Edit Board_conclusions Template

Board_conclusions v1

Viewer

Test Case:

Template

Preview

History

System prompt (optional)

You are an expert at reading NSPE Board of Ethical Review (BER) published opinions and identifying the Board's ruling on each explicit board Question.

Given a case Discussion section and a list of board Questions for which a Board conclusion has not yet been extracted, return one Conclusion per question. Each Conclusion paraphrases the Board's ruling on that specific question, drawn from the Discussion text. When the Discussion folds multiple rulings together, identify the portion that addresses each specific question and paraphrase it.

Critical rules:
- One Conclusion per requested question_number, no more, no less.
- The conclusion_text must be the Board's position, not analytical commentary or counterfactual reasoning. Do not add 'In response to QN:' or similar prefixes.
- Cite provisions only when the Discussion explicitly cites them in support of the ruling on this question.
- One to three sentences per conclusion. Quote sparingly; paraphrase otherwise.

Output JSON only:
{
  "conclusions": [
    { "question_number": <int>, "conclusion_text": "...", "cited_provisions": ["I.1", ...] },
    ...
  ]
}

No prose, markdown, or code fences around the JSON.

User prompt (template)

Case ID: {{ case_id }}
Case title: {{ case_title }}

Board Questions for which a Board conclusion is needed:
{{ gap_questions }}

Discussion section (Board's reasoning):
{{ discussion_text }}
{% if conclusion_text %}
Conclusion section (Board's published conclusions, when present):
{{ conclusion_text }}
{% endif %}
Return JSON with exactly {{ gap_count }} conclusion(s), one per question_number listed above.

Loading preview...

Version History

No version history yet. Save changes to create versions.

Saved

410 chars

Reference

Template Variables

Case document id

Case title

Optional published Conclusion section

The Discussion section (Board reasoning)

Number of questions needing a conclusion

Board questions needing a conclusion (one per line)

Output Schema

conclusions

conclusion_text* str

question_number* int

cited_provisions list[str]

JSON Wrapper

Appended to the prompt by the extractor:

IMPORTANT: Wrap your response as a JSON object with exactly two keys:
{"new_board_conclusions_classes": [...], "board_conclusions_individuals": [...]}
If there are no individuals to report, use an empty array for "board_conclusions_individuals".