Case Repository
Filtering by:
Associating with Others
2025
Community Engagement for Infrastructure Projects
Case #24-04
Synthesized
Questions:
- Should Engineer M challenge the validity of Firm DBA’s report?
- Should Engineer M raise any concerns with the City, as the client, and, if so, how?
- Are Firm DBA’s actions ethical? Even though Firm DBA is not providing engineering services, are they required to abide by NSPE’s Code of Ethics?
Conclusions:
- Engineer M should challenge the validity of Firm DBA’s report as Firm DBA did not abide by the Code in a number of instances.
- Engineer M should first confer with Firm DBA to correct all discrepancies in the report. If no agreement can be made going forward, Engineer M should confer with the City to outline the ethical obligations. Engineer M should also consider any obligations they may have to report to the state licensure board.
- The actions of Firm DBA are not ethical under the Code as the services provided were under the supervision and ownership of licensed professional engineers.