This page shows the pre-commit working store (the raw extraction under review). This case was committed to OntServe on 2026-10-24 07:56; the committed record differs by design (deduplication, typing, and agent binding are applied at commit). View the committed record
Overview
Facts Discussion
Provenance Draft

PASS 1: Contextual Framework Facts Section

Case 75: Obligation to Former Employer and Former Client Following Acceptance of Position with State

R Roles
1
Classes
9
Individuals
S States
5
Classes
6
Individuals
Rs Resources
1
Classes
1
Individuals

Extracted Ontology Entities

23 RDF entities extracted organized by concept type

R Roles

Roles Classes
1
changed
PublicResponsibilityRole
rdfs:subClassOf Roles
New C75
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A participant role of a party, such as a state agency or members of the public and other water users, that files formal objections to a water-rights application during the court approval process. The role carries standing as an opposing party in the proceeding without profession-generated duties articulated by the case.
Properties
Text References:
"Objections from the public/other water users"
"resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)"
Confidence: 0.85
Role Kind: participant
Distinguishing Features:
  • Files formal objections to a water-rights application in the court process
  • Holds standing as an opposing party in the proceeding without profession-generated duties
[facts] "Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Objections from the public/other water users; resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)
  • roleKind content: participant
  • distinguishingFeatures content: Files formal objections to a water-rights application in the court process; Holds standing as an opposing party in the proceeding without profession-generated duties
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Roles Individuals
9
Linked
Employer Role
C75
Text References:
"Engineer A worked for a private engineering company in the field of water rights."
"The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
Confidence: 0.9
Actor: Private Engineering Firm
Role Class: Employer Role
Role Category: provider_client
Role Kind: participant
Specialty: Water rights engineering
Case Involvement: Employed Engineer A and the other stamping employee, and was hired by a client to complete the water-rights analysis. Engineer A resigned from the firm after step No. 2.
Hasclient: Client
"The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
[facts] "Engineer A worked for a private engineering company in the field of water rights. The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Private Engineering Firm
  • relationships: {'type': 'hasClient', 'target': 'Client', 'quote': 'The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated.'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A worked for a private engineering company in the field of water rights.; The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated.
  • roleClass content: Employer Role
  • roleCategory content: provider_client
  • roleKind content: participant
  • specialty content: Water rights engineering
  • caseInvolvement content: Employed Engineer A and the other stamping employee, and was hired by a client to complete the water-rights analysis. Engineer A resigned from the firm after step No. 2.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Linked
Engineer Role
C75
Text References:
"Engineer A worked for a private engineering company in the field of water rights."
"The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
"Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
"Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2"
"Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report"
Confidence: 0.95
Actor: Engineer A
Role Class: Engineer Role
Role Category: employer_relationship
Role Kind: professional
Specialty: Water rights
Employer: Private engineering company
Technical Background: Water-rights analysis quantifying water and providing terms and conditions for future use
Case Involvement: Participated in the water-rights analysis for the firm's client, stamped the final document with one other employee, worked on the project through step No. 2, then resigned from the firm. He feels he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report.
Stamped document: Stamped the final water-rights analysis document along with one other employee at the firm
Project participation: Worked on the project through step No. 2 (engineering to support application)
Employedby: Private Engineering Firm
"Engineer A worked for a private engineering company in the field of water rights."
[facts] "Engineer A worked for a private engineering company in the field of water rights. The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated. Engineer A, along..."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer A
  • attributes: {'stamped_document': 'Stamped the final water-rights analysis document along with one other employee at the firm', 'project_participation': 'Worked on the project through step No. 2 (engineering to support application)'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'employedBy', 'target': 'Private Engineering Firm', 'quote': 'Engineer A worked for a private engineering company in the field of water rights.'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A worked for a private engineering company in the field of water rights.; The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated.; Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document.; Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2; Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report
  • roleClass content: Engineer Role
  • roleCategory content: employer_relationship
  • roleKind content: professional
  • specialty content: Water rights
  • employer content: Private engineering company
  • technicalBackground content: Water-rights analysis quantifying water and providing terms and conditions for future use
  • caseInvolvement content: Participated in the water-rights analysis for the firm's client, stamped the final document with one other employee, worked on the project through step No. 2, then resigned from the firm. He feels he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report.
  • confidence assessment: 0.95
Linked
Engineer Role
C75
Text References:
"Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
Confidence: 0.8
Actor: Firm Employee
Role Class: Engineer Role
Role Category: employer_relationship
Role Kind: professional
Employer: Private engineering company
Case Involvement: Stamped the final water-rights analysis document along with Engineer A.
Stamped document: Stamped the final water-rights analysis document along with Engineer A
Employedby: Private Engineering Firm
"Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
[facts] "Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Firm Employee
  • attributes: {'stamped_document': 'Stamped the final water-rights analysis document along with Engineer A'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'employedBy', 'target': 'Private Engineering Firm', 'quote': 'Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document.'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document.
  • roleClass content: Engineer Role
  • roleCategory content: employer_relationship
  • roleKind content: professional
  • employer content: Private engineering company
  • caseInvolvement content: Stamped the final water-rights analysis document along with Engineer A.
  • confidence assessment: 0.8
Linked
Client Role
C75
Text References:
"The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
Confidence: 0.9
Actor: Client
Role Class: Client Role
Role Kind: participant
Case Involvement: Hired the private engineering firm to complete a water-rights analysis whose terms and conditions must be approved by the local courts.
[facts] "The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Client
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated.
  • roleClass content: Client Role
  • roleKind content: participant
  • caseInvolvement content: Hired the private engineering firm to complete a water-rights analysis whose terms and conditions must be approved by the local courts.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
State Objector
PublicResponsibilityRole
New C75
Text References:
"resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)"
Confidence: 0.9
Actor: State
Role Class: Objector Role
Role Kind: participant
Additional Relationships: {'type': 'objectsTo', 'target': "Client's water-rights application", 'quote': 'the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis'}
Case Involvement: Is an objector in this specific water-rights analysis, as it typically is in most cases.
Typical posture: The State is typically an objector in most cases
[facts] "Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: State
  • attributes: {'typical_posture': 'The State is typically an objector in most cases'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)
  • roleClass content: Objector Role
  • roleKind content: participant
  • additionalRelationships content: {'type': 'objectsTo', 'target': "Client's water-rights application", 'quote': 'the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis'}
  • caseInvolvement content: Is an objector in this specific water-rights analysis, as it typically is in most cases.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Local Courts Approving Authority
Governmental Authority Role
Linked
Governmental Authority Role
C75
Text References:
"These types of analyses quantify water and provide terms and conditions for future use that must be approved by the local courts."
"Typically, the court process takes years to complete"
Confidence: 0.85
Actor: Local Courts
Role Class: Governmental Authority Role
Role Kind: participant
Case Involvement: Must approve the terms and conditions for future water use produced by the water-rights analysis, through a court process that typically takes years and includes objections, rebuttal, and mediation or trial.
[facts] "These types of analyses quantify water and provide terms and conditions for future use that must be approved by the local courts. Typically, the court process takes years to complete"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Local Courts
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: These types of analyses quantify water and provide terms and conditions for future use that must be approved by the local courts.; Typically, the court process takes years to complete
  • roleClass content: Governmental Authority Role
  • roleKind content: participant
  • caseInvolvement content: Must approve the terms and conditions for future water use produced by the water-rights analysis, through a court process that typically takes years and includes objections, rebuttal, and mediation or trial.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Public Water Users Objectors
PublicResponsibilityRole
New C75
Text References:
"Objections from the public/other water users"
Confidence: 0.8
Actor: Public and Other Water Users
Role Class: Objector Role
Role Kind: participant
Additional Relationships: {'type': 'objectsTo', 'target': "Client's water-rights application", 'quote': 'Objections from the public/other water users'}
Case Involvement: May file objections to the water-rights application at step No. 3 of the court process.
[facts] "Application (proposal) Engineering to support application Objections from the public/other water users Rebuttal of objector’s comments Mediation or trial"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Public and Other Water Users
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Objections from the public/other water users
  • roleClass content: Objector Role
  • roleKind content: participant
  • additionalRelationships content: {'type': 'objectsTo', 'target': "Client's water-rights application", 'quote': 'Objections from the public/other water users'}
  • caseInvolvement content: May file objections to the water-rights application at step No. 3 of the court process.
  • confidence assessment: 0.8
Linked
Engineer Role
C75
Text References:
"Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State"
"In his current employment, he has been isolated from the State’s case in the matter, and his current position does not include opposing this or other cases."
Confidence: 0.9
Actor: Engineer A
Role Class: Engineer Role
Role Category: employer_relationship
Role Kind: professional
Specialty: Water rights
Employer: State
Case Involvement: After resigning from the firm, works for the State, which is an objector in this specific analysis. He has been isolated from the State's case in the matter and his current position does not include opposing this or other cases, but he is concerned about the remaining steps in the court process.
Case isolation: Has been isolated from the State's case in the matter
Position scope: His current position does not include opposing this or other cases
Employedby: State
"resigned from the firm to work for the State"
[facts] "Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases). ...."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: Engineer A
  • attributes: {'case_isolation': "Has been isolated from the State's case in the matter", 'position_scope': 'His current position does not include opposing this or other cases'}
  • relationships: {'type': 'employedBy', 'target': 'State', 'quote': 'resigned from the firm to work for the State'}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State; In his current employment, he has been isolated from the State’s case in the matter, and his current position does not include opposing this or other cases.
  • roleClass content: Engineer Role
  • roleCategory content: employer_relationship
  • roleKind content: professional
  • specialty content: Water rights
  • employer content: State
  • caseInvolvement content: After resigning from the firm, works for the State, which is an objector in this specific analysis. He has been isolated from the State's case in the matter and his current position does not include opposing this or other cases, but he is concerned about the remaining steps in the court process.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
State Employer
Employer Role
Linked
Employer Role
C75
Text References:
"resigned from the firm to work for the State"
"In his current employment, he has been isolated from the State’s case in the matter"
Confidence: 0.85
Actor: State
Role Class: Employer Role
Role Kind: participant
Case Involvement: Current employer of Engineer A, who has been isolated from the State's case in the matter and whose position does not include opposing this or other cases.
Employee isolation: Engineer A has been isolated from the State's case in the matter
[facts] "Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases). ...."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • actor: State
  • attributes: {'employee_isolation': "Engineer A has been isolated from the State's case in the matter"}
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: resigned from the firm to work for the State; In his current employment, he has been isolated from the State’s case in the matter
  • roleClass content: Employer Role
  • roleKind content: participant
  • caseInvolvement content: Current employer of Engineer A, who has been isolated from the State's case in the matter and whose position does not include opposing this or other cases.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85

S States

States Classes
5
changed
Good Faith Belief State
rdfs:subClassOf States
Review
Good Faith Belief State
C75
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
An epistemic condition in which a professional sincerely holds an opinion about his own conduct or work, here Engineer A's feeling that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report.
Inherited from GoodFaithBeliefState · note
An epistemic condition in which professionals sincerely hold their opinions and believe their activities serve the public interest, so their conduct is evaluated on the assumption of good faith rather than on whether the opinions are ultimately justified. Here the Board assumes the engineer-members of the Citizens Committee were sincere in their opinions and believed they were serving the public interest in their activities.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report"
Confidence: 0.75
State Category: epistemic
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Engineer A completes the engineering work included in the stamped report
Termination Conditions: Engineer A revises his view of the work
Principle Transformation: The honesty owed about one's own work is made concrete as a felt readiness to stand behind the stamped report if called upon in later steps.
[facts] "Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report, but he is concerned about the remaining steps in the court process."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report
  • stateCategory content: epistemic
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The honesty owed about one's own work is made concrete as a felt readiness to stand behind the stamped report if called upon in later steps.
  • confidence assessment: 0.75
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Engineer A completes the engineering work included in the stamped report
  • terminationConditions: Engineer A revises his view of the work
changed
ConflictOfInterestState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Conflict Of Interest State
C75
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A condition in which an agent holds competing interests or loyalties, or competing role-derived duties, that cannot all be fully served, here the condition of an engineer who stamped a water-rights analysis for a former employer's client and now works for the State, which is an objector in that same analysis, so the engineer's loyalty to the prior work stands in potential tension with the interests of the new public employer.
Inherited from ConflictOfInterestState · note
A condition in which an agent holds competing interests or loyalties, or competing role-derived duties, that cannot all be fully served and that bias or constrain the exercise of professional judgment. As a content kind it is the standing tension among interests, covering both conflict of interest and competing duties. Its deontic relevance is that it renders the affected obligations defeasible against one another and grounds the competesWith, prevailsOver, and defeasibleUnder edge family.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)."
"he is concerned about the remaining steps in the court process"
Confidence: 0.9
State Category: conflict_of_interest
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Engineer A resigns from the firm and begins employment with the State, an objector in the analysis he stamped
Termination Conditions:
  • The court process concludes
  • Engineer A's connection to the matter is fully severed
Obligation Activation: Duty to avoid participating in matters adverse to work performed for a former client
Action Constraints: Isolation from the State's case in the matter
Principle Transformation: The faithfulness owed to the prior stamped work becomes a concrete need to remain screened from the State's opposition to that same analysis.
[facts] "Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases).; he is concerned about the remaining steps in the court process
  • stateCategory content: conflict_of_interest
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The faithfulness owed to the prior stamped work becomes a concrete need to remain screened from the State's opposition to that same analysis.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Engineer A resigns from the firm and begins employment with the State, an objector in the analysis he stamped
  • terminationConditions: The court process concludes; Engineer A's connection to the matter is fully severed
  • obligationActivation: Duty to avoid participating in matters adverse to work performed for a former client
  • actionConstraints: Isolation from the State's case in the matter
changed
PriorEngagementKnowledgeState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Linked
Prior Engagement Knowledge State
C75
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
An epistemic condition in which a professional, through a prior engagement, has gained particular and specialized knowledge in connection with a specific project, here Engineer A's participation in the water-rights analysis for the firm's client through the engineering step, so that later employment connected with the same matter carries that acquired knowledge.
Inherited from PriorEngagementKnowledgeState · note
An epistemic condition in which a professional, through a prior engagement, has gained particular and specialized knowledge in connection with a specific project, so that later service in connection with the same project carries that acquired knowledge into the new engagement. Here Engineer A's study of the causes of the dam failure for the U.S. government gives Engineer A specialized knowledge of the very project on which the contractor later retains him.
Properties
Text References:
"The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
"Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2"
Confidence: 0.9
State Category: epistemic
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Engineer A participates in the water-rights analysis for the firm's client
Termination Conditions: The knowledge is not terminated by an event, it persists after the engagement ends
Obligation Activation: Duty not to use knowledge from a former engagement adversely to the former client without consent
Action Constraints: Isolation from the State's case in the matter
Principle Transformation: The general loyalty owed to a former client's project becomes a concrete condition on how the knowledge gained there may be carried into the new employment.
[facts] "The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated.; Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2
  • stateCategory content: epistemic
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The general loyalty owed to a former client's project becomes a concrete condition on how the knowledge gained there may be carried into the new employment.
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Engineer A participates in the water-rights analysis for the firm's client
  • terminationConditions: The knowledge is not terminated by an event, it persists after the engagement ends
  • obligationActivation: Duty not to use knowledge from a former engagement adversely to the former client without consent
  • actionConstraints: Isolation from the State's case in the matter
changed
SealAuthorityState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Review
Seal Authority State
C75
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A regulatory condition concerning the application of a professional engineer's seal or stamp to a work product, here the condition in which Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final water-rights analysis document, so responsibility for the stamped report attaches to him.
Inherited from SealAuthorityState · note
A regulatory condition concerning the application of a professional engineer's seal to a work product, here a draft report submitted to the client with language clearly identifying it as a draft and with the seal applied consistent with state law.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
Confidence: 0.85
State Category: regulatory
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Engineer A stamps the final water-rights analysis document
Termination Conditions: The stamped report is superseded or the court process concludes
Obligation Activation: Duty to stand behind the work included in the stamped report
Principle Transformation: The general responsibility that attaches to sealing work becomes a concrete tie between Engineer A and the water-rights analysis through the remaining court steps.
[facts] "Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document.
  • stateCategory content: regulatory
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The general responsibility that attaches to sealing work becomes a concrete tie between Engineer A and the water-rights analysis through the remaining court steps.
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Engineer A stamps the final water-rights analysis document
  • terminationConditions: The stamped report is superseded or the court process concludes
  • obligationActivation: Duty to stand behind the work included in the stamped report
changed
AdversarialEngagementState
rdfs:subClassOf States
Review
Adversarial Engagement State
C75
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
A temporal condition in which the parties to a matter stand in an adversarial legal posture within a pending court process, here the water-rights analysis awaiting court approval with the State as an objector, so that professional conduct connected to the analysis occurs within the pending objection and rebuttal steps.
Inherited from AdversarialEngagementState · note
A temporal condition in which a claim has been filed and the parties stand in an adversarial legal posture, so professional services rendered occur within a pending dispute over that claim. Here the contractor has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation on the dam project, and Engineer A's retention by the contractor occurs within that pending claim.
Properties
Text References:
"the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)"
"Typically, the court process takes years to complete"
Confidence: 0.8
State Category: temporal
Persistence Type: inertial
Activation Conditions: Objections from the public or other water users are filed in the court process
Termination Conditions: Mediation or trial resolves the matter
Action Constraints: Isolation from the State's case in the matter
Principle Transformation: The pending adversarial posture makes the timing of Engineer A's involvement in the remaining steps ethically material rather than a settled matter.
[facts] "Typically, the court process takes years to complete and, in short, it includes the following steps"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases); Typically, the court process takes years to complete
  • stateCategory content: temporal
  • persistenceType content: inertial
  • principleTransformation content: The pending adversarial posture makes the timing of Engineer A's involvement in the remaining steps ethically material rather than a settled matter.
  • confidence assessment: 0.8
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • activationConditions: Objections from the public or other water users are filed in the court process
  • terminationConditions: Mediation or trial resolves the matter
  • actionConstraints: Isolation from the State's case in the matter
States Individuals
6
changed
Stamped Final Report Condition
Seal Authority State
Review
Seal Authority State
C75
Text References:
"Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
Confidence: 0.86
State Class: Seal Authority State
Subject: The final water-rights analysis document, stamped by Engineer A and one other employee at the firm
Active Period: From the stamping of the final document through the remaining court process
Triggering Event: Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document
Terminated By: Supersession of the stamped report or conclusion of the court process
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • The firm's client
  • The former firm
  • Local courts
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document.
  • stateClass content: Seal Authority State
  • subject content: The final water-rights analysis document, stamped by Engineer A and one other employee at the firm
  • activePeriod content: From the stamping of the final document through the remaining court process
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document
  • terminatedBy content: Supersession of the stamped report or conclusion of the court process
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; The firm's client; The former firm; Local courts
  • confidence assessment: 0.86
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
Objector Employment Conflict Condition
Conflict Of Interest State
Linked
Conflict Of Interest State
C75
Text References:
"Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)."
"he is concerned about the remaining steps in the court process"
Confidence: 0.9
State Class: Conflict Of Interest State
Subject: Engineer A, who stamped the water-rights analysis and now works for the State, an objector in that specific analysis
Active Period: From Engineer A's resignation from the firm and hire by the State through the remaining steps of the court process
Triggering Event: Engineer A resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis
Terminated By: Conclusion of the court process for the water-rights analysis or full severance of Engineer A's connection to the matter
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • The State
  • The firm's client
  • The former firm
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2 and resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases).; he is concerned about the remaining steps in the court process
  • stateClass content: Conflict Of Interest State
  • subject content: Engineer A, who stamped the water-rights analysis and now works for the State, an objector in that specific analysis
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A's resignation from the firm and hire by the State through the remaining steps of the court process
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A resigned from the firm to work for the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis
  • terminatedBy content: Conclusion of the court process for the water-rights analysis or full severance of Engineer A's connection to the matter
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; The State; The firm's client; The former firm
  • confidence assessment: 0.9
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
Water Rights Analysis Knowledge
Prior Engagement Knowledge State
Linked
Prior Engagement Knowledge State
C75
Text References:
"The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
"Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2"
Confidence: 0.88
State Class: Prior Engagement Knowledge State
Subject: Engineer A, holding specialized knowledge of the water-rights analysis from his participation through the engineering step
Active Period: From Engineer A's participation in the water-rights analysis onward, persisting after his resignation
Triggering Event: Engineer A participated in the water-rights analysis and worked on the project through step No. 2
Terminated By: Not terminated by any event in the case, the knowledge persists
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • The firm's client
  • The State
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated.; Engineer A worked on the project through step No. 2
  • stateClass content: Prior Engagement Knowledge State
  • subject content: Engineer A, holding specialized knowledge of the water-rights analysis from his participation through the engineering step
  • activePeriod content: From Engineer A's participation in the water-rights analysis onward, persisting after his resignation
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A participated in the water-rights analysis and worked on the project through step No. 2
  • terminatedBy content: Not terminated by any event in the case, the knowledge persists
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; The firm's client; The State
  • confidence assessment: 0.88
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
Isolation From State Case
Practice Area Separation State
Review
Practice Area Separation State
C75
Text References:
"In his current employment, he has been isolated from the State’s case in the matter, and his current position does not include opposing this or other cases."
Confidence: 0.87
State Class: Practice Area Separation State
Subject: Engineer A's current position with the State, which is isolated from the State's case in the matter
Active Period: From the start of Engineer A's employment with the State while the isolation arrangement holds
Triggering Event: Engineer A was isolated from the State's case upon beginning his current employment
Terminated By: A change in Engineer A's position that would include work on this or other opposing cases
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • The State
  • The firm's client
Urgency Level: low
[facts] "In his current employment, he has been isolated from the State’s case in the matter, and his current position does not include opposing this or other cases."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: In his current employment, he has been isolated from the State’s case in the matter, and his current position does not include opposing this or other cases.
  • stateClass content: Practice Area Separation State
  • subject content: Engineer A's current position with the State, which is isolated from the State's case in the matter
  • activePeriod content: From the start of Engineer A's employment with the State while the isolation arrangement holds
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A was isolated from the State's case upon beginning his current employment
  • terminatedBy content: A change in Engineer A's position that would include work on this or other opposing cases
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; The State; The firm's client
  • confidence assessment: 0.87
  • urgencyLevel assessment: low
changed
Pending Water Rights Court Process
Adversarial Engagement State
Review
Adversarial Engagement State
C75
Text References:
"Typically, the court process takes years to complete"
"the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)"
Confidence: 0.8
State Class: Adversarial Engagement State
Subject: The water-rights analysis matter, pending in the court process with the State as an objector
Active Period: From the filing of the application through mediation or trial, a process that typically takes years
Triggering Event: Objections from the public and other water users, including the State, arise in the court process
Terminated By: Resolution of the matter through mediation or trial
Affected Parties:
  • The firm's client
  • The State
  • Other water users
  • Engineer A
Urgency Level: medium
[facts] "Typically, the court process takes years to complete and, in short, it includes the following steps"
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Typically, the court process takes years to complete; the State, who is an objector in this specific analysis (the State is typically an objector in most cases)
  • stateClass content: Adversarial Engagement State
  • subject content: The water-rights analysis matter, pending in the court process with the State as an objector
  • activePeriod content: From the filing of the application through mediation or trial, a process that typically takes years
  • triggeringEvent content: Objections from the public and other water users, including the State, arise in the court process
  • terminatedBy content: Resolution of the matter through mediation or trial
  • affectedParties content: The firm's client; The State; Other water users; Engineer A
  • confidence assessment: 0.8
  • urgencyLevel assessment: medium
changed
Belief In Supporting Stamped Work
Good Faith Belief State
Review
Good Faith Belief State
C75
Text References:
"Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report"
Confidence: 0.78
State Class: Good Faith Belief State
Subject: Engineer A, who feels he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report
Active Period: From completion of the stamped report and continuing during the pending court process
Triggering Event: Engineer A performed and stamped the work included in the final report
Terminated By: Any change in Engineer A's assessment of the work
Affected Parties:
  • Engineer A
  • The firm's client
Urgency Level: low
[facts] "Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report, but he is concerned about the remaining steps in the court process."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report
  • stateClass content: Good Faith Belief State
  • subject content: Engineer A, who feels he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report
  • activePeriod content: From completion of the stamped report and continuing during the pending court process
  • triggeringEvent content: Engineer A performed and stamped the work included in the final report
  • terminatedBy content: Any change in Engineer A's assessment of the work
  • affectedParties content: Engineer A; The firm's client
  • confidence assessment: 0.78
  • urgencyLevel assessment: low

Rs Resources

Resources Classes
1
changed
Reference Material
rdfs:subClassOf Resources
Linked
Reference Material
C75
Definition
Extracted from facts primary
Handbooks, manuals, reports, and other documentation supporting professional practice with technical and procedural knowledge, here the kind of stamped engineering analysis report prepared to support a water-rights court application.
Inherited from ReferenceMaterial · note
Handbooks, manuals, guides, and other documentation supporting professional practice with technical and procedural knowledge.
Properties
Text References:
"Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
"These types of analyses quantify water and provide terms and conditions for future use that must be approved by the local courts."
Confidence: 0.85
Resource Category: reference_material
[facts] "The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated. Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document.; These types of analyses quantify water and provide terms and conditions for future use that must be approved by the local courts.
  • resourceCategory content: reference_material
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Resources Individuals
1
Linked
Reference Material
C75
Text References:
"Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
"Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report"
Confidence: 0.85
Resource Class: Reference Material
Topic: water-rights analysis quantifying water and providing terms and conditions for future use
Used By: Engineer A
[facts] "The firm was hired by a client to complete a water-rights analysis in which Engineer A participated. Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document."
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • usedBy: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • textReferences content: Engineer A, along with one other employee at the firm, stamped the final document.; Engineer A feels that he can and should support the work he performed and which was included in the stamped report
  • resourceClass content: Reference Material
  • topic content: water-rights analysis quantifying water and providing terms and conditions for future use
  • confidence assessment: 0.85
Pass 1: Contextual Framework - Facts
Review extracted entities, then continue to the next step
Continue to Discussion Review
Case texts: National Society of Professional Engineers, Board of Ethical Review.

NOTE: The NSPE Board of Ethical Review considers ethical cases involving either real or hypothetical matters submitted to it from NSPE members, other engineers, public officials, and members of the public. The BER reviews each case in the context of the NSPE Code of Ethics and earlier BER opinions. The facts contained in each case do not necessarily represent all of the pertinent facts submitted to or reviewed by the BER and shall not be considered a direct evaluation of any real matter that may have been submitted.

Each opinion is intended as guidance to individual practicing engineers, students, and the public. In regard to the question of application of the NSPE Code of Ethics to engineering organizations (e.g., corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, government agencies, and university engineering departments), the specific business form or type should not negate nor detract from the conformance of individuals to the Code. The NSPE Code deals with professional services, which must be performed by real persons. Real persons in turn establish and implement policies within business structures.

This opinion is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. It may be reprinted without further permission, provided that this statement is included before or after the text of the case and appropriate attribution is provided to the National Society of Professional Engineers' Board of Ethical Review.

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3