Step 4: Case Synthesis

Build a coherent case model from extracted entities

Back to Case
Pipeline Steps
Overview
1 Contextual Framework
2 Normative Requirements
3 Temporal Dynamics Reconcile
4 Whole-Case Synthesis
Extraction Review Full View
Provenance
Former Employer Establishing A New Firm - Soliciting Former Clients After A Period Of Time Has Elapsed
Step 4 of 5
Four-Phase Synthesis Pipeline
1
Entity Foundation
Passes 1-3
2
Analytical Extraction
2A-2E
3
Decision Synthesis
E1-E3 + LLM
4
Narrative
Timeline + Scenario
Phase 1 Entity Foundation
252 entities
Pass 1: Contextual Framework
  • 16 Roles
  • 25 States
  • 15 Resources
Pass 2: Normative Requirements
  • 38 Principles
  • 39 Obligations
  • 40 Constraints
  • 51 Capabilities
Pass 3: Temporal Dynamics
  • 28 Temporal Dynamics
Phase 2 Analytical Extraction
2A: Code Provisions 4
LLM detect algorithmic linking Case text + Phase 1 entities
II.4. Engineers shall act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees.
III.4. Engineers shall not disclose, without consent, confidential information concerning the business affairs or technical processes of any present or forme...
III.4.a. Engineers shall not, without the consent of all interested parties, promote or arrange for new employment or practice in connection with a specific pr...
III.4.b. Engineers shall not, without the consent of all interested parties, participate in or represent an adversary interest in connection with a specific pr...
2B: Precedent Cases 3
LLM extraction Case text
Case No. 86-5 analogizing
It is ethical for engineers to agree to a contract for consulting services independent of their former firm when a client seeks them out directly, provided the engineers balance the interests of the client, the individual engineers, and the firm.
Case No. 77-11 distinguishing
linked
Engineers who leave a firm and contact former clients do not violate the NSPE Code, but they do violate the Code if they compete on projects for which they gained specialized knowledge while employed at the former firm.
Case No. 79-10 supporting
An engineer employed by a firm who seeks to offer services to complete projects under his own responsibility and risk, without the concurrence of the principal of the employing firm, can act ethically when the firm is winding down operations.
2C: Questions & Conclusions 18 24
Board text parsed LLM analytical Q&C LLM Q-C linking Case text + 2A provisions
Questions (18)
Question_1 Was it ethical for Engineer A to establish his own firm in Clover City?
Question_2 Was it ethical for Engineer A to begin soliciting work from ABC’s clients, including Clover City, after a year had passed?
Question_101 Was Engineer A's unilateral expansion of the water treatment report to include elevated storage tank funding - work outside the agreed scope - a self-...
Question_102 Did Engineer A's failure to disclose to ABC that Clover City officials had already expressed interest in retaining him independently - while he was st...
Question_103 Does Clover City's informal pre-departure signal of intent to award Engineer A the elevated storage tank design contract and a retainer create an appe...
Question_104 After Engineer A departs and begins soliciting ABC's clients, is he ethically permitted to leverage the elevated storage tank work he performed while ...
Question_201 Does the Faithful Agent Obligation - requiring Engineer A to act in ABC's interests during employment - conflict with Client Autonomy, given that Clov...
Question_202 Does the principle of Free and Open Competition - which permits Engineer A to solicit ABC's clients after his voluntary moratorium - conflict with the...
Question_203 Does the Voluntary Non-Solicitation Period principle - which the Board treats as ethically sufficient to protect ABC's interests - conflict with the F...
Question_204 Does the Tripartite Interest Balancing principle - which requires weighing ABC's, Engineer A's, and Clover City's interests simultaneously - conflict ...
Question_301 From a deontological perspective, did Engineer A fulfill their duty as a faithful agent to ABC Engineering Company by withholding Clover City's overtu...
Question_302 From a consequentialist perspective, did Engineer A's voluntary one-year solicitation moratorium produce sufficiently good outcomes for ABC Engineerin...
Question_303 From a virtue ethics perspective, did Engineer A demonstrate professional integrity by expanding the water treatment report to include elevated storag...
Question_304 From a deontological perspective, does the absence of a written non-compete agreement between Engineer A and ABC Engineering Company eliminate all eth...
Question_401 Would the Board have reached a different conclusion on the ethics of Engineer A's departure if Engineer A had been a partner or principal at ABC Engin...
Question_402 What if Engineer A had disclosed Clover City's overture to ABC management before resigning - would that disclosure have resolved the faithful agent te...
Question_403 Would the Board's conclusion on post-departure solicitation have changed if Engineer A had begun soliciting ABC's clients immediately after resigning ...
Question_404 What if Engineer A had immediately accepted Clover City's informal offer of a retainer and the elevated storage tank design contract while still emplo...
Conclusions (24)
Conclusion_1 It was ethical for Engineer A to establish his own firm in Clover City.
Conclusion_2 It was ethical for Engineer A to begin soliciting work from ABC’s clients, including Clover City after a year had passed.
Conclusion_101 Beyond the Board's finding that it was ethical for Engineer A to establish his own firm in Clover City, the Board's analysis leaves unexamined a struc...
Conclusion_102 The Board's conclusion that establishing an independent firm was ethical is further complicated by the out-of-scope nature of the elevated storage tan...
Conclusion_103 The Board's treatment of Engineer A's non-principal employee status as a mitigating factor in the departure analysis, while consistent with precedent ...
Conclusion_104 Beyond the Board's finding that post-moratorium solicitation of ABC's clients was ethical, the analysis requires an additional constraint that the Boa...
Conclusion_105 The Board's approval of post-moratorium solicitation rests heavily on the voluntary one-year moratorium as an ethically sufficient cooling-off period,...
Conclusion_106 The Board's conclusion that post-moratorium solicitation was ethical does not adequately address the appearance-of-impropriety concern embedded in Clo...
Conclusion_201 In response to Q101: Engineer A's unilateral expansion of the water treatment report to include elevated storage tank funding elements was ethically a...
Conclusion_202 In response to Q102: Engineer A's failure to disclose Clover City's overture to ABC before resigning constituted a breach of the faithful agent duty u...
Conclusion_203 In response to Q103: Clover City's informal pre-departure signal of intent to award Engineer A both a retainer and the elevated storage tank design co...
Conclusion_204 In response to Q104: Engineer A faces a perpetual, though not absolute, constraint on how he may exploit the elevated storage tank work in post-depart...
Conclusion_205 In response to Q201: The tension between the Faithful Agent Obligation and Client Autonomy is genuine and the Board resolved it too quickly in favor o...
Conclusion_206 In response to Q202: The tension between Free and Open Competition and the Post-Employment Confidential Information Non-Use principle is not fully res...
Conclusion_207 In response to Q203: The Voluntary Non-Solicitation Period principle is structurally undermined as a protective mechanism for ABC precisely because En...
Conclusion_208 In response to Q301 (deontological analysis of non-disclosure): From a deontological perspective, Engineer A failed to fulfill the full scope of his f...
Conclusion_209 In response to Q304 (deontological analysis of non-compete absence): From a deontological perspective, the absence of a written non-compete agreement ...
Conclusion_210 In response to Q401 (counterfactual - partner vs. staff status): The Board would very likely have reached a different conclusion had Engineer A been a...
Conclusion_211 In response to Q402 (counterfactual - prior disclosure): Had Engineer A disclosed Clover City's overture to ABC management before resigning, the discl...
Conclusion_212 In response to Q403 (counterfactual - immediate post-departure solicitation): Had Engineer A begun soliciting ABC's clients immediately upon resignati...
Conclusion_213 In response to Q404 (counterfactual - immediate acceptance of Clover City offer while still employed): Had Engineer A immediately accepted Clover City...
Conclusion_301 The Board resolved the tension between the Faithful Agent Obligation and Client Autonomy by treating the client-initiated nature of Engineer A's depar...
Conclusion_302 The tension between Free and Open Competition and the Post-Employment Confidential Information Non-Use principle was resolved in Engineer A's favor pr...
Conclusion_303 The Voluntary Non-Solicitation Period principle and the Tripartite Interest Balancing principle interact in this case to produce a resolution that is ...
2D: Transformation Classification
phase_lag 81%
LLM classification Phase 1 entities + 2C Q&C

Engineer A's conduct during ABC employment — expanding report scope to include tank funding, receiving Clover City's overture, and withholding that overture from ABC — constituted a hidden parallel scenario whose ethical consequences were deferred. The one-year moratorium functioned not as a genuine cooling-off period but as a temporal buffer that obscured the pre-existing competitive arrangement. When Engineer A began soliciting after the moratorium, obligations that had been latent since the employment period — faithful agent disclosure duties, post-employment confidential information non-use constraints, and the appearance-of-impropriety concern embedded in Clover City's pre-departure commitment — surfaced simultaneously, creating retrospective ethical duties that the Board was forced to evaluate long after the conditions generating them had been established.

Reasoning

The ethical obligations in this case did not resolve at the moment of the triggering actions — Engineer A's out-of-scope tank work, Clover City's pre-departure overture, and Engineer A's non-disclosure — but instead became visible and ethically consequential only after a temporal gap: the one-year moratorium elapsed, solicitation commenced, and the Board retrospectively examined conduct whose ethical significance was latent during the employment period. The Board's own conclusions (C7, C8, C13, C15) confirm that the informational and relational harms to ABC were not apparent at the time they were generated but emerged only when Engineer A's post-moratorium solicitation revealed the full competitive structure that had been quietly assembled during active employment. This matches the phase_lag pattern precisely: stakeholders performed parallel scenarios — Engineer A cultivating an independent client pipeline while simultaneously executing ABC's contract — and the consequences of that parallelism became ethically legible only after time had passed and circumstances had changed.

2E: Rich Analysis (Causal Links, Question Emergence, Resolution Patterns)
LLM batched analysis label-to-URI resolution Phase 1 entities + 2C Q&C + 2A provisions
Causal-Normative Links (5)
CausalLink_Withheld Client Overture from Engineer A's withholding of Clover City's overture from ABC creates a tension between the faithful agent obligation requiring disclosure of conflicts ...
CausalLink_Expanded Report Scope Unilater Engineer A's unilateral expansion of the report scope to include elevated storage tank funding elements must be assessed against the non-self-serving ...
CausalLink_Established Independent Engine Engineer A's establishment of an independent firm is ethically permissible under the free enterprise and at-will employment symmetry principles, mitig...
CausalLink_Self-Imposed Client Solicitati Engineer A's self-imposed moratorium on client solicitation directly fulfills the voluntary non-solicitation period ethical transition obligation and ...
CausalLink_Initiated Solicitation of Form After the voluntary moratorium expires, Engineer A's solicitation of former ABC clients including Clover City is permissible under the free and open c...
Question Emergence (18)
QuestionEmergence_1 This question arose because Engineer A's firm establishment sits at the intersection of two legitimate but competing ethical frameworks: the engineer'...
QuestionEmergence_2 This question arose because the voluntary moratorium created a temporal marker that Engineer A treated as ethically sufficient, but the NSPE framework...
QuestionEmergence_3 This question arose because the out-of-scope expansion sits at the intersection of two irreconcilable interpretations of the same act: a conscientious...
QuestionEmergence_4 This question arose because Engineer A occupied a dual position - actively serving ABC's client while simultaneously receiving that client's invitatio...
QuestionEmergence_5 This question arose because the informal pre-departure commitment from Clover City officials occupies a structural position in the fact pattern that n...
QuestionEmergence_6 This question emerged because Engineer A's unilateral scope expansion created a hybrid work product that sits ambiguously between personal professiona...
QuestionEmergence_7 This question emerged because the overture originated from the client rather than from Engineer A, disrupting the standard faithful-agent analysis tha...
QuestionEmergence_8 This question emerged because the voluntary moratorium resolves the temporal dimension of post-employment competition but leaves entirely unresolved t...
QuestionEmergence_9 This question emerged because the Board's approval of the moratorium as ethically sufficient and its simultaneous acknowledgment that non-disclosure w...
QuestionEmergence_10 This question emerged because the tripartite-balancing framework presupposes that all three parties enter the ethical analysis on roughly equal footin...
QuestionEmergence_11 This question emerged because the Clover City overture occurred at the precise intersection of Engineer A's active employment duties and an externally...
QuestionEmergence_12 This question emerged because the voluntary moratorium is a consequentially ambiguous act: it imposes a real competitive cost on Engineer A's new firm...
QuestionEmergence_13 This question emerged because the out-of-scope initiative is motivationally ambiguous: the same action that constitutes exemplary professional virtue ...
QuestionEmergence_14 This question emerged because the absence of a written non-compete creates a legal vacuum that deontological ethics must fill independently of contrac...
QuestionEmergence_15 This question emerged because the Board's reasoning explicitly treated Engineer A's non-principal status as ethically relevant, creating a counterfact...
QuestionEmergence_16 This question arose because the Board found a faithful agent tension in Engineer A's non-disclosure yet stopped short of finding an ethical violation,...
QuestionEmergence_17 This question emerged because the Board praised the voluntary moratorium as ethically significant without specifying whether its absence would have ch...
QuestionEmergence_18 This question arose because the Board's treatment of the elevated storage tank work as speculative and non-entitling left unresolved the harder scenar...
Resolution Patterns (24)
ResolutionPattern_1 The Board resolved Q202 by finding that the one-year moratorium was insufficient on its own to reconcile free competition with confidentiality obligat...
ResolutionPattern_2 The Board concluded that establishing an independent firm was ethical primarily because Engineer A held no ownership stake in ABC and had signed no no...
ResolutionPattern_3 The Board concluded that post-moratorium solicitation was ethically permissible because Engineer A had voluntarily imposed a one-year waiting period t...
ResolutionPattern_4 The Board concluded that departure was ethical on free enterprise grounds but left unexamined the structurally distinct question of whether Engineer A...
ResolutionPattern_5 The Board concluded that establishing an independent firm was ethical without resolving whether the conditions that made departure attractive - specif...
ResolutionPattern_6 The Board resolved the question of whether Engineer A's departure was ethical by invoking his staff-engineer status as a mitigating factor consistent ...
ResolutionPattern_7 The Board concluded that post-moratorium solicitation of ABC's clients was ethical based on the passage of the one-year voluntary period, but the conc...
ResolutionPattern_8 The Board approved post-moratorium solicitation as ethical on the basis of the voluntary one-year cooling-off period, but the conclusion is weakened b...
ResolutionPattern_9 The Board concluded that post-moratorium solicitation was ethical without addressing the appearance-of-impropriety concern embedded in Clover City's p...
ResolutionPattern_10 The Board found Engineer A's unilateral expansion of the water treatment report to be ethically ambiguous rather than a clear violation, acknowledging...
ResolutionPattern_11 The board concluded that Engineer A's non-disclosure constituted a breach of the faithful agent duty because the overture was substantive enough to tr...
ResolutionPattern_12 The board concluded that Clover City's pre-departure signal constituted a conditional inducement - 'establish your firm and we will give you work' - t...
ResolutionPattern_13 The board concluded that Engineer A faces a perpetual but not absolute constraint on exploiting the tank work in solicitations - he may claim general ...
ResolutionPattern_14 The board concluded that the Board resolved the Faithful Agent versus Client Autonomy tension too quickly in favor of client autonomy, because client ...
ResolutionPattern_15 The board concluded that the Voluntary Non-Solicitation Period principle is structurally undermined as a protective mechanism precisely because Engine...
ResolutionPattern_16 The board resolved Q11 by applying Kantian universalizability to Engineer A's conduct: the maxim 'I may withhold from my employer information about a ...
ResolutionPattern_17 The board resolved Q14 by distinguishing the contractual enforcement question from the ethical obligation question: Code Sections II.4, III.4, III.4.a...
ResolutionPattern_18 The board resolved Q15 by finding that a partner or principal at ABC would almost certainly have been found in violation of fiduciary duties owed to c...
ResolutionPattern_19 The board resolved Q16 by finding that prior disclosure would have substantially resolved the faithful agent tension by fulfilling Code Section III.4....
ResolutionPattern_20 The board resolved Q17 by finding that immediate post-departure solicitation would very likely have been found ethically impermissible, because the vo...
ResolutionPattern_21 The Board concluded that immediate acceptance of Clover City's offer while still employed would have constituted a paradigmatic breach of the faithful...
ResolutionPattern_22 The Board concluded that because Clover City initiated the suggestion of independent engagement, Engineer A bore reduced culpability for the loyalty d...
ResolutionPattern_23 The Board concluded that post-departure competition with ABC for Clover City's work was permissible because Engineer A carried no proprietary technica...
ResolutionPattern_24 The Board concluded that the voluntary one-year non-solicitation period adequately balanced the competing interests of ABC, Engineer A, and Clover Cit...
Phase 3 Decision Point Synthesis
Decision Point Synthesis (E1-E3 + Q&C Alignment + LLM)
E1-E3 algorithmic Q&C scoring LLM refinement Phase 1 entities + 2C Q&C + 2E rich analysis
E1
Obligation Coverage
-
E2
Action Mapping
-
E3
Composition
-
Q&C
Alignment
-
LLM
Refinement
-
Phase 4 Narrative Construction
Narrative Elements (Event Calculus + Scenario Seeds)
algorithmic base LLM enhancement Phase 1 entities + Phase 3 decision points
4.1
Characters
-
4.2
Timeline
-
4.3
Conflicts
-
4.4
Decisions
-
Review Entities & Commit View Synthesis

© Licensed under the GNU GPL v3 | Report Issue