Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 24-1 (2024) · Balancing Client Directives and Public Welfare: Stormwater Management Dilemma

How this case resolved it competition structure in OntServe
Engineer L Watershed Safety Duty prevails over Engineer L Faithful Agent Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Public Safety Faithful Agent Conflict
What the board concluded
From the Board's conclusions in Case 24-1:
  • It was not unethical for Engineer L to cease work when requested by Client X, without voicing concern about unquantified increased risk. Later, Engineer L did comply with Code provisions that require engineers to notify their employers or clients if a project will not be successful.
  • It would not be ethical for Engineer L to continue working on Client X’s project when Client X refuses to invest in the protective measures identified by Engineer L. Continuing to work on the project after concerns about runoff were quantified would in effect mean Engineer L was placing the clients’ financial interest above the engineer’s paramount obligation to the public health, safety, and...
How comparable cases resolved this and related tensions

Read at the type level, this resolution is: Faithful Agent Obligation yields to Safety Obligation. Comparison across cases happens at this level; the duty types recur while each case's obligations instantiate them. Cases below are grouped by how much of that pairing they share. A duty type that yields here may prevail elsewhere, which is the context-dependence itself, not an inconsistency.

Same tension: both duty types match, so the board ruled on this exact pairing. Related tension: only one duty type matches; the other duty differs, so these show how a type behaves elsewhere rather than a ruling on this pairing.

Case Prevailing type Yielding type Relation to this case
Same tension: both duty types match (8)
76-4
Public Welfare - Knowledge of Information...
Safety Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the same way
89-7
Duty To Report Safety Violations
Safety Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the same way
88-6
Whistleblowing - City Engineer
Safety Withdrawal and Notification Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the same way
92-6
Public Welfare - Hazardous Waste
Safety Obligation Faithful Agent Obligation Same tension, resolved the same way
24-5
Sustainable Development and Resilient...
Faithful Agent Obligation Professional Accountability Obligation Same tension, resolved the opposite way
97-13
Duty To Report Unrelated Information...
Faithful Agent Obligation Safety Obligation Same tension, resolved the opposite way
93-3
Appropriate Notification And Review Of...
Faithful Agent Obligation Peer Review Cooperation Obligation Same tension, resolved the opposite way
85-4
Objectivity of Engineer Retained as Expert
Faithful Agent Obligation Objectivity Obligation Same tension, resolved the opposite way
Related tension: one duty type matches (16)

Closest instance-level matches, ranked on the specific obligations and contexts of this case:

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
88-6
Whistleblowing - City Engineer
Engineer A Proper Authority Reporting Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Loyalty Versus Public Protection Conflict
89-7
Duty To Report Safety Violations
Engineer A Safety Precedence Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Code Exception Disclosure Release
92-6
Public Welfare - Hazardous Waste
Engineer B Paramount Public Welfare Duty Engineer B Faithful Agent Duty Client Business Relationship Conflict
18-9
Public Health and Safety—Building Codes to...
Engineer A Public Safety Duty Engineer A Client Persuasion Duty Client Duty Versus Public Safety Conflict; Owner Cost Based Refusal
76-4
Public Welfare - Knowledge of Information...
Engineer Doe Authority Reporting Duty Engineer Doe Faithful Agent Duty No Written Report Directive