{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_RFP_Response_Submission",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A\u0027s firm decided to respond to the local public agency\u0027s RFP for dam design, submitting an impressive brochure and completing a personal interview, thereby implicitly committing to deliver a complete and competent design within the project\u0027s stated time parameters.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Design Engineer, firm principal",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Commitment to deliverables within time parameters that may prove difficult to meet"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Obligation to perform services within area of competence by representing the firm as capable"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Professional competence",
    "Honest representation to client"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Design Contract Obligation Active",
    "Client Reliance on Engineer A"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Win the design contract for the dam project",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Dam design expertise",
    "Project scoping and scheduling judgment"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Pre-contract phase, prior to contract award",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 2,
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "RFP Response Submission"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Incomplete_Work_Submission",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A decided to submit drawings and specifications that he knew to be incomplete by the specified deadline, citing time pressure as justification, rather than requesting an extension or otherwise seeking relief from the schedule constraint.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Design Engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Submission of documents insufficient to support construction",
    "Risk of increased project costs"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Completeness of professional deliverables",
    "Honest representation to client",
    "Public fund stewardship"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Incomplete Documents in Circulation",
    "Public Safety Risk Latent",
    "Unjustified Expenditure of Public Funds Risk"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Meet the contractual delivery deadline and avoid conflict with the client over schedule",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Dam design to completion",
    "Scheduling judgment to flag infeasible deadlines",
    "Conformance with applicable engineering standards"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Design phase, at the deadline for deliverable submission",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 5,
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Obligation to provide complete design drawings and specifications",
    "Obligation to avoid deceptive acts",
    "Obligation to perform services within area of competence"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Incomplete Work Submission"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Non-Disclosure_of_Incompleteness",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A decided not to inform the local public agency, the federal funding agency, or any other stakeholder that the submitted drawings and specifications were incomplete, privately rationalizing that federal funds would cover any resulting cost overruns.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Design Engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Client and federal agency proceed without knowledge of deficiencies",
    "Increased risk of cost overruns charged to federal funds",
    "Contractor awarded work based on deficient documents"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Transparency with clients and public agencies",
    "Honest representation to client",
    "Public fund stewardship"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Stakeholder Uninformed of Deficiencies",
    "Misrepresentation of Deliverable Completeness"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Avoid accountability for incomplete work and preserve the client relationship by assuming federal funds would absorb additional costs",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Professional judgment to communicate limitations to client",
    "Ethical obligation to disclose known deficiencies"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Design phase, concurrent with and following submission of incomplete documents",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 6,
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Obligation to avoid deceptive acts",
    "Obligation to provide complete design drawings and specifications",
    "Obligation of honest disclosure to client and funding agency",
    "Public fund stewardship"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Non-Disclosure of Incompleteness"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Incomplete_Documents_Approval",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer B, acting on behalf of the federal funding agency\u0027s engineering staff, decided to approve Engineer A\u0027s incomplete drawings and specifications without flagging identified or identifiable deficiencies or escalating the review to a more competent reviewer.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Federal Agency Engineering Staff Reviewer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Incomplete documents advanced to bidding without correction",
    "Federal funds committed to a project with deficient design basis"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Competence in professional review",
    "Responsible stewardship of federal funds",
    "Honest representation to client"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer B",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Federal Approval of Deficient Documents",
    "Project Cleared for Bidding"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Complete the federal review and approval process to allow the project to proceed to bidding",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Dam design review expertise",
    "Ability to identify incomplete or non-conforming engineering documents",
    "Judgment to escalate review beyond personal competence"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Review phase, prior to project advertisement for bids",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 7,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Federal Review Process Active"
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Obligation to perform services within area of competence",
    "Obligation to recognize limits of competency and escalate appropriately",
    "Public fund stewardship"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Incomplete Documents Approval"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Low_Bid_Submission",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer C, as owner of Hi-Lo Construction, decided to submit the low bid on the dam project based on documents that, upon review, should have revealed incompleteness and unbuildable elements, without seeking clarification from the owner or Engineer A and without adjusting the bid to reflect the additional work required.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Owner, Hi-Lo Construction",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Exposure to cost overruns and constructability problems arising from deficient documents",
    "Risk of contract performance on an unbuildable design"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Informed risk assessment before bidding",
    "Professional competence",
    "Honest representation to client"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer C",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Construction Contract Awarded on Deficient Documents",
    "Contractor Exposed to Unbuildable Conditions"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Win the construction contract by submitting the lowest bid",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Construction document review and evaluation",
    "Engineering judgment to identify unbuildable or incomplete design elements",
    "Bid preparation reflecting actual project risks"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Bidding phase, prior to contract award",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 10,
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Obligation to perform services within area of competence",
    "Obligation to make an informed professional judgment before committing to contract performance"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Low Bid Submission"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Reactive_Incompleteness_Acknowledgment",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "At the pre-construction conference, Engineer A acknowledged the incompleteness of the drawings and specifications only after Engineer C raised the issue and declared portions of the project unbuildable, rather than proactively disclosing the deficiencies to any stakeholder at any earlier point.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Design Engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Disclosure at this stage provides no remedial benefit to the design process",
    "Acknowledgment exposes Engineer A to professional and legal scrutiny"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Transparency with clients and public agencies",
    "Honest representation to client",
    "Public fund stewardship"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "reactive",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Incompleteness Publicly Acknowledged",
    "Project Delay Risk Active"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Respond to Engineer C\u0027s challenge by acknowledging the known deficiencies while deflecting responsibility to time pressure and anticipated federal funding",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Professional candor",
    "Timely disclosure of known deficiencies"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Pre-construction conference, after contract award to Hi-Lo Construction",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 14,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Stakeholder Uninformed of Deficiencies"
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Obligation to avoid deceptive acts",
    "Obligation of honest disclosure to client and funding agency",
    "Obligation to provide complete design drawings and specifications"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Reactive Incompleteness Acknowledgment"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Federal_Grant_Involvement",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Federal funding and associated federal agency oversight became part of the project structure, introducing a second reviewing authority.",
  "proeth:description": "The dam project was partially funded by a federal grant, which brought federal oversight requirements and Engineer B\u0027s review role into the project.",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Federal Oversight Active",
    "Federal Review Requirement"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "medium",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Pre-design phase, established before RFP issuance",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 1,
  "rdfs:label": "Federal Grant Involvement"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Design_Contract_Award",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_RFP_Response_Submission",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Engineer A\u0027s firm transitioned from bidder status to contracted design engineer for the dam project.",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A\u0027s firm was awarded the design contract by the local public agency following submission of an impressive brochure and completion of a personal interview.",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Active Design Contract",
    "Professional Responsibility Incumbent on Engineer A"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "routine",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Early project phase, after RFP response and interview",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 3,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Open Competitive Bidding State for Design Services"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Design Contract Award"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Document_Incompleteness_Occurrence",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Incomplete_Work_Submission",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Project documentation entered a deficient state, with gaps that made construction guidance unreliable and portions of the project potentially unbuildable.",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A\u0027s drawings and specifications were produced in a knowingly incomplete state, creating a condition of deficient project documentation that would affect all downstream project phases.",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Deficient Documentation State",
    "Public Safety Risk",
    "Contractor Exposure to Ambiguity"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "high",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Design phase, prior to document submission for review",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 4,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Complete Design Deliverable Expected State"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Document Incompleteness Occurrence"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Federal_Review_Completion",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Incomplete_Documents_Approval",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "The incomplete documents acquired an official federal approval status, removing a gatekeeping barrier and allowing the deficient project to advance to public bidding.",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer B, acting as the federal funding agency\u0027s engineering staff reviewer, completed a review of the incomplete documents and approved them without identifying or flagging the deficiencies.",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Federally Approved Deficient Documents State",
    "Bid Advertisement Permissible State"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "high",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Post-submission, prior to bid advertisement",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 8,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Federal Review Pending State"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Federal Review Completion"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Bid_Advertisement",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Incomplete_Documents_Approval",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "The project entered the public procurement phase, exposing contractors to the deficient documents as the basis for their bids.",
  "proeth:description": "The dam project was advertised for bids to the public following federal approval of the incomplete documents, initiating the contractor selection process.",
  "proeth:eventType": "automatic_trigger",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Open Bidding State",
    "Contractor Exposure to Deficient Documents"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "medium",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After federal approval, prior to bid submission deadline",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 9,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Pre-Bid Design Phase"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Bid Advertisement"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Contract_Award_to_Contractor",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Low_Bid_Submission",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Engineer C\u0027s firm transitioned from bidder to awarded contractor, taking on construction responsibility under documents that were deficient.",
  "proeth:description": "Hi-Lo Construction, owned by Engineer C, was identified as the winning low bidder and awarded the construction contract for the dam project.",
  "proeth:eventType": "automatic_trigger",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Active Construction Contract",
    "Contractor Bound to Deficient Documents"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "medium",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After bid submission deadline, prior to pre-construction conference",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 11,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Open Bidding State"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Contract Award to Contractor"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Pre-Construction_Conference",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "All key parties were assembled in a formal setting where document deficiencies became the subject of open acknowledgment, moving the incompleteness from a concealed state to a disclosed state.",
  "proeth:description": "A pre-construction conference was convened bringing together Engineer A, Engineer C, and the agency, at which the deficiencies in the project documents were first openly discussed.",
  "proeth:eventType": "automatic_trigger",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Disclosed Incompleteness State",
    "Construction Start Pending State"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "high",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After contract award, before construction commencement",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 12,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Non-Disclosure of Incompleteness State"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Pre-Construction Conference"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Unbuildability_Declaration",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Reactive_Incompleteness_Acknowledgment",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "The project\u0027s constructability was formally placed in question, creating an impasse that prevented construction from proceeding as documented and exposing the full scope of the document deficiencies.",
  "proeth:description": "At the pre-construction conference, Engineer C declared that portions of the dam project were unbuildable, surfacing the practical construction consequences of the document deficiencies.",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Constructability Impasse",
    "Public Safety Risk",
    "Project Dispute State"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "critical",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "During the pre-construction conference",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 13,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Construction Start Permissible State"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Unbuildability Declaration"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Event_Incompleteness_Acknowledgment_Event",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#Action_Reactive_Incompleteness_Acknowledgment",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "The incompleteness of the project documents became a matter of official record acknowledged by the design engineer, triggering formal accountability and the need for remediation.",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A acknowledged at the pre-construction conference that the submitted drawings and specifications were incomplete, confirming what had previously been concealed from the agency and contractor.",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Official Incompleteness Record",
    "Remediation Required State",
    "Engineer A Liability Exposure"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "high",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "During the pre-construction conference, following Engineer C\u0027s declaration",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 15,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Non-Disclosure of Incompleteness State"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Incompleteness Acknowledgment Event"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_ea4423c2",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "At the pre-construction conference, it is pointed out by Engineer C, owner of Hi-Lo Construction, that much of the design detail is lacking",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Hi-Lo awarded the contract",
      "proeth:element": "Contract Award to Contractor",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Parties convene to begin project planning",
      "proeth:element": "Pre-Construction Conference",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Contract Award to Contractor",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the contract award, the pre-construction conference would not have been convened",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Pre-Construction Conference",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Award of construction contract to Hi-Lo",
    "Standard pre-construction conference practice",
    "Parties available to convene"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "indirect",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Local public agency / project parties",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Contract award triggering the standard pre-construction conference"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_c004351d",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer A decided to submit drawings and specifications that he knew to be incomplete by the specified date... while much of the information was missing from the drawings and specifications",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A submits knowingly incomplete drawings and specifications",
      "proeth:element": "Incomplete Work Submission",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Drawings and specifications exist in a knowingly incomplete state",
      "proeth:element": "Document Incompleteness Occurrence",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Incomplete Work Submission",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Had Engineer A completed the full design as required, the incompleteness would not have occurred",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Document Incompleteness Occurrence",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer A\u0027s decision to submit despite incompleteness",
    "Time pressure to deliver by a specified date",
    "Engineer A\u0027s expectation that federal funds would cover added costs"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Decision to deliver incomplete documents under deadline pressure with reliance on federal funding"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_ff7980a3",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "did not inform anyone as to their incompleteness",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A withholds knowledge of incompleteness from all parties",
      "proeth:element": "Non-Disclosure of Incompleteness",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer B reviews the incomplete plans without catching defects",
      "proeth:element": "Federal Review Completion",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer B approves the incomplete drawings and specifications",
      "proeth:element": "Incomplete Documents Approval",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Non-Disclosure of Incompleteness",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Had Engineer A disclosed the incompleteness, Engineer B would likely not have approved the plans",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Incomplete Documents Approval",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer A\u0027s silence about the incompleteness",
    "Engineer B\u0027s lack of independent identification of the defects",
    "Local agency\u0027s lack of in-house technical review capability"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "shared",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Non-disclosure combined with inadequate federal review"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_d039dddd",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "the project is thereafter duly advertised for bids and a contract is awarded to the low bidder, Hi-Lo Construction",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Project advertised to the public for bids",
      "proeth:element": "Bid Advertisement",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer C submits the low bid for Hi-Lo Construction",
      "proeth:element": "Low Bid Submission",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Bid Advertisement",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the bid advertisement, Engineer C could not have submitted a bid",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Low Bid Submission",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Public advertisement of the project for bids",
    "Engineer C\u0027s decision to bid",
    "Available bidding documents for review"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer C",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Advertised project opportunity prompting Hi-Lo\u0027s bid submission"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_f0d7bc08",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "a contract is awarded to the low bidder, Hi-Lo Construction",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer C submits lowest bid",
      "proeth:element": "Low Bid Submission",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Hi-Lo Construction awarded the construction contract",
      "proeth:element": "Contract Award to Contractor",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Low Bid Submission",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without submitting the low bid, Hi-Lo would not have been awarded the contract",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Contract Award to Contractor",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer C\u0027s submission of the lowest bid",
    "Standard low-bidder award process",
    "Completion of bid advertisement"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer C",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Submission of the lowest bid in a low-bid procurement"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_2d61c4e0",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "At the pre-construction conference, it is pointed out by Engineer C, owner of Hi-Lo Construction, that much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are \"unbuildable\" without major changes",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Parties convene for the conference",
      "proeth:element": "Pre-Construction Conference",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer C declares parts of the project unbuildable without major changes",
      "proeth:element": "Unbuildability Declaration",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Pre-Construction Conference",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the conference, Engineer C\u0027s unbuildability declaration would not have been made at that point",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Unbuildability Declaration",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Convening of the pre-construction conference",
    "Engineer C\u0027s review identifying missing design detail",
    "Pre-existing document incompleteness"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer C",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Conference forum combined with Engineer C\u0027s recognition of incomplete documents"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_73959084",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer A generally agrees with Hi-Lo\u0027s characterization, but in his defense responds that he felt pressured to deliver the drawings and specifications on a specified date",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer C declares portions unbuildable",
      "proeth:element": "Unbuildability Declaration",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A agrees and cites deadline pressure and reliance on federal funds",
      "proeth:element": "Reactive Incompleteness Acknowledgment",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Unbuildability Declaration",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without Engineer C raising the issue, Engineer A would likely not have acknowledged the incompleteness at that time",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Reactive Incompleteness Acknowledgment",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer C\u0027s declaration of unbuildability",
    "Engineer A\u0027s presence at the conference",
    "Engineer A\u0027s awareness that documents were incomplete"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Engineer C\u0027s challenge prompting Engineer A\u0027s defensive acknowledgment"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_ce4f3b16",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "The signed and sealed drawings and specifications are ultimately approved by Engineer B of the engineering staff of the federal agency funding the project",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Federal grant partially funds the dam project",
      "proeth:element": "Federal Grant Involvement",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer B reviews documents on behalf of federal agency",
      "proeth:element": "Federal Review Completion",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Federal Grant Involvement",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the federal grant, the federal agency review by Engineer B would not have been required",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Federal Review Completion",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Federal grant partially funding the project",
    "Federal oversight requirement triggering review",
    "Engineer B assigned as reviewer"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "indirect",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Federal funding agency",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Federal funding requiring federal engineering review of the documents"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_3de9388d",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer A\u0027s firm\u0027s impressive brochure and personal interview results in the award of a contract for the design, drawings, and specifications.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A\u0027s firm responds to the local public agency\u0027s RFP with brochure and interview",
      "proeth:element": "RFP Response Submission",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Local agency awards design contract to Engineer A\u0027s firm",
      "proeth:element": "Design Contract Award",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "RFP Response Submission",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the RFP response and impressive presentation, Engineer A\u0027s firm would not have been awarded the design contract",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Design Contract Award",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer A\u0027s firm responding to the RFP",
    "Impressive brochure and personal interview",
    "Local agency\u0027s selection process"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A\u0027s firm",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Combination of submitted RFP response + impressive brochure + successful personal interview"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/85#CausalChain_048baa69",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "the signed and sealed drawings and specifications are ultimately approved by Engineer B of the engineering staff of the federal agency funding the project, and the project is thereafter duly advertised for bids",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer B approves the incomplete plans",
      "proeth:element": "Incomplete Documents Approval",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Project advertised for public bids based on approved documents",
      "proeth:element": "Bid Advertisement",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Incomplete Documents Approval",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without Engineer B\u0027s approval, the project would not have been advertised for bids",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Bid Advertisement",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer B\u0027s approval of the plans",
    "Federal funding oversight process",
    "Existence of project documents to advertise"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "indirect",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer B",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Federal approval triggering the bid advertisement process"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}