Step 4 Review - Case 13

Step 4: Synthesis Review

Case 13: Sustainability - Lawn Irrigation Design

View Case with Annotations (68) Back to Step 4

Synthesis Annotations Available

68 synthesis annotations have been generated for this case:

6 questions
6 conclusions
56 provision citations

Click "View Case with Annotations" above to see them highlighted in the case text.

16

Total Entities

Passes 1-3

8

Code Provisions

NSPE References

3

Questions

Ethical Dilemmas

3

Conclusions

Board Findings

Synthesis Reasoning Flow

Shows how NSPE provisions inform questions and conclusions - the board's reasoning chain (LangGraph-style)

Show Labels

Node Types & Relationships

Nodes:

■ NSPE Provisions (rectangles) ◆ Questions (diamonds) ▬ Conclusions (rounded) ● Entities (circles)

Edge Colors:

→ Provision informs Question
→ Question answered by Conclusion
→ Provision applies to Entity

Note: For individual entity visualization, see OntServe's full ontology view

NSPE Code Provisions Referenced

NSPE_I_1_ I.1.

Full Text:

Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public.

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'event', 'entity_label': 'Ethical Conflict Emergence', 'reasoning': 'This provision directly relates to the ethical conflict between public welfare (water conservation) and client preferences'}

NSPE_I_4_ I.4.

Full Text:

Act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees.

Relevant Case Excerpts:

From discussion:
"By introducing and offering sustainable alternatives to a traditional lawn irrigation system, Wasser and Cutting Edge can harmonize code provisions I.4 and III.2.d."
Confidence: 85.0%

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Contract Acceptance Decision', 'reasoning': 'This provision governs the decision to accept contracts while maintaining faithfulness to clients'} {'entity_type': 'event', 'entity_label': 'Ethical Conflict Emergence', 'reasoning': "This provision relates to the conflict between being faithful to the client's wishes and other ethical obligations"}

NSPE_II_1_a_ II.1.a.

Full Text:

If engineers' judgment is overruled under circumstances that endanger life or property, they shall notify their employer or client and such other authority as may be appropriate.

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Formal Memorandum Submission', 'reasoning': 'This provision requires notification when judgment is overruled in circumstances endangering property (water resources)'} {'entity_type': 'event', 'entity_label': 'Formal Documentation Creation', 'reasoning': 'This provision necessitates the creation of formal documentation to notify appropriate authorities'}

NSPE_II_1_f_ II.1.f.

Full Text:

Engineers having knowledge of any alleged violation of this Code shall report thereon to appropriate professional bodies and, when relevant, also to public authorities, and cooperate with the proper authorities in furnishing such information or assistance as may be required.

NSPE_III_1_b_ III.1.b.

Full Text:

Engineers shall advise their clients or employers when they believe a project will not be successful.

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Traditional Irrigation System Specification', 'reasoning': 'This provision relates to advising clients when a project (traditional irrigation) may not be successful in meeting sustainability goals'}

NSPE_III_2_a_ III.2.a.

Full Text:

Engineers are encouraged to participate in civic affairs; career guidance for youths; and work for the advancement of the safety, health, and well-being of their community.

NSPE_III_2_d_ III.2.d.

Full Text:

Engineers are encouraged to adhere to the principles of sustainable development1in order to protect the environment for future generations.Footnote 1"Sustainable development" is the challenge of meeting human needs for natural resources, industrial products, energy, food, transportation, shelter, and effective waste management while conserving and protecting environmental quality and the natural resource base essential for future development.

Relevant Case Excerpts:

From facts:
"cosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation, and halt biodiversity loss. Further, Wasser points to NSPE Code of Ethics Professional Obligation III.2.d, “Engineers are encouraged to adhere to the principles of sustainable development,” and claims the proposed lawn irrigation system does not conform to sustainability principles."
Confidence: 95.0%

From discussion:
"In July 2007, the NSPE House of Delegates approved the addition of a sustainable development provision to the Code, Section III.2.d, which read “Engineers are encouraged to adhere to the principles of sustainable development in order to protect the environment for future generations.” A footnote defines sustainable development: “"
Confidence: 90.0%

From discussion:
"This interpretation is fully consistent with NSPE Code Section III.2.d where engineers are encouraged to adhere to the principles of sustainable development."
Confidence: 85.0%

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Traditional Irrigation System Specification', 'reasoning': "This provision directly opposes specifying traditional irrigation systems that don't protect water resources for future generations"} {'entity_type': 'event', 'entity_label': 'Historical Context Activation', 'reasoning': 'This provision relates to the historical context of water scarcity and the need for sustainable development practices'}

NSPE_III_7_ III.7.

Full Text:

Engineers shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of other engineers. Engineers who believe others are guilty of unethical or illegal practice shall present such information to the proper authority for action.

Applies To:

{'entity_type': 'action', 'entity_label': 'Task Delegation to Wasser', 'reasoning': "This provision prohibits attempting to injure another engineer's reputation or practice through inappropriate task delegation"}

Ethical Questions

Question_1

Was it ethical for Cutting Edge Engineering and Engineer Jaylani to accept the irrigation system design task?

Mentioned Entities:
roles states resources principles obligations constraints capabilities actions events

Question_2

Was it ethical for Engineer Intern Wasser to refuse to perform the task of design development for the proposed irrigation system?

Mentioned Entities:
roles states resources principles obligations constraints capabilities actions events

Question_3

If the traditional lawn irrigation system design is an ethical expression of engineering work, what can Engineer Jaylani's firm do to complete the design since Wasser refused?

Mentioned Entities:
roles states resources principles obligations constraints capabilities actions events

Board Conclusions

Conclusion_1

It was ethical for Engineer Jaylani to accept the irrigation system design task.

Answers:
1

Conclusion_2

As a matter of personal conviction, it was ethically permissible, but extreme, for Engineer Intern Wasser to refuse the task of design development for the proposed irrigation system. Performing the design task would not have been manifestly unethical, and refusal likely cost Wasser his job.

Answers:
2

Conclusion_3

Under the facts, traditional lawn irrigation system design is an ethical expression of engineering work. In awareness of sustainability principles, Engineer Jaylani's firm is in a position to better serve its clients and the public by introducing and offering "green" irrigation alternatives.

Answers:
3