Enhanced Temporal Review

Timeline Overview

Note: The timeline includes only actions and events with clear temporal markers that could be sequenced chronologically.

Timeline Elements: 7

Actions on Timeline: 4 (of 4 extracted)

Events on Timeline: 3 (of 3 extracted)

Temporal Markers

After receiving 60-day notice 1 elements
After completing studies 1 elements
After receiving verbal findings 1 elements
After terminating Doe's contract 1 elements
Initial 1 elements
During study period 1 elements
During public hearing 1 elements

Temporal Consistency Check

Valid

Extracted Actions (4)

Volitional professional decisions with intentions and ethical context

Description: XYZ Corporation hired Engineer Doe to conduct consulting studies after receiving 60-day permit deadline from pollution authority.

Temporal Marker: After receiving 60-day notice

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Obtain professional assessment for permit compliance

Fulfills Obligations:

Due diligence
Professional consultation

Guided By Principles:

Regulatory compliance
Professional expertise

Required Capabilities:

Environmental assessment Regulatory knowledge

Within Competence: Yes

Scenario Metadata

Pedagogical context for interactive teaching scenarios

Character Motivation: XYZ faced regulatory deadline pressure and needed expert environmental assessment to comply with pollution authority requirements

Ethical Tension: Business urgency vs thoroughness of environmental due diligence

Learning Significance: Organizations must balance compliance deadlines with selecting qualified professionals and allowing adequate time for proper assessment

Stakes: Environmental compliance, potential fines, public health, corporate reputation

Decision Point: Yes - Story can branch here

Alternative Actions:

Handle assessment internally with existing staff
Request deadline extension from pollution authority
Hire multiple consultants for faster turnaround

Narrative Role: inciting_incident

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "proeth-scenario": "http://proethica.org/ontology/scenario#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Action_Hiring_Engineering_Consultant",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth-scenario:alternativeActions": [
    "Handle assessment internally with existing staff",
    "Request deadline extension from pollution authority",
    "Hire multiple consultants for faster turnaround"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:characterMotivation": "XYZ faced regulatory deadline pressure and needed expert environmental assessment to comply with pollution authority requirements",
  "proeth-scenario:consequencesIfAlternative": [
    "Possible inadequate expertise leading to poor assessment",
    "Potential regulatory penalties for missing deadline",
    "Higher costs but potentially more comprehensive analysis"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:decisionSignificance": "Organizations must balance compliance deadlines with selecting qualified professionals and allowing adequate time for proper assessment",
  "proeth-scenario:ethicalTension": "Business urgency vs thoroughness of environmental due diligence",
  "proeth-scenario:isDecisionPoint": true,
  "proeth-scenario:narrativeRole": "inciting_incident",
  "proeth-scenario:stakes": "Environmental compliance, potential fines, public health, corporate reputation",
  "proeth:description": "XYZ Corporation hired Engineer Doe to conduct consulting studies after receiving 60-day permit deadline from pollution authority.",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Potential discovery of violations"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Due diligence",
    "Professional consultation"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Regulatory compliance",
    "Professional expertise"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "XYZ Corporation (Management)",
  "proeth:hasCompetingPriorities": {
    "@type": "proeth:CompetingPriorities",
    "proeth:priorityConflict": "Cost vs Compliance",
    "proeth:resolutionReasoning": "Compliance prioritized due to regulatory pressure"
  },
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Obtain professional assessment for permit compliance",
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Environmental assessment",
    "Regulatory knowledge"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After receiving 60-day notice",
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Hiring Engineering Consultant"
}

Description: Engineer Doe verbally reported discharge violations to XYZ Corporation after completing his studies.

Temporal Marker: After completing studies

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Inform client of professional findings

Fulfills Obligations:

Professional honesty
Faithful service to client

Guided By Principles:

Integrity
Competent practice

Required Capabilities:

Environmental engineering Data analysis

Within Competence: Yes

Scenario Metadata

Pedagogical context for interactive teaching scenarios

Character Motivation: Doe fulfilled professional duty to report findings to client while potentially hoping verbal communication might allow for discussion and remediation planning

Ethical Tension: Professional obligation to report truthful findings vs client relationship and business considerations

Learning Significance: Engineers must communicate adverse findings clearly regardless of client preferences, and documentation standards matter

Stakes: Professional integrity, environmental protection, legal liability, public trust

Decision Point: Yes - Story can branch here

Alternative Actions:

Provide only written formal report
Request meeting with XYZ management before reporting
Report directly to pollution authority

Narrative Role: rising_action

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "proeth-scenario": "http://proethica.org/ontology/scenario#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Action_Verbal_Findings_Report",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth-scenario:alternativeActions": [
    "Provide only written formal report",
    "Request meeting with XYZ management before reporting",
    "Report directly to pollution authority"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:characterMotivation": "Doe fulfilled professional duty to report findings to client while potentially hoping verbal communication might allow for discussion and remediation planning",
  "proeth-scenario:consequencesIfAlternative": [
    "Clear documentation but potential client shock",
    "Possible collaborative problem-solving approach",
    "Breach of client confidentiality and likely contract violation"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:decisionSignificance": "Engineers must communicate adverse findings clearly regardless of client preferences, and documentation standards matter",
  "proeth-scenario:ethicalTension": "Professional obligation to report truthful findings vs client relationship and business considerations",
  "proeth-scenario:isDecisionPoint": true,
  "proeth-scenario:narrativeRole": "rising_action",
  "proeth-scenario:stakes": "Professional integrity, environmental protection, legal liability, public trust",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer Doe verbally reported discharge violations to XYZ Corporation after completing his studies.",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Client displeasure",
    "Contract termination risk"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Professional honesty",
    "Faithful service to client"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Integrity",
    "Competent practice"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer Doe (Consulting Engineer)",
  "proeth:hasCompetingPriorities": {
    "@type": "proeth:CompetingPriorities",
    "proeth:priorityConflict": "Client satisfaction vs Professional integrity",
    "proeth:resolutionReasoning": "Professional integrity prioritized"
  },
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Inform client of professional findings",
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Environmental engineering",
    "Data analysis"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After completing studies",
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Verbal Findings Report"
}

Description: XYZ Corporation terminated Engineer Doe's contract and instructed him not to provide a written report after receiving his verbal findings.

Temporal Marker: After receiving verbal findings

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Prevent formal documentation of violations

Fulfills Obligations:

Business interests protection

Guided By Principles:

Business continuity

Required Capabilities:

Contract management Risk assessment

Within Competence: Yes

Scenario Metadata

Pedagogical context for interactive teaching scenarios

Character Motivation: XYZ sought to avoid documented evidence of violations that could be used in regulatory proceedings or legal action

Ethical Tension: Corporate legal strategy vs transparency and accountability

Learning Significance: Attempting to suppress unfavorable professional findings raises serious ethical and legal concerns about obstruction and cover-up

Stakes: Environmental justice, regulatory integrity, professional independence, potential criminal liability

Decision Point: Yes - Story can branch here

Alternative Actions:

Accept written report and develop remediation plan
Request second opinion from another consultant
Negotiate with Doe about report contents and recommendations

Narrative Role: climax

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "proeth-scenario": "http://proethica.org/ontology/scenario#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Action_Contract_Termination_Decision",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth-scenario:alternativeActions": [
    "Accept written report and develop remediation plan",
    "Request second opinion from another consultant",
    "Negotiate with Doe about report contents and recommendations"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:characterMotivation": "XYZ sought to avoid documented evidence of violations that could be used in regulatory proceedings or legal action",
  "proeth-scenario:consequencesIfAlternative": [
    "Proper documentation enables regulatory compliance planning",
    "Additional cost but verification of findings",
    "Potential compromise of professional integrity but maintained business relationship"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:decisionSignificance": "Attempting to suppress unfavorable professional findings raises serious ethical and legal concerns about obstruction and cover-up",
  "proeth-scenario:ethicalTension": "Corporate legal strategy vs transparency and accountability",
  "proeth-scenario:isDecisionPoint": true,
  "proeth-scenario:narrativeRole": "climax",
  "proeth-scenario:stakes": "Environmental justice, regulatory integrity, professional independence, potential criminal liability",
  "proeth:description": "XYZ Corporation terminated Engineer Doe\u0027s contract and instructed him not to provide a written report after receiving his verbal findings.",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Potential regulatory scrutiny",
    "Engineer\u0027s ethical concerns"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Business interests protection"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Business continuity"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "XYZ Corporation (Management)",
  "proeth:hasCompetingPriorities": {
    "@type": "proeth:CompetingPriorities",
    "proeth:priorityConflict": "Business interests vs Environmental compliance",
    "proeth:resolutionReasoning": "Business interests prioritized over environmental obligations"
  },
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Prevent formal documentation of violations",
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Contract management",
    "Risk assessment"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After receiving verbal findings",
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Environmental stewardship",
    "Public transparency"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Contract Termination Decision"
}

Description: XYZ Corporation presented data contradicting Engineer Doe's findings at the public hearing after terminating his contract.

Temporal Marker: After terminating Doe's contract

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Avoid regulatory penalties and corrective action requirements

Guided By Principles:

Business survival

Required Capabilities:

Technical credibility Environmental expertise

Within Competence: No

Scenario Metadata

Pedagogical context for interactive teaching scenarios

Character Motivation: XYZ attempted to present favorable data to pollution authority and public to avoid penalties and maintain corporate image

Ethical Tension: Corporate self-interest vs truthfulness in public proceedings

Learning Significance: Misrepresenting environmental data in public hearings constitutes fraud and demonstrates why independent professional oversight is crucial

Stakes: Environmental protection, public health, regulatory process integrity, criminal fraud liability

Narrative Role: falling_action

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "proeth-scenario": "http://proethica.org/ontology/scenario#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Action_Contradictory_Data_Presentation",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth-scenario:alternativeActions": [
    "Present Doe\u0027s findings honestly with remediation plan",
    "Decline to present technical data at hearing",
    "Acknowledge uncertainty and request additional study time"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:characterMotivation": "XYZ attempted to present favorable data to pollution authority and public to avoid penalties and maintain corporate image",
  "proeth-scenario:consequencesIfAlternative": [
    "Regulatory penalties but maintained credibility and legal compliance",
    "Missed opportunity to influence regulatory decision",
    "Potential deadline extension but delayed resolution"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:decisionSignificance": "Misrepresenting environmental data in public hearings constitutes fraud and demonstrates why independent professional oversight is crucial",
  "proeth-scenario:ethicalTension": "Corporate self-interest vs truthfulness in public proceedings",
  "proeth-scenario:isDecisionPoint": false,
  "proeth-scenario:narrativeRole": "falling_action",
  "proeth-scenario:stakes": "Environmental protection, public health, regulatory process integrity, criminal fraud liability",
  "proeth:description": "XYZ Corporation presented data contradicting Engineer Doe\u0027s findings at the public hearing after terminating his contract.",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Public deception",
    "Engineer\u0027s professional obligations triggered"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Business survival"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "XYZ Corporation (Management)",
  "proeth:hasCompetingPriorities": {
    "@type": "proeth:CompetingPriorities",
    "proeth:priorityConflict": "Business survival vs Public welfare",
    "proeth:resolutionReasoning": "Corporate interests prioritized over public welfare"
  },
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Avoid regulatory penalties and corrective action requirements",
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Technical credibility",
    "Environmental expertise"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After terminating Doe\u0027s contract",
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Public transparency",
    "Environmental stewardship",
    "Honest dealing"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Contradictory Data Presentation"
}

Extracted Events (3)

Occurrences that trigger ethical considerations and state changes

Description: Pollution authority establishes 60-day deadline for XYZ Corporation to obtain environmental permit compliance.

Temporal Marker: Initial

Activates Constraints:

Regulatory_Compliance_Constraint
Time_Pressure_Constraint

Scenario Metadata

Pedagogical context for interactive teaching scenarios

Emotional Impact: Anxiety and pressure for XYZ management; professional concern for Engineer Doe; potential worry for affected communities

Stakeholder Consequences:

xyz_management: Faces regulatory pressure, potential penalties, business continuity risk
engineer_doe: Opportunity for professional engagement, responsibility for accurate assessment
public: Potential environmental protection, regulatory oversight of pollution
pollution_authority: Exercise of regulatory power, expectation of compliance

Learning Moment: Establishes the regulatory context that creates pressure for ethical corners-cutting; shows how external deadlines can create ethical tensions

Ethical Implications: Creates tension between time pressure and thorough professional work; establishes regulatory compliance as competing obligation with corporate interests

Discussion Prompts:

How do regulatory deadlines affect the quality of environmental assessments?
What responsibilities do engineers have when working under tight compliance deadlines?
How should regulatory pressure influence engineering ethics decisions?

Tension: medium Pacing: escalation

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "proeth-scenario": "http://proethica.org/ontology/scenario#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Event_Permit_Deadline_Imposed",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth-scenario:crisisIdentification": false,
  "proeth-scenario:discussionPrompts": [
    "How do regulatory deadlines affect the quality of environmental assessments?",
    "What responsibilities do engineers have when working under tight compliance deadlines?",
    "How should regulatory pressure influence engineering ethics decisions?"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:dramaticTension": "medium",
  "proeth-scenario:emotionalImpact": "Anxiety and pressure for XYZ management; professional concern for Engineer Doe; potential worry for affected communities",
  "proeth-scenario:ethicalImplications": "Creates tension between time pressure and thorough professional work; establishes regulatory compliance as competing obligation with corporate interests",
  "proeth-scenario:learningMoment": "Establishes the regulatory context that creates pressure for ethical corners-cutting; shows how external deadlines can create ethical tensions",
  "proeth-scenario:narrativePacing": "escalation",
  "proeth-scenario:stakeholderConsequences": {
    "engineer_doe": "Opportunity for professional engagement, responsibility for accurate assessment",
    "pollution_authority": "Exercise of regulatory power, expectation of compliance",
    "public": "Potential environmental protection, regulatory oversight of pollution",
    "xyz_management": "Faces regulatory pressure, potential penalties, business continuity risk"
  },
  "proeth:activatesConstraint": [
    "Regulatory_Compliance_Constraint",
    "Time_Pressure_Constraint"
  ],
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Corporation under regulatory pressure with defined compliance timeline",
  "proeth:createsObligation": [
    "Achieve_Permit_Compliance",
    "Conduct_Environmental_Assessment"
  ],
  "proeth:description": "Pollution authority establishes 60-day deadline for XYZ Corporation to obtain environmental permit compliance.",
  "proeth:emergencyStatus": "high",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Initial",
  "proeth:urgencyLevel": "high",
  "rdfs:label": "Permit Deadline Imposed"
}

Description: Engineer Doe's technical studies reveal environmental discharge violations by XYZ Corporation during compliance assessment.

Temporal Marker: During study period

Activates Constraints:

Public_Safety_Constraint
Professional_Honesty_Constraint
Environmental_Protection_Constraint

Scenario Metadata

Pedagogical context for interactive teaching scenarios

Emotional Impact: Professional concern and duty conflict for Engineer Doe; alarm and defensive reaction from XYZ management; potential relief for affected communities if violations are addressed

Stakeholder Consequences:

engineer_doe: Faces ethical obligation to report violations vs. client relationship pressure
xyz_management: Confronted with evidence of violations, potential regulatory and financial consequences
public: Environmental harm documented, opportunity for protection through proper reporting
pollution_authority: Needs accurate information to enforce environmental protection

Learning Moment: Demonstrates how professional competence can create ethical dilemmas when findings conflict with client interests; shows the moment when engineering integrity is tested

Ethical Implications: Creates direct conflict between loyalty to client and professional duty to public; reveals tension between business interests and environmental protection; tests engineering integrity under pressure

Discussion Prompts:

What are an engineer's obligations when discovering client violations during consulting work?
How should engineers balance client confidentiality with public safety concerns?
What factors should influence how violations are reported and to whom?

Crisis / Turning Point Tension: high Pacing: crisis

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "proeth-scenario": "http://proethica.org/ontology/scenario#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Event_Discharge_Violations_Discovered",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth-scenario:crisisIdentification": true,
  "proeth-scenario:discussionPrompts": [
    "What are an engineer\u0027s obligations when discovering client violations during consulting work?",
    "How should engineers balance client confidentiality with public safety concerns?",
    "What factors should influence how violations are reported and to whom?"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:dramaticTension": "high",
  "proeth-scenario:emotionalImpact": "Professional concern and duty conflict for Engineer Doe; alarm and defensive reaction from XYZ management; potential relief for affected communities if violations are addressed",
  "proeth-scenario:ethicalImplications": "Creates direct conflict between loyalty to client and professional duty to public; reveals tension between business interests and environmental protection; tests engineering integrity under pressure",
  "proeth-scenario:learningMoment": "Demonstrates how professional competence can create ethical dilemmas when findings conflict with client interests; shows the moment when engineering integrity is tested",
  "proeth-scenario:narrativePacing": "crisis",
  "proeth-scenario:stakeholderConsequences": {
    "engineer_doe": "Faces ethical obligation to report violations vs. client relationship pressure",
    "pollution_authority": "Needs accurate information to enforce environmental protection",
    "public": "Environmental harm documented, opportunity for protection through proper reporting",
    "xyz_management": "Confronted with evidence of violations, potential regulatory and financial consequences"
  },
  "proeth:activatesConstraint": [
    "Public_Safety_Constraint",
    "Professional_Honesty_Constraint",
    "Environmental_Protection_Constraint"
  ],
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Action_Hiring_Engineering_Consultant",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Critical environmental violations identified, requiring professional reporting and remediation",
  "proeth:createsObligation": [
    "Report_Findings_Accurately",
    "Ensure_Public_Safety",
    "Document_Violations"
  ],
  "proeth:description": "Engineer Doe\u0027s technical studies reveal environmental discharge violations by XYZ Corporation during compliance assessment.",
  "proeth:emergencyStatus": "high",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "During study period",
  "proeth:urgencyLevel": "high",
  "rdfs:label": "Discharge Violations Discovered"
}

Description: Engineer Doe's professional ethical obligations are automatically activated when XYZ presents contradictory data at public hearing, creating duty to respond to misrepresentation.

Temporal Marker: During public hearing

Activates Constraints:

Public_Safety_Paramount_Constraint
Professional_Integrity_Constraint
Truth_in_Public_Forum_Constraint

Scenario Metadata

Pedagogical context for interactive teaching scenarios

Emotional Impact: Moral crisis and professional duty conflict for Engineer Doe; anger and betrayal feelings toward XYZ; concern for public welfare; anxiety about career consequences

Stakeholder Consequences:

engineer_doe: Must choose between professional ethics and career safety; faces potential retaliation but ethical mandate to act
xyz_management: Public deception exposed, regulatory consequences, loss of credibility
public: Protected from environmental deception, given accurate information for health decisions
pollution_authority: Receives accurate data for regulatory decision-making
engineering_profession: Professional integrity tested; precedent set for ethical behavior under pressure

Learning Moment: Demonstrates paramount duty to public safety; shows how professional ethics codes create mandatory responses in specific situations; illustrates consequences of client attempts to suppress unfavorable findings

Ethical Implications: Tests fundamental principle that engineers' paramount duty is to public safety; demonstrates conflict between individual career interests and professional integrity; reveals how suppression of technical findings can create cascading ethical violations

Discussion Prompts:

When do engineers' duties to the public override client confidentiality?
How should engineers respond when former clients misrepresent their work in public forums?
What protections should exist for engineers who face retaliation for ethical behavior?

Crisis / Turning Point Tension: high Pacing: crisis

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "proeth-scenario": "http://proethica.org/ontology/scenario#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Event_Ethical_Obligations_Triggered",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth-scenario:crisisIdentification": true,
  "proeth-scenario:discussionPrompts": [
    "When do engineers\u0027 duties to the public override client confidentiality?",
    "How should engineers respond when former clients misrepresent their work in public forums?",
    "What protections should exist for engineers who face retaliation for ethical behavior?"
  ],
  "proeth-scenario:dramaticTension": "high",
  "proeth-scenario:emotionalImpact": "Moral crisis and professional duty conflict for Engineer Doe; anger and betrayal feelings toward XYZ; concern for public welfare; anxiety about career consequences",
  "proeth-scenario:ethicalImplications": "Tests fundamental principle that engineers\u0027 paramount duty is to public safety; demonstrates conflict between individual career interests and professional integrity; reveals how suppression of technical findings can create cascading ethical violations",
  "proeth-scenario:learningMoment": "Demonstrates paramount duty to public safety; shows how professional ethics codes create mandatory responses in specific situations; illustrates consequences of client attempts to suppress unfavorable findings",
  "proeth-scenario:narrativePacing": "crisis",
  "proeth-scenario:stakeholderConsequences": {
    "engineer_doe": "Must choose between professional ethics and career safety; faces potential retaliation but ethical mandate to act",
    "engineering_profession": "Professional integrity tested; precedent set for ethical behavior under pressure",
    "pollution_authority": "Receives accurate data for regulatory decision-making",
    "public": "Protected from environmental deception, given accurate information for health decisions",
    "xyz_management": "Public deception exposed, regulatory consequences, loss of credibility"
  },
  "proeth:activatesConstraint": [
    "Public_Safety_Paramount_Constraint",
    "Professional_Integrity_Constraint",
    "Truth_in_Public_Forum_Constraint"
  ],
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#Action_Contradictory_Data_Presentation",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Engineer\u0027s paramount duty to public safety overrides client relationship; immediate action required to prevent public deception",
  "proeth:createsObligation": [
    "Correct_Public_Misrepresentation",
    "Protect_Public_Welfare",
    "Maintain_Professional_Integrity"
  ],
  "proeth:description": "Engineer Doe\u0027s professional ethical obligations are automatically activated when XYZ presents contradictory data at public hearing, creating duty to respond to misrepresentation.",
  "proeth:emergencyStatus": "critical",
  "proeth:eventType": "automatic_trigger",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "During public hearing",
  "proeth:urgencyLevel": "critical",
  "rdfs:label": "Ethical Obligations Triggered"
}

Causal Chains (3)

NESS test analysis: Necessary Element of Sufficient Set

Causal Language: Engineer Doe's professional ethical obligations are automatically activated when XYZ presents contradictory data at public hearing

Necessary Factors (NESS):

Engineer Doe's knowledge of true environmental conditions
XYZ Corporation's presentation of contradictory data
Public forum where false information could mislead stakeholders
Professional engineering code of ethics requirements

Sufficient Factors:

Combination of engineer's knowledge + false public statements + professional ethical duties

Counterfactual Test: Without contradictory data presentation, Engineer Doe's ethical obligations would not have been triggered in this specific manner

Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Engineer Doe
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:

Contract Termination Decision
XYZ Corporation terminates Engineer Doe's contract to prevent written documentation
Contradictory Data Presentation
XYZ Corporation presents data contradicting Engineer Doe's findings at public hearing
Ethical Obligations Triggered
Engineer Doe's professional ethical obligations are activated due to false public statements

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#CausalChain_9e12d9e6",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer Doe\u0027s professional ethical obligations are automatically activated when XYZ presents contradictory data at public hearing",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "XYZ Corporation terminates Engineer Doe\u0027s contract to prevent written documentation",
      "proeth:element": "Contract Termination Decision",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "XYZ Corporation presents data contradicting Engineer Doe\u0027s findings at public hearing",
      "proeth:element": "Contradictory Data Presentation",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer Doe\u0027s professional ethical obligations are activated due to false public statements",
      "proeth:element": "Ethical Obligations Triggered",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Contradictory Data Presentation",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without contradictory data presentation, Engineer Doe\u0027s ethical obligations would not have been triggered in this specific manner",
  "proeth:effect": "Ethical Obligations Triggered",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer Doe\u0027s knowledge of true environmental conditions",
    "XYZ Corporation\u0027s presentation of contradictory data",
    "Public forum where false information could mislead stakeholders",
    "Professional engineering code of ethics requirements"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer Doe",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Combination of engineer\u0027s knowledge + false public statements + professional ethical duties"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: XYZ Corporation hired Engineer Doe to conduct consulting studies after receiving 60-day permit deadline

Necessary Factors (NESS):

60-day deadline established by pollution authority
XYZ Corporation's need for environmental compliance data
Regulatory requirement for technical studies

Sufficient Factors:

Combination of regulatory deadline + compliance requirement + need for technical expertise

Counterfactual Test: Without the permit deadline, XYZ Corporation would not have urgently needed consulting services

Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: XYZ Corporation
Type: indirect
Within Agent Control: No

Causal Sequence:

Permit Deadline Imposed
Pollution authority establishes 60-day deadline for environmental permit compliance
Hiring Engineering Consultant
XYZ Corporation hires Engineer Doe to conduct required environmental studies

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#CausalChain_691e5b8d",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "XYZ Corporation hired Engineer Doe to conduct consulting studies after receiving 60-day permit deadline",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Pollution authority establishes 60-day deadline for environmental permit compliance",
      "proeth:element": "Permit Deadline Imposed",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "XYZ Corporation hires Engineer Doe to conduct required environmental studies",
      "proeth:element": "Hiring Engineering Consultant",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Permit Deadline Imposed",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the permit deadline, XYZ Corporation would not have urgently needed consulting services",
  "proeth:effect": "Hiring Engineering Consultant",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "60-day deadline established by pollution authority",
    "XYZ Corporation\u0027s need for environmental compliance data",
    "Regulatory requirement for technical studies"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "indirect",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "XYZ Corporation",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Combination of regulatory deadline + compliance requirement + need for technical expertise"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": false
}

Causal Language: XYZ Corporation terminated Engineer Doe's contract and instructed him not to provide a written report after he verbally reported discharge violations

Necessary Factors (NESS):

Discovery of discharge violations
Verbal communication of unfavorable findings to XYZ Corporation
XYZ Corporation's knowledge of potential liability

Sufficient Factors:

Combination of violation discovery + corporate knowledge + financial/legal risk awareness

Counterfactual Test: Without the verbal report of violations, XYZ Corporation would not have terminated the contract to suppress findings

Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: XYZ Corporation
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:

Discharge Violations Discovered
Engineer Doe's technical studies reveal environmental discharge violations
Verbal Findings Report
Engineer Doe verbally reports violation findings to XYZ Corporation
Contract Termination Decision
XYZ Corporation terminates contract and instructs against written report

RDF JSON-LD

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/72#CausalChain_737a131e",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "XYZ Corporation terminated Engineer Doe\u0027s contract and instructed him not to provide a written report after he verbally reported discharge violations",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer Doe\u0027s technical studies reveal environmental discharge violations",
      "proeth:element": "Discharge Violations Discovered",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer Doe verbally reports violation findings to XYZ Corporation",
      "proeth:element": "Verbal Findings Report",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "XYZ Corporation terminates contract and instructs against written report",
      "proeth:element": "Contract Termination Decision",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Verbal Findings Report",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the verbal report of violations, XYZ Corporation would not have terminated the contract to suppress findings",
  "proeth:effect": "Contract Termination Decision",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Discovery of discharge violations",
    "Verbal communication of unfavorable findings to XYZ Corporation",
    "XYZ Corporation\u0027s knowledge of potential liability"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "XYZ Corporation",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Combination of violation discovery + corporate knowledge + financial/legal risk awareness"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Allen Temporal Relations (4)

Interval algebra relationships with OWL-Time standard properties

From Entity	Allen Relation	To Entity	OWL-Time Property	Evidence
contract termination	before Entity1 is before Entity2	public hearing announcement	`time:before` http://www.w3.org/2006/time#before	Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe... Thereafter, Doe learns that the au...
verbal findings report	before Entity1 is before Entity2	XYZ presenting contradictory data	`time:before` http://www.w3.org/2006/time#before	Doe verbally advises the XYZ Corporation of his findings... the XYZ Corporation has presented data t...
study completion	before Entity1 is before Entity2	written report completion	`time:before` http://www.w3.org/2006/time#before	After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report
contract termination	before Entity1 is before Entity2	verbal advice to corporation	`time:before` http://www.w3.org/2006/time#before	Doe verbally advises the XYZ Corporation of his findings. Subsequently, the corporation terminates t...

About Allen Relations & OWL-Time

Allen's Interval Algebra provides 13 basic temporal relations between intervals. These relations are mapped to OWL-Time standard properties for interoperability with Semantic Web temporal reasoning systems and SPARQL queries.

Each relation includes both a ProEthica custom property and a time:* OWL-Time property for maximum compatibility.

PASS 3: Temporal Dynamics

Extraction Complete

Timeline Overview

Temporal Markers

Temporal Consistency Check

Extracted Actions (4)

Hiring Engineering Consultant XYZ Corporation (Management)

Fulfills Obligations:

Guided By Principles:

Required Capabilities:

Scenario Metadata

Verbal Findings Report Engineer Doe (Consulting Engineer)

Fulfills Obligations:

Guided By Principles:

Required Capabilities:

Scenario Metadata

Contract Termination Decision XYZ Corporation (Management)

Fulfills Obligations:

Guided By Principles:

Required Capabilities:

Scenario Metadata

Contradictory Data Presentation XYZ Corporation (Management)

Guided By Principles:

Required Capabilities:

Scenario Metadata

Extracted Events (3)

Permit Deadline Imposed

Activates Constraints:

Scenario Metadata

Discharge Violations Discovered

Activates Constraints:

Scenario Metadata

Ethical Obligations Triggered

Activates Constraints:

Scenario Metadata

Causal Chains (3)

Contradictory Data Presentation Ethical Obligations Triggered

Necessary Factors (NESS):

Sufficient Factors:

Responsibility Attribution:

Causal Sequence:

Permit Deadline Imposed Hiring Engineering Consultant

Necessary Factors (NESS):

Sufficient Factors:

Responsibility Attribution:

Causal Sequence:

Verbal Findings Report Contract Termination Decision

Necessary Factors (NESS):

Sufficient Factors:

Responsibility Attribution:

Causal Sequence:

Allen Temporal Relations (4)

About Allen Relations & OWL-Time