Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 82-2 (1982) · Confidentiality of Engineering Report

Professional obligations conflict, and the board applies no fixed rule for which one wins. Each resolution is recorded as three edges: competesWith (the tension), prevailsOver (the obligation the board allowed to win in this case), and defeasibleUnder (the situation under which the yielding obligation gives way). The same tension is then traced across comparable cases, where its resolution shifts with context. Hover any obligation or state to see its definition; click to open it in OntServe.
How this case resolved it competition structure in OntServe
Featured
Engineer A Client Confidentiality Duty prevails over Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Engineer A Good Faith Assumption
  • Report Copy Sent to Realty Firm
Open tensions recorded without a resolution: Engineer A Client Confidentiality Duty vs Engineer A Report Confidentiality Duty
What the board concluded
  • Engineer A acted unethically in submitting a copy of the home inspection to the real estate firm representing the owners.
Recorded violations: Unauthorized Report Disclosure violates Engineer A Report Confidentiality Duty Unauthorized Report Disclosure violates Engineer A Client Confidentiality Duty
How comparable cases resolved this and related tensions

Read at the type level, this resolution is: Faithful Agent Obligation yields to Confidentiality Obligation. Comparison across cases happens at this level; the duty types recur while each case's obligations instantiate them. Cases below are grouped by how much of that pairing they share. A duty type that yields here may prevail elsewhere, which is the context-dependence itself, not an inconsistency.

Same tension: both duty types match, so the board ruled on this exact pairing. Related tension: only one duty type matches; the other duty differs, so these show how a type behaves elsewhere rather than a ruling on this pairing.

Case Prevailing type Yielding type Relation to this case
Related tension: one duty type matches (19)

Closest instance-level matches, ranked on the specific obligations and contexts of this case:

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
88-6
Whistleblowing - City Engineer
Engineer A Proper Authority Reporting Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Loyalty Versus Public Protection Conflict
89-7
Duty To Report Safety Violations
Engineer A Authority Notification Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Code Exception Disclosure Release
76-4
Public Welfare - Knowledge of Information...
Engineer Doe Authority Reporting Duty Engineer Doe Faithful Agent Duty No Written Report Directive
22-2
Sharing As-Built Drawings
Engineer D Formal Sharing Channel Duty Engineer D Faithful Agent Duty Informal As-Built Sharing Impropriety Appearance; Pre-Bid Selective Sharing Award Risk
92-6
Public Welfare - Hazardous Waste
Engineer B Paramount Public Welfare Duty Engineer B Faithful Agent Duty Client Business Relationship Conflict