Obligation-Conflict Resolution

Case 18-9 (2018) · Public Health and Safety—Building Codes to Address Environmental Risk

How this case resolved it competition structure in OntServe
Engineer A Public Safety Duty prevails over Engineer A Client Persuasion Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Client Duty Versus Public Safety Conflict
  • Owner Cost Based Refusal
Engineer A Public Safety Duty prevails over Engineer A Conditional Withdrawal Duty
the two obligations are in tension (competesWith)
the yielding obligation gives way only under (defeasibleUnder):
  • Coastal Storm Surge Safety Risk
  • Owner Cost Based Refusal
Open tensions recorded without a resolution: Engineer A Client Persuasion Duty vs Engineer A Conditional Withdrawal Duty
What the board concluded
From the Board's conclusions in Case 18-9:
  • Engineer A should continue to pursue discussions with Client A to convince Client A of the danger in which future residents, as well as the general public, could be placed, and the potential for significant property and environmental damage. If Client A refuses to agree with Engineer A’s design standard, Engineer A should withdraw from the project.
How comparable cases resolved this and related tensions

Read at the type level, this resolution is: Proactive Risk Disclosure Obligation yields to Safety Obligation. Comparison across cases happens at this level; the duty types recur while each case's obligations instantiate them. Cases below are grouped by how much of that pairing they share. A duty type that yields here may prevail elsewhere, which is the context-dependence itself, not an inconsistency.

Same tension: both duty types match, so the board ruled on this exact pairing. Related tension: only one duty type matches; the other duty differs, so these show how a type behaves elsewhere rather than a ruling on this pairing.

Case Prevailing type Yielding type Relation to this case
Related tension: one duty type matches (19)

Closest instance-level matches, ranked on the specific obligations and contexts of this case:

Case Obligation that prevailed Yielding obligation Context (defeasibleUnder)
96-8
Peer Review - Confidentiality Agreements
Engineer A Public Safety Duty Engineer A Confidentiality Duty Confidentiality Versus Cooperation Dilemma
93-8
Use Of Broad Indemnification Clause For...
Engineer A Liability Protection Duty Client Indemnification Duty Limited Pollution Insurance Availability
92-6
Public Welfare - Hazardous Waste
Engineer B Paramount Public Welfare Duty Engineer B Faithful Agent Duty Client Business Relationship Conflict
88-6
Whistleblowing - City Engineer
Engineer A Proper Authority Reporting Duty Engineer A Faithful Agent Duty Loyalty Versus Public Protection Conflict
21-2
Public Health, Safety, and ...
Engineer A Public Safety Duty Beyond Law Engineer A Design Compliance Duty Outdated Climate Design Standards