Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 15-12 (2015) · Engineer’s Obligation to Consider Feasible Options

Professional obligations conflict, and the board applies no fixed rule for which one wins. Each resolution is recorded as three edges: competesWith (the tension), prevailsOver (the obligation the board allowed to win in this case), and defeasibleUnder (the situation under which the yielding obligation gives way). The same tension is then traced across comparable cases, where its resolution shifts with context. Hover any obligation or state to see its definition; click to open it in OntServe.
How this case resolved it
Featured
Engineer A Waterfront Hearing Relevance Pertinence Judgment prevails over Complete Comparative Design Alternatives Presentation Engineer A Route
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
No State context committed for this edge.
Historic Property Harm Minimization Engineer A Route Recommendation prevails over Faithful Agent Route Specification Engineer A JKL State Contract
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Competing Route Design Approaches
  • Farmhouse Owner Refusal — Third-Party Property Rights
  • Historic Farmhouse Multi-Party Interest Balancing
  • Historic Farmhouse Third-Party Impact
Multi-Interest Balancing Engineer A Route Selection Analysis prevails over Faithful Agent Route Specification Engineer A JKL State Contract
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Competing Route Design Approaches
  • Farmhouse Owner Refusal — Third-Party Property Rights
  • Historic Farmhouse Multi-Party Interest Balancing
  • Historic Farmhouse Third-Party Impact
Creative Third Path Solution Exploration Engineer A Route prevails over Eminent Domain Availability Disclosure Engineer A State Route
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Farmhouse Owner Refusal — Third-Party Property Rights
  • Historic Farmhouse Third-Party Impact
Engineers A and B Landfill Professional Judgment Environmental Trade-Off prevails over Engineers A and B Landfill Public Controversy Honest Objectivity
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Landfill Design Regulatory Compliance with Residual Environmental Risk
  • Landfill Higher Contour Design Public Controversy
Engineer A Route Selection Historic Property Displacement Harm Minimization prevails over Engineer A Route Selection Greatest Good Multi-Interest Balancing
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Farmhouse Owner Refusal — Third-Party Property Rights
  • Historic Farmhouse Multi-Party Interest Balancing
  • Historic Farmhouse Third-Party Impact
Complete Comparative Design Alternatives Presentation Engineer A Route prevails over Faithful Agent Route Specification Engineer A JKL State Contract
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Competing Route Design Approaches
  • Farmhouse Owner Refusal — Third-Party Property Rights
  • Historic Farmhouse Multi-Party Interest Balancing
  • Historic Farmhouse Third-Party Impact
Open tensions recorded without a resolution: Creative Third Path Solution Exploration Engineer A Route vs Engineer A Route Selection Greatest Good Multi-Interest Balancing Eminent Domain Availability Disclosure Engineer A State Route vs Historic Property Harm Minimization Engineer A Route Recommendation Eminent Domain Consequence Full Disclosure Engineer A State Route vs Faithful Agent Route Specification Engineer A JKL State Contract Faithful Agent Route Specification Engineer A JKL State Contract vs Farmhouse Owner Proactive Visit Disclosure Engineer A State Client
What the board concluded
  • Engineer A has an obligation to advise the state on all feasible and reasonable solutions in an attempt to reach an amicable resolution of this matter, consistent with the interests of the public, including physically moving the historic farmhouse to another appropriate site owned by the family or another party.
How comparable cases resolved the same tension

A faithful-agent duty yields to a public-protection obligation. The yielding obligation ("Faithful Agent") recurs across cases; the obligation that overrides it and the context under which it yields differ case by case. This is the case-law move: not a single rule, but a family of context-indexed resolutions.

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
24-01
Balancing Client Directives and Public...
Engineer L Client Budget Pressure Refusal Engineer L Faithful Agent Boundary Engineer L Confirmed Risk Without Safeguards; Engineer L Resource Constrained Client
Engineer L Client Override Regulatory Report Engineer L Faithful Agent Boundary Engineer L Confirmed Risk Without Safeguards; Engineer L Resource Constrained Client
20-4
Public Health, Safety, and...
Engineer B Post-Override Regulatory Reporting Engineer B Faithful Agent Boundary MWC Override of Engineers A and B
Engineer A Post-Override Regulatory Reporting Engineer A Faithful Agent Boundary MWC Override of Engineers A and B
95-5
Failure To Include Information In...
Engineer B Expert Witness Neutrality Engineer B Faithful Agent Boundary Engineer B Adversarial Engagement; Engineer B Client Defense Bias
Engineer B Complete Technical Reporting Engineer B Faithful Agent Boundary Engineer B Adversarial Engagement; Engineer B Client Defense Bias
04-8
Public Welfare—Client Action Following...
Engineer A Safety Obligation Wetland Fill Engineer A Faithful Agent Limits Wetland Engineer A Confirmed Environmental Risk; Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Conflict
Engineer A Wetland Confidentiality Limits Engineer A Faithful Agent Limits Wetland Engineer A Confirmed Environmental Risk; Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Conflict