Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 24-05 (2025) · Sustainable Development and Resilient Infrastructure

Professional obligations conflict, and the board applies no fixed rule for which one wins. Each resolution is recorded as three edges: competesWith (the tension), prevailsOver (the obligation the board allowed to win in this case), and defeasibleUnder (the situation under which the yielding obligation gives way). The same tension is then traced across comparable cases, where its resolution shifts with context. Hover any obligation or state to see its definition; click to open it in OntServe.
How this case resolved it
Featured
Engineer K Complete Comparative Presentation Traditional vs Sustainable Flood Control prevails over Engineer K Post-Decision Faithful Agent Deference City Council Flood Control Decision
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • City Refusal to Mitigate Underserved Community Risk
  • Competing Professional Duties on Public Disclosure
  • Confirmed Floodwater Diversion Risk Without Mitigation
Post-Client-Override Public Safety Escalation - Engineer K - Underserved Community Residual Risk prevails over Engineer K Post-Decision Faithful Agent Deference City Council Flood Control Decision
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • City Refusal to Mitigate Underserved Community Risk
  • Competing Professional Duties on Public Disclosure
  • Confirmed Floodwater Diversion Risk Without Mitigation
Safety Obligation - Engineer K - Public Flood Protection prevails over Engineer K Post-Decision Faithful Agent Deference City Council Flood Control Decision
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • City Refusal to Mitigate Underserved Community Risk
  • Competing Professional Duties on Public Disclosure
  • Confirmed Floodwater Diversion Risk Without Mitigation
Engineer K Faithful Agent Trustee Flood Control Design Phase prevails over Engineer K Post-Decision Faithful Agent Deference City Council Flood Control Decision
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • City Refusal to Mitigate Underserved Community Risk
  • Competing Professional Duties on Public Disclosure
  • Confirmed Floodwater Diversion Risk Without Mitigation
Safety Obligation - Engineer K - Public Flood Protection prevails over Faithful Agent Obligation - Engineer K - City Client
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • City Refusal to Mitigate Underserved Community Risk
  • Confirmed Floodwater Diversion Risk Without Mitigation
Open tensions recorded without a resolution: Climate Resilience Design Alignment - Engineer K - City Resilience Policy vs Faithful Agent Obligation - Engineer K - City Client Disclosure Obligation - City Municipal Infrastructure Client - Environmental Justice Risk vs Engineer K Post-Decision Faithful Agent Deference City Council Flood Control Decision Engineer K Complete Comparative Presentation Traditional vs Sustainable Flood Control vs Faithful Agent Obligation - Engineer K - City Client Engineer K Creative Hybrid Solution Exploration Underserved Community Flood Risk vs Faithful Agent Obligation - Engineer K - City Client Engineer K Non-Discrimination Design Impact Underserved Community Flood Risk vs Safety Obligation - Engineer K - Public Flood Protection Engineer K Post-Decision Faithful Agent Deference City Council Flood Control Decision vs Engineer K Sustainable Development Integration Flood Control Design Analysis Engineer K Post-Decision Faithful Agent Deference City Council Flood Control Decision vs Public Welfare Safety Escalation - Engineer K - Underserved Community Flood Risk Engineer K Sustainable Development Integration Flood Control Design Analysis vs Faithful Agent Obligation - Engineer K - City Client Environmental Justice Risk Disclosure - Engineer K - Underserved Community Flood Diversion vs Faithful Agent Obligation - Engineer K - City Client
What the board concluded
  • Because Engineer K has entered into a contract to design the new flood water control system, Engineer K has an ethical obligation to act as a faithful agent or trustee.
How comparable cases resolved the same tension

A faithful-agent duty yields to a public-protection obligation. The yielding obligation ("Faithful Agent") recurs across cases; the obligation that overrides it and the context under which it yields differ case by case. This is the case-law move: not a single rule, but a family of context-indexed resolutions.

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
24-01
Balancing Client Directives and Public...
Engineer L Client Budget Pressure Refusal Engineer L Faithful Agent Boundary Engineer L Confirmed Risk Without Safeguards; Engineer L Resource Constrained Client
Engineer L Client Override Regulatory Report Engineer L Faithful Agent Boundary Engineer L Confirmed Risk Without Safeguards; Engineer L Resource Constrained Client
20-4
Public Health, Safety, and...
Engineer B Post-Override Regulatory Reporting Engineer B Faithful Agent Boundary MWC Override of Engineers A and B
Engineer A Post-Override Regulatory Reporting Engineer A Faithful Agent Boundary MWC Override of Engineers A and B
95-5
Failure To Include Information In...
Engineer B Expert Witness Neutrality Engineer B Faithful Agent Boundary Engineer B Adversarial Engagement; Engineer B Client Defense Bias
Engineer B Complete Technical Reporting Engineer B Faithful Agent Boundary Engineer B Adversarial Engagement; Engineer B Client Defense Bias
04-8
Public Welfare—Client Action Following...
Engineer A Safety Obligation Wetland Fill Engineer A Faithful Agent Limits Wetland Engineer A Confirmed Environmental Risk; Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Conflict
Engineer A Wetland Confidentiality Limits Engineer A Faithful Agent Limits Wetland Engineer A Confirmed Environmental Risk; Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Conflict