report and submitting it to Client W with a professional seal
  • terminatedBy content: Client W's review and identification of inconsistencies; pending revision
  • confidence assessment: 0.93
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
Engineer A Client Relationship
Client Relationship Established
Linked
Client Relationship Established
C7
Text References:
"Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report"
Confidence: 0.97
State Class: Client Relationship Established
Subject: Engineer A's professional engagement with Client W
Active Period: From retention by Client W through completion of report and design documents
Triggering Event: Client W retaining Engineer A to prepare the comprehensive report and engineering design documents
Terminated By: Completion and acceptance of all deliverables
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A, an environmental engineer with several years of experience and holding a professional engineering license, was retained by Client W to prepare a comprehensive report
  • stateClass content: Client Relationship Established
  • subject content: Engineer A's professional engagement with Client W
  • activePeriod content: From retention by Client W through completion of report and design documents
  • triggeringEvent content: Client W retaining Engineer A to prepare the comprehensive report and engineering design documents
  • terminatedBy content: Completion and acceptance of all deliverables
  • confidence assessment: 0.97
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
Linked
Competence State
C7
Text References:
"Engineer A is known for their strong technical expertise but is, personally, less confident in their technical writing"
"Previously, Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts"
Confidence: 0.92
State Class: Competence State
Subject: Engineer A's self-assessed limitation in technical writing
Active Period: Throughout the engagement, from initial assignment through submission of deliverables
Triggering Event: Engineer A's recognition of personal weakness in technical writing and loss of mentorship support
Terminated By: Not resolved within the case; persists through the described events
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A is known for their strong technical expertise but is, personally, less confident in their technical writing"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A is known for their strong technical expertise but is, personally, less confident in their technical writing; Previously, Engineer A had relied on guidance and quality assurance reviews by their mentor and supervisor, Engineer B, to refine report drafts
  • stateClass content: Competence State
  • subject content: Engineer A's self-assessed limitation in technical writing
  • activePeriod content: Throughout the engagement, from initial assignment through submission of deliverables
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A's recognition of personal weakness in technical writing and loss of mentorship support
  • terminatedBy content: Not resolved within the case; persists through the described events
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
Engineer A Mentor Unavailable
MentorUnavailableState
New C7
Text References:
"Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity"
"Faced with the need to deliver both the report and the engineering design documents without the review by and mentorship from Engineer B"
Confidence: 0.95
State Class: Mentor Unavailable State
Subject: Engineer A's loss of access to Engineer B as mentor and quality assurance reviewer
Active Period: From Engineer B's retirement through the completion of the engagement
Triggering Event: Engineer B's retirement from active work capacity
Terminated By: Not resolved within the case
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer B recently retired and was no longer available to Engineer A in a work capacity; Faced with the need to deliver both the report and the engineering design documents without the review by and mentorship from Engineer B
  • stateClass content: Mentor Unavailable State
  • subject content: Engineer A's loss of access to Engineer B as mentor and quality assurance reviewer
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer B's retirement through the completion of the engagement
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer B's retirement from active work capacity
  • terminatedBy content: Not resolved within the case
  • confidence assessment: 0.95
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
Engineer A Unfamiliar AI Tool
UnfamiliarToolDeploymentState
New C7
Text References:
"The AI drafting software was new to the market and Engineer A had no previous experience with the tool"
"Not being familiar with the full functionality of the AI software, including the accuracy and originality of AI-generated text"
Confidence: 0.94
State Class: Unfamiliar Tool Deployment State
Subject: Engineer A's use of AI drafting software with no prior experience
Active Period: From the decision to use AI software through submission of both deliverables
Triggering Event: Engineer A's decision to use new open-source AI drafting software without prior experience
Terminated By: Not resolved within the case
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "The AI drafting software was new to the market and Engineer A had no previous experience with the tool"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The AI drafting software was new to the market and Engineer A had no previous experience with the tool; Not being familiar with the full functionality of the AI software, including the accuracy and originality of AI-generated text
  • stateClass content: Unfamiliar Tool Deployment State
  • subject content: Engineer A's use of AI drafting software with no prior experience
  • activePeriod content: From the decision to use AI software through submission of both deliverables
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A's decision to use new open-source AI drafting software without prior experience
  • terminatedBy content: Not resolved within the case
  • confidence assessment: 0.94
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
Engineer A AI Design Documents
AI-GeneratedWorkProductState
New C7
Text References:
"Engineer A entered the information gathered from Client W into the AI software and relied on the AI-assisted drafting tools to generate a preliminary design of the plans"
"Engineer A completed a cursory review of the AI-generated plans and adjusted certain elements to align with site-specific conditions"
Confidence: 0.93
State Class: AI-Generated Work Product State
Subject: The engineering design documents generated using AI-assisted drafting tools and submitted to Client W
Active Period: From AI generation of the design documents through Client W's identification of deficiencies
Triggering Event: Engineer A using AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design plans and specifications and submitting them to Client W
Terminated By: Client W's identification of deficiencies and instruction to revise
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "Engineer A entered the information gathered from Client W into the AI software and relied on the AI-assisted drafting tools to generate a preliminary design of the plans"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A entered the information gathered from Client W into the AI software and relied on the AI-assisted drafting tools to generate a preliminary design of the plans; Engineer A completed a cursory review of the AI-generated plans and adjusted certain elements to align with site-specific conditions
  • stateClass content: AI-Generated Work Product State
  • subject content: The engineering design documents generated using AI-assisted drafting tools and submitted to Client W
  • activePeriod content: From AI generation of the design documents through Client W's identification of deficiencies
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A using AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design plans and specifications and submitting them to Client W
  • terminatedBy content: Client W's identification of deficiencies and instruction to revise
  • confidence assessment: 0.93
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
Engineer A Undisclosed AI Report
UndisclosedAIUseState
New C7
Text References:
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review"
Confidence: 0.92
State Class: Undisclosed AI Use State
Subject: Engineer A's omission of disclosure of AI use in the report
Active Period: From submission of the report through the case's described events
Triggering Event: Engineer A submitting the AI-assisted report to Client W without disclosing AI use
Terminated By: Not resolved within the case
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models, and submitted the draft report to Client W for review
  • stateClass content: Undisclosed AI Use State
  • subject content: Engineer A's omission of disclosure of AI use in the report
  • activePeriod content: From submission of the report through the case's described events
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A submitting the AI-assisted report to Client W without disclosing AI use
  • terminatedBy content: Not resolved within the case
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
Engineer A Undisclosed AI Design
UndisclosedAIUseState
New C7
Text References:
"Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents"
Confidence: 0.92
State Class: Undisclosed AI Use State
Subject: Engineer A's omission of disclosure of AI use in the engineering design documents
Active Period: From submission of the design documents through the case's described events
Triggering Event: Engineer A submitting the AI-assisted design documents to Client W without disclosing AI use
Terminated By: Not resolved within the case
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents
  • stateClass content: Undisclosed AI Use State
  • subject content: Engineer A's omission of disclosure of AI use in the engineering design documents
  • activePeriod content: From submission of the design documents through the case's described events
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A submitting the AI-assisted design documents to Client W without disclosing AI use
  • terminatedBy content: Not resolved within the case
  • confidence assessment: 0.92
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
Engineer A Design Deficiencies
DeficientWorkProductSubmittedState
New C7
Text References:
"Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
"Client W raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the engineering design and instructed Engineer A to revise the plans, ensuring that all elements satisfied the necessary professional and..."
Confidence: 0.94
State Class: Deficient Work Product Submitted State
Subject: The engineering design documents found to contain errors and regulatory omissions
Active Period: From Client W's identification of deficiencies through correction and resubmission
Triggering Event: Client W identifying misaligned dimensions and omission of required safety features in the AI-generated design documents
Terminated By: Engineer A revising the plans to meet professional and regulatory standards
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations; Client W raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the engineering design and instructed Engineer A to revise the plans, ensuring that all elements satisfied the necessary professional and regulatory standards
  • stateClass content: Deficient Work Product Submitted State
  • subject content: The engineering design documents found to contain errors and regulatory omissions
  • activePeriod content: From Client W's identification of deficiencies through correction and resubmission
  • triggeringEvent content: Client W identifying misaligned dimensions and omission of required safety features in the AI-generated design documents
  • terminatedBy content: Engineer A revising the plans to meet professional and regulatory standards
  • confidence assessment: 0.94
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
Linked
Non-Compliant State
C7
Text References:
"an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
"instructed Engineer A to revise the plans, ensuring that all elements satisfied the necessary professional and regulatory standards"
Confidence: 0.93
State Class: Non-Compliant State
Subject: The engineering design documents that omit safety features required by local regulations
Active Period: From submission of the deficient design documents through correction and resubmission
Triggering Event: Client W identifying that the AI-generated design documents omit key safety features required by local regulations
Terminated By: Engineer A revising the plans to satisfy regulatory requirements
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: an omission of key safety features required by local regulations; instructed Engineer A to revise the plans, ensuring that all elements satisfied the necessary professional and regulatory standards
  • stateClass content: Non-Compliant State
  • subject content: The engineering design documents that omit safety features required by local regulations
  • activePeriod content: From submission of the deficient design documents through correction and resubmission
  • triggeringEvent content: Client W identifying that the AI-generated design documents omit key safety features required by local regulations
  • terminatedBy content: Engineer A revising the plans to satisfy regulatory requirements
  • confidence assessment: 0.93
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
Linked
Public Safety at Risk
C7
Text References:
"an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
"Client W raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the engineering design"
Confidence: 0.9
State Class: Public Safety at Risk
Subject: The risk to public safety created by the omission of required safety features in the engineering design documents
Active Period: From identification of the safety feature omissions through correction of the design documents
Triggering Event: Client W identifying that required safety features were omitted from the AI-generated design documents
Terminated By: Engineer A revising the plans to include all required safety features
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
  • public users of the groundwater infrastructure
Urgency Level: high
[facts] "an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W; public users of the groundwater infrastructure
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: an omission of key safety features required by local regulations; Client W raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the engineering design
  • stateClass content: Public Safety at Risk
  • subject content: The risk to public safety created by the omission of required safety features in the engineering design documents
  • activePeriod content: From identification of the safety feature omissions through correction of the design documents
  • triggeringEvent content: Client W identifying that required safety features were omitted from the AI-generated design documents
  • terminatedBy content: Engineer A revising the plans to include all required safety features
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
  • urgencyLevel assessment: high
Engineer A Confidential Client Data AI Input
Confidential Information Held
Linked
Confidential Information Held
C7
Text References:
"Engineer A gathered the relevant information provided by Client W and relied on the AI software to synthesize the information"
"Engineer A input the information gathered from Client W into the AI software"
"The AI drafting software was also open-sourced"
Confidence: 0.88
State Class: Confidential Information Held
Subject: Client W's proprietary site data and groundwater monitoring information input into open-source AI software
Active Period: From Engineer A inputting Client W's information into the AI software through the engagement
Triggering Event: Engineer A entering information gathered from Client W into open-source AI software
Terminated By: Not resolved within the case
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • Client W
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A gathered the relevant information provided by Client W and relied on the AI software to synthesize the information"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • affectedParties: Engineer A; Client W
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A gathered the relevant information provided by Client W and relied on the AI software to synthesize the information; Engineer A input the information gathered from Client W into the AI software; The AI drafting software was also open-sourced
  • stateClass content: Confidential Information Held
  • subject content: Client W's proprietary site data and groundwater monitoring information input into open-source AI software
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A inputting Client W's information into the AI software through the engagement
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A entering information gathered from Client W into open-source AI software
  • terminatedBy content: Not resolved within the case
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium

Rs Resources

Resources Classes
3
Engineering Seal Regulation Resource
rdfs:subClassOf Resources
Review
Legal Resource
C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
State law or regulatory provision governing the conditions under which a licensed professional engineer may apply their professional seal to engineering documents, including requirements for responsible charge, review, and accuracy of sealed work.
Inherited from LegalResource · note
Legal framework constraining professional practice
Properties
Text References:
"submitted the draft report to Client W for review, including language to clearly identify that the supplied report was a draft, but applied their seal consistent with state law."
Confidence: 0.82
Resource Category: legal_resource
Authority Source: State professional engineering licensing boards and state legislatures
Extensional Function: Establishes the legal threshold for professional accountability when an engineer seals a document, grounding the duty of responsible charge in enforceable state law.
Usage Context:
  • Sealing draft reports
  • Sealing engineering design documents
  • Determining conditions for responsible charge
[facts] "submitted the draft report to Client W for review, including language to clearly identify that the supplied report was a draft, but applied their seal consistent with state law."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: submitted the draft report to Client W for review, including language to clearly identify that the supplied report was a draft, but applied their seal consistent with state law.
  • resourceCategory content: legal_resource
  • authoritySource content: State professional engineering licensing boards and state legislatures
  • extensionalFunction content: Establishes the legal threshold for professional accountability when an engineer seals a document, grounding the duty of responsible charge in enforceable state law.
  • usageContext content: Sealing draft reports; Sealing engineering design documents; Determining conditions for responsible charge
  • confidence assessment: 0.82
Review
Legal Resource
C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
Local or jurisdictional regulations specifying mandatory safety features and design requirements that engineering documents must satisfy, serving as a binding technical and legal floor for professional engineering deliverables.
Inherited from LegalResource · note
Legal framework constraining professional practice
Properties
Text References:
"Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations."
"ensuring that all elements satisfied the necessary professional and regulatory standards."
Confidence: 0.8
Resource Category: legal_resource
Authority Source: Local regulatory authorities and jurisdictional bodies
Extensional Function: Provides the concrete regulatory baseline against which engineering design documents are evaluated for compliance, grounding the professional obligation to meet safety and regulatory standards.
Usage Context:
  • Review of engineering design documents for regulatory compliance
  • Identification of omitted safety features in AI-generated plans
[facts] "Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations.; ensuring that all elements satisfied the necessary professional and regulatory standards.
  • resourceCategory content: legal_resource
  • authoritySource content: Local regulatory authorities and jurisdictional bodies
  • extensionalFunction content: Provides the concrete regulatory baseline against which engineering design documents are evaluated for compliance, grounding the professional obligation to meet safety and regulatory standards.
  • usageContext content: Review of engineering design documents for regulatory compliance; Identification of omitted safety features in AI-generated plans
  • confidence assessment: 0.8
AI Tool Use Guidance Resource
rdfs:subClassOf Resources
New C7
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
Professional guidance, policy statements, or documented norms addressing the appropriate use of artificial intelligence tools in engineering practice, including disclosure obligations, accuracy verification requirements, and professional responsibility when AI-generated content is incorporated into deliverables.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design docum..."
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models"
"Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents."
Confidence: 0.78
Resource Category: expert_interpretation
Authority Source: Professional engineering societies, ethics boards, and regulatory bodies issuing guidance on emerging technology in practice
Extensional Function: Bridges abstract professional responsibility principles to the novel context of AI-assisted engineering work, providing concrete guidance on when and how AI tools may be used and what obligations attach to their use.
Usage Context:
  • AI-assisted report drafting
  • AI-assisted design document generation
  • Disclosure of AI tool use to clients
  • Verification of AI-generated content
[facts] "Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design docum..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report and to use AI-assisted drafting tools to generate preliminary design documents.; Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models; Engineer A did not cite the AI-assisted drafting tools they used to generate the engineering design documents.
  • resourceCategory content: expert_interpretation
  • authoritySource content: Professional engineering societies, ethics boards, and regulatory bodies issuing guidance on emerging technology in practice
  • extensionalFunction content: Bridges abstract professional responsibility principles to the novel context of AI-assisted engineering work, providing concrete guidance on when and how AI tools may be used and what obligations attach to their use.
  • usageContext content: AI-assisted report drafting; AI-assisted design document generation; Disclosure of AI tool use to clients; Verification of AI-generated content
  • confidence assessment: 0.78
Resources Individuals
3
NSPE Code of Ethics
Professional Code
Linked
Professional Code
C7
Text References:
"Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report"
"Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models"
"Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations."
Confidence: 0.95
Resource Class: Professional Code
Document Title: NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers
Created By: National Society of Professional Engineers
Version: Current
Used By: Engineer A
Used In Context: Governs Engineer A's professional obligations regarding competence, responsible use of AI tools, disclosure to clients, accuracy of sealed documents, and public safety in engineering deliverables.
[facts] "Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • usedBy: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A opted to use open-sourced artificial intelligence (AI) software to create an initial draft of the necessary report; Engineer A did not cite their use of AI-software or its large language models; Client W noticed several issues with the AI-generated design documents, including misaligned dimensions and an omission of key safety features required by local regulations.
  • resourceClass content: Professional Code
  • documentTitle content: NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers
  • createdBy content: National Society of Professional Engineers
  • version content: Current
  • usedInContext content: Governs Engineer A's professional obligations regarding competence, responsible use of AI tools, disclosure to clients, accuracy of sealed documents, and public safety in engineering deliverables.
  • confidence assessment: 0.95
Linked
Legal Resource
C7
Text References:
"applied their seal consistent with state law"
Confidence: 0.85
Resource Class: Legal Resource
Document Title: State Professional Engineering Licensing Statute governing seal application
Created By: State legislature or professional licensing board
Version: Applicable state law at time of case
Used By: Engineer A
Used In Context: Engineer A applied their professional seal to the draft report consistent with state law, making the conditions and requirements of that law directly relevant to the propriety of sealing AI-assisted work.
[facts] "applied their seal consistent with state law"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • usedBy: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: applied their seal consistent with state law
  • resourceClass content: Legal Resource
  • documentTitle content: State Professional Engineering Licensing Statute governing seal application
  • createdBy content: State legislature or professional licensing board
  • version content: Applicable state law at time of case
  • usedInContext content: Engineer A applied their professional seal to the draft report consistent with state law, making the conditions and requirements of that law directly relevant to the propriety of sealing AI-assisted work.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Linked
Legal Resource
C7
Text References:
"an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
"ensuring that all elements satisfied the necessary professional and regulatory standards"
Confidence: 0.83
Resource Class: Legal Resource
Document Title: Local regulatory requirements for groundwater infrastructure design safety features
Created By: Local regulatory authority
Version: Applicable local regulations at time of case
Used By: Engineer A
Used In Context: Client W identified that the AI-generated design documents omitted key safety features required by local regulations, establishing the regulatory standard against which Engineer A's design documents were found deficient.
[facts] "an omission of key safety features required by local regulations"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • usedBy: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: an omission of key safety features required by local regulations; ensuring that all elements satisfied the necessary professional and regulatory standards
  • resourceClass content: Legal Resource
  • documentTitle content: Local regulatory requirements for groundwater infrastructure design safety features
  • createdBy content: Local regulatory authority
  • version content: Applicable local regulations at time of case
  • usedInContext content: Client W identified that the AI-generated design documents omitted key safety features required by local regulations, establishing the regulatory standard against which Engineer A's design documents were found deficient.
  • confidence assessment: 0.83
Pass 1: Contextual Framework - Facts
Review extracted entities, then continue to the next step
Continue to Discussion Review

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue