Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 85-4 (1985) · Objectivity of Engineer Retained as Expert

Professional obligations conflict, and the board applies no fixed rule for which one wins. Each resolution is recorded as three edges: competesWith (the tension), prevailsOver (the obligation the board allowed to win in this case), and defeasibleUnder (the situation under which the yielding obligation gives way). The same tension is then traced across comparable cases, where its resolution shifts with context. Hover any obligation or state to see its definition; click to open it in OntServe.
How this case resolved it competition structure in OntServe
Featured
Engineer A Former Client Loyalty Duty prevails over Engineer A Objectivity Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Engineer A Successive Adverse Retention Conflict
What the board concluded
  • It was unethical for Engineer A to agree to provide a separate engineering and safety analysis report.
Recorded violations: Failure to Consult Former Client violates Engineer A Former Client Loyalty Duty Adverse Party Engagement Acceptance violates Engineer A Former Client Confidentiality Duty
How comparable cases resolved this and related tensions

Read at the type level, this resolution is: Objectivity Obligation yields to Faithful Agent Obligation. Comparison across cases happens at this level; the duty types recur while each case's obligations instantiate them. Cases below are grouped by how much of that pairing they share. A duty type that yields here may prevail elsewhere, which is the context-dependence itself, not an inconsistency.

Same tension: both duty types match, so the board ruled on this exact pairing. Related tension: only one duty type matches; the other duty differs, so these show how a type behaves elsewhere rather than a ruling on this pairing.

Case Prevailing type Yielding type Relation to this case
Related tension: one duty type matches (14)

Closest instance-level matches, ranked on the specific obligations and contexts of this case:

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
82-2
Confidentiality of Engineering Report
Engineer A Client Confidentiality Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Engineer A Good Faith Assumption; Report Copy Sent to Realty Firm