Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 08-10 (2008) · Public Welfare—Design of Medical Equipment

How this case resolved it competition structure in OntServe
Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty prevails over Engineer A Conditional Reporting Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Internal Mechanisms Available MedTech
Engineer A Internal Recourse Duty prevails over Engineer A Conditional Reporting Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Internal Mechanisms Available MedTech
Open tensions recorded without a resolution: Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty vs Engineer A Public Safety Duty
What the board concluded
From the Board's conclusions in Case 08-10:
  • It was not ethical for Engineer A to indicate that if prompt measures are not taken to correct the problem, he will be compelled to report the matter to an appropriate federal regulatory agency. Instead, Engineer A should have sought to determine what internal steps are being taken to address the concerns. However, if after making additional inquiries, Engineer A determined that no meaningful...
Recorded violations: Corrective Action Omission violates Engineer A Public Safety Duty External Reporting Threat violates Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty
How comparable cases resolved this and related tensions

Read at the type level, this resolution is: Reporting Obligation yields to Faithful Agent Obligation. Comparison across cases happens at this level; the duty types recur while each case's obligations instantiate them. Cases below are grouped by how much of that pairing they share. A duty type that yields here may prevail elsewhere, which is the context-dependence itself, not an inconsistency.

Same tension: both duty types match, so the board ruled on this exact pairing. Related tension: only one duty type matches; the other duty differs, so these show how a type behaves elsewhere rather than a ruling on this pairing.

Case Prevailing type Yielding type Relation to this case
Same tension: both duty types match (3)
85-4
Objectivity of Engineer Retained as Expert
Faithful Agent Obligation Objectivity Obligation Same tension, resolved the same way
76-4
Public Welfare - Knowledge of Information...
Reporting Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the opposite way
89-7
Duty To Report Safety Violations
Reporting Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the opposite way
Related tension: one duty type matches (16)

Closest instance-level matches, ranked on the specific obligations and contexts of this case:

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
97-13
Duty To Report Unrelated Information...
Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Engineer A Public Safety Duty Client Report Omission Directive
17-3
Public Health, Safety and...
Engineer A Corrective Action Escalation Duty Engineer A Client Defect Reporting Duty Higher Ethical Threshold for Engineer A
93-3
Appropriate Notification And Review Of...
Engineer B Faithful Agent Duty Engineer B Peer Notification Duty Franchiser Nondisclosure Directive