Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 92-6 (1992) · Public Welfare - Hazardous Waste

Professional obligations conflict, and the board applies no fixed rule for which one wins. Each resolution is recorded as three edges: competesWith (the tension), prevailsOver (the obligation the board allowed to win in this case), and defeasibleUnder (the situation under which the yielding obligation gives way). The same tension is then traced across comparable cases, where its resolution shifts with context. Hover any obligation or state to see its definition; click to open it in OntServe.
How this case resolved it competition structure in OntServe
Featured
Engineer B Paramount Public Welfare Duty prevails over Engineer B Faithful Agent Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Client Business Relationship Conflict
What the board concluded
  • It was unethical for Engineer B to merely inform the client of the presence of the drums.
  • It was unethical for Engineer B to fail to advise his client that he suspected hazardous material and provide a recommendation concerning removal and disposal in accordance with federal, state and local laws.
Recorded violations: Partial Client Disclosure violates Engineer B Drum Hazard Disclosure Duty Partial Client Disclosure violates Engineer B Paramount Public Welfare Duty
How comparable cases resolved this and related tensions

Read at the type level, this resolution is: Faithful Agent Obligation yields to Safety Obligation. Comparison across cases happens at this level; the duty types recur while each case's obligations instantiate them. Cases below are grouped by how much of that pairing they share. A duty type that yields here may prevail elsewhere, which is the context-dependence itself, not an inconsistency.

Same tension: both duty types match, so the board ruled on this exact pairing. Related tension: only one duty type matches; the other duty differs, so these show how a type behaves elsewhere rather than a ruling on this pairing.

Case Prevailing type Yielding type Relation to this case
Same tension: both duty types match (4)
24-1
Balancing Client Directives and Public...
Safety Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the same way
76-4
Public Welfare - Knowledge of Information...
Safety Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the same way
89-7
Duty To Report Safety Violations
Safety Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the same way
97-13
Duty To Report Unrelated Information...
Faithful Agent Obligation Safety Obligation Same tension, resolved the opposite way
Related tension: one duty type matches (14)

Closest instance-level matches, ranked on the specific obligations and contexts of this case:

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
76-4
Public Welfare - Knowledge of Information...
Engineer Doe Paramount Public Duty Engineer Doe Faithful Agent Duty No Written Report Directive
88-6
Whistleblowing - City Engineer
Engineer A Proper Authority Reporting Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Loyalty Versus Public Protection Conflict
18-9
Public Health and Safety—Building Codes to...
Engineer A Public Safety Duty Engineer A Client Persuasion Duty Client Duty Versus Public Safety Conflict; Owner Cost Based Refusal
24-1
Balancing Client Directives and Public...
Engineer L Watershed Safety Duty Engineer L Faithful Agent Duty Public Safety Faithful Agent Conflict
89-7
Duty To Report Safety Violations
Engineer A Safety Precedence Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Code Exception Disclosure Release