Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 22-2 (2022) · Sharing As-Built Drawings

Professional obligations conflict, and the board applies no fixed rule for which one wins. Each resolution is recorded as three edges: competesWith (the tension), prevailsOver (the obligation the board allowed to win in this case), and defeasibleUnder (the situation under which the yielding obligation gives way). The same tension is then traced across comparable cases, where its resolution shifts with context. Hover any obligation or state to see its definition; click to open it in OntServe.
How this case resolved it competition structure in OntServe
Featured
Engineer D Formal Sharing Channel Duty prevails over Engineer D Faithful Agent Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Informal As-Built Sharing Impropriety Appearance
  • Pre-Bid Selective Sharing Award Risk
What the board concluded
  • It is ethical for Engineer D to make it known that as-built drawings are available; but they should be readily available to contractors as part of the standard project delivery process to assure that all contractors have equal access to the information.
  • It is unethical for Engineer D to share as-built documents selectively pre-bid. D should work to make as-built documents available for all bidders as part of contract documents.
How comparable cases resolved this and related tensions

Read at the type level, this resolution is: Faithful Agent Obligation yields to Disclosure Obligation. Comparison across cases happens at this level; the duty types recur while each case's obligations instantiate them. Cases below are grouped by how much of that pairing they share. A duty type that yields here may prevail elsewhere, which is the context-dependence itself, not an inconsistency.

Same tension: both duty types match, so the board ruled on this exact pairing. Related tension: only one duty type matches; the other duty differs, so these show how a type behaves elsewhere rather than a ruling on this pairing.

Case Prevailing type Yielding type Relation to this case
Related tension: one duty type matches (13)

Closest instance-level matches, ranked on the specific obligations and contexts of this case:

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
88-6
Whistleblowing - City Engineer
Engineer A Proper Authority Reporting Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Loyalty Versus Public Protection Conflict
82-2
Confidentiality of Engineering Report
Engineer A Client Confidentiality Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Engineer A Good Faith Assumption; Report Copy Sent to Realty Firm
89-7
Duty To Report Safety Violations
Engineer A Safety Precedence Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Code Exception Disclosure Release
96-8
Peer Review - Confidentiality Agreements
Engineer A Authority Cooperation Duty Engineer A Confidentiality Duty Confidentiality Versus Cooperation Dilemma
92-6
Public Welfare - Hazardous Waste
Engineer B Paramount Public Welfare Duty Engineer B Faithful Agent Duty Client Business Relationship Conflict